Thorn Reality (1 Viewer)

[dongonzalos]

yep fair comment Otis maybe it was not worded well. I was at the match I know he was not dropped but was injured. However you have to admit KDUFFY never answers a simple question ie what would he do differently. Also he only cuts and pastes oparts of your comment. Such as the cut and paste where I said maybe Thorn found it hard to drop Bell when you are not allowed to sign replacements. My point been that he has now been allowed to sign a midfielder so maybe Bell will have to earn his crust. I personally believe Bell has a fantastic amount of skill but I think he needs to be challenged and needs to fight for his place. However I dont see him as an out and out winger. I think he is more of the head of the diamond type of player. However he wont remove Deegs and Norwood. He could be good to have on the bench though when he is fit.

 

---

[dongonzalos]

Also I have to say KDUFFY is the most negative person I have ever heard from ref 4 days ago......

4 Days Ago #6
kduffy

Assistant Manager

Join DateSep 2011Posts951
184 Like Received In 126 Posts

There are no positives. We are the worst team in the league. People will now start threads saying the next 3 games are the biggest in our history. No they are not they are just another 3 defeats. We are the team everyone wants to play. Spoke to a forest fan yesterday and he can't wait for next week.​

 

[Grendel]

Also I have to say KDUFFY is the most negative person I have ever heard from ref 4 days ago......

4 Days Ago #6
kduffy

Assistant Manager

Join DateSep 2011Posts951
184 Like Received In 126 Posts

There are no positives. We are the worst team in the league. People will now start threads saying the next 3 games are the biggest in our history. No they are not they are just another 3 defeats. We are the team everyone wants to play. Spoke to a forest fan yesterday and he can't wait for next week.​

184 likes versus your zero looks pretty positive from where I am sitting.

 

[Grendel]

184 likes versus your zero looks pretty positive from where I am sitting.

Correction I am being negative its 185 yours remains the same

 

[Grendel]

again I ask for solutions not moans who would you have had on the right wing laying that attacking role instead of Baker from that subs bench that was Thorn's options last night

Pointless question. Last night there were effectively no options the 10 outfield players that were available were selected so the format had to ultimately dictate itself. Normally we do not have an attacking role on the right as we prefer a diamond formation which effectively negates wide play. I still fail to understand the Bell reference and Thorn's bravery to drop him -- he would not be in his first choice 11 anyway.

 

[dongonzalos]

Again a politician attempting to manipulate stats. I have posted on her for the first time tonight unlike your 126 posts............

Also not a pointless question you say you would not have Bell and Baker, Bell was injured Baker played if you did not play Baker who would you play on the right wing.

Pointless negative comment unless you can back it up with a solution

 

[dongonzalos]

Also how many likes you get is pointless when there is no option for a dislike you could potenially have had 200 dislikes in response to your posts but no one will ever know..............