This is a terrible letter, a cock eyed rant, turning SBT into a shouty SISU out brigade. Getting personal with "Tim" shows a lack of professionalism and dignity which the Trust should rise above.
There is also the arrogant assumption that a show of hands at a forum represents the view of every Coventry supporter (and trust member)
I want the trust to take a really scrutineering, interregatory approach and engaging the RIGHT media to tell the story of the mismanagement of this club. Saturday afternoon jaunts to London and faintly ridiculous ultimatums mean that sadly the Trust, with behaviour like this risks being sidelined by ANY future owners.
No no! My tattoo simply read 'The SISU, The'
This is a terrible letter, a cock eyed rant, turning SBT into a shouty SISU out brigade. Getting personal with "Tim" shows a lack of professionalism and dignity which the Trust should rise above.
There is also the arrogant assumption that a show of hands at a forum represents the view of every Coventry supporter (and trust member)
I want the trust to take a really scrutineering, interregatory approach and engaging the RIGHT media to tell the story of the mismanagement of this club. Saturday afternoon jaunts to London and faintly ridiculous ultimatums mean that sadly the Trust, with behaviour like this risks being sidelined by ANY future owners.
For a (Supposedly) clever man/woman....Don't you ever read the CT? over 13k City supporters signing a petition....every poll put up on this forum puts SISU way down the list of wanted owners....That is just the ones that DID manage to vote
I've always said the so called "Brainy ones" are thick as fuck!
I see you all checked the trust website:facepalm:
I thought the petition was about keeping the club in Coventry and that it was general consensus that a lot of people from other clubs participated. So you can't take that number and claim the Trust represent 13k.
And poll's on this forum can't be representative either as it has become the center stage for sisu out followers.
I thought the petition was about keeping the club in Coventry and that it was general consensus that a lot of people from other clubs participated. So you can't take that number and claim the Trust represent 13k.
And poll's on this forum can't be representative either as it has become the center stage for sisu out followers.
Originally Posted by cashlessThis is a terrible letter, a cock eyed rant, turning SBT into a shouty SISU out brigade. Getting personal with "Tim" shows a lack of professionalism and dignity which the Trust should rise above.
There is also the arrogant assumption that a show of hands at a forum represents the view of every Coventry supporter (and trust member)
I want the trust to take a really scrutineering, interregatory approach and engaging the RIGHT media to tell the story of the mismanagement of this club. Saturday afternoon jaunts to London and faintly ridiculous ultimatums mean that sadly the Trust, with behaviour like this risks being sidelined by ANY future owners.
Of course it doesn't represent every City Supporter.........But it does represent well over 13k of supporters:facepalm:
He used 'don't know' when he could not justify or defend previous boards decisions.
He used 'can't tell' when he was questioned about groundshare and new stadium.
There's a difference.
And I actually didn't find him slippery or evasive - if only people would have let him explain without interrupting. But the forums are on youtube - go and listen if you really want to listen to what he said.
What's that meant to mean ?
That the Trust haven't said what the OP claims at all.
Although whether they have or not, I agree with it
What about the Clubs own survey then ,does that suffice !!
That the Trust haven't said what the OP claims at all.
Although whether they have or not, I agree with it
I was there so I don't need to listen again. You have backed everything SISU and the cronies have inflicted on this club throughout this sorry mess even heralding the infamous 'text a sub' idea as fantastic. I have no doubt at all you will still be backing them right up to the moment they put the final nail into the heart of this club. I would've been shocked beyond belief if you had found him slimy or evasive...after all he's speaking for you and the handful of other clueless idiots who are backing him all the way to finally kill off a once proud club.
Your reply is offensive and abusive. Please try to accept that you are no more or better supporter than I am.
Even if we groundshare there will be supporters following in thousands. Should we move to another stadium then there will be the same buzz as when we moved to the Ricoh.
Only difference would be, that should it happen, we will for the first time in decades become sustainable.
That's what it's all about. And yes, I support that.
This WILL again become a great club that will make us proud.
Whoever the owners are.
That's my opinion.
Your reply is offensive and abusive. Please try to accept that you are no more or better supporter than I am.
Even if we groundshare there will be supporters following in thousands. Should we move to another stadium then there will be the same buzz as when we moved to the Ricoh.
Only difference would be, that should it happen, we will for the first time in decades become sustainable.
That's what it's all about. And yes, I support that.
This WILL again become a great club that will make us proud.
Whoever the owners are.
That's my opinion.
Utterly clueless what I'm reading on here People who have been no where near any of this fervour against this move ,this sample is wrong /twisted Skewed whatever you wish to call it is real.
If these jokers move this club it is dead the Clubs own Data suggests an mere 25% will follow the club be it temporarily or pemenantly if it is outside the City.
Your reply is offensive and abusive. Please try to accept that you are no more or better supporter than I am.
Even if we groundshare there will be supporters following in thousands. Should we move to another stadium then there will be the same buzz as when we moved to the Ricoh.
Only difference would be, that should it happen, we will for the first time in decades become sustainable.
That's what it's all about. And yes, I support that.
This WILL again become a great club that will make us proud.
Whoever the owners are.
That's my opinion.
That's your (and I guess 98% of thi forums posters) opinion.You're deluded.:facepalm:
Yes exactly ,one stat you're willing to accept ,and one I don't dispute ,and one that will see this club drop through the floor of ambition on the pitch ,just for some corporates who bullied a few fans with Banners to get their Value into the books,and you wonder why people want them gone.So when Fisher says they expect 2-3k at an interim groundshare he could be right.
And if the team performs well that could attract more?
Yes exactly ,one stat you're willing to accept ,and one I don't dispute ,and one that will see this club drop through the floor of ambition on the pitch ,just for some corporates who bullied a few fans with Banners to get their Value into the books,and you wonder why people want them gone.
That's your (and I guess 98% of thi forums posters) opinion.
Which you are entitled to.
Apologies if you thought "clueless idiot" was abusive...I just feel fans like yourself are dangerous giving TF the false impression
Boys, Boys!
Lets not fight amongst ourselves!
We all want a good outcome for the club!
We all would hope for a new start but we might not get it.
We will soon know what the best deal presented to the administrator is.
If we are left with only SISU's proposals to go with - Then go with it!
Those proposals will not kill the club!
If we all get behind it we will still be a force to be reckoned with!
The only thing that might kill the club is
Not going with it!
imp:
Boys, Boys!</p>
<p>Lets not fight amongst ourselves!</p>
<p>We all want a good outcome for the club!</p>
<p>We all would hope for a new start but we might not get it.</p>
<p>We will soon know what the best deal presented to the administrator is.</p>
<p>If we are left with only SISU's proposals to go with - Then go with it!</p>
<p>Those proposals will not kill the club!</p>
<p>If we all get behind it we will still be a force to be reckoned with!</p>
<p>The only thing that might kill the club is </p>
<p>Not going with it!</p>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="images/smilies/hat.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Pimp" smilieid="48" class="inlineimg" />
<p>
Why do you trust a man and an organisation that has lied to us so many times before?
You're right, he's not to be trusted. I trust him as much as I would Elliott and Hoffman.
Always a handy cheap shot - the difference being that they haven't run the club (either literally or "into the ground") - but why let facts get in the way?
Well they have.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Or did I miss Elliott and Hoffman's times on the board (especially Elliott)?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>But, why not let THOSE facts get in the way?
Well they have.
Or did I miss Elliott and Hoffman's times on the board (especially Elliott)?
But, why not let THOSE facts get in the way?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?