Any businessman worth his salt would buy us up at what we are worth.
There is an organisation that maybe interested in the whole package after all they own the Ricoh?
'SISU Out' has the same problems as 'Pressley Out'....
Who will replace SISU if they went. I seriously doubt anyone better will want to buy us.....
Any the notion that SISU leaving would result in an attendance boost is laughable. The floating City fans have proved time and time again they only have interest in City for the big games. We may get an increased attendance for one home game, but we'd be back to 7-10000 before you know it.
It is my firm belief that that SISU issue, while it is a major issue for a lot of the hardcore fans, they are still attending City matches. But for the floating fans it is just another in a long line of excuses not to get behind the team. As soon as we returned to the Ricoh the 'NOPM' stance changed to 'too expensive'......
While I'm on a rant, the crazed logic of a lot of city fans really pisses me off.... we demand Conference level ticket prices, in a stadium that we believe is Premier League standard, but we won't turn up until money is also invested in the team.... something doesn't add up there...!
Not instantly, but they are the bigest part of the problem.
That'd be me out, if that ever happened.
That's jumping from one disasteful, horrific organisation owning us to another... who have in fact demonstrated even worse traits, if that's possible!
Desperation shouldn't see us go for the one-night stand and wake up with herpes later on.
Read the rest of my post it!!!
That part was a wind up you should know me by now..
Nonsense, a lot of people refuse to buy a ticket while they remain.
I agree J G , I haven't heard a murrmer regarding anti SISU chants since we returned, so that would suggest there are many who have stopped attending, while SISU remain in charge ?
Nonsense, a lot of people refuse to buy a ticket while they remain.
There may be people who simply will not go while SISU are in charge, but to imply that they number thousands is ridiculous. The missing thousands won't be here regularly until we are back in the premier league, higher championship, which is where they believe we belong. And it doesn't matter who the owners are.....
So you believe we are getting value for money?
By the way It is too expensive in my view but yes like a twat I still pay it.
You never know???
There is an organisation that maybe interested in the whole package after all they own the Ricoh?
Seriously their are some that would be interested if sisu walked away do a good deal on rent etcetera after all the Ricoh needs us so there is a way forward they have spent nothing they deserve nothing give it us back.
First of all you need the fans back on side to make a go at it Sisu will never get them back so they will never change anything except our standing in the league which while they are here can only get worse.
I maybe wrong in all this it is only an opinion but it looks clear cut to me as did the Northampton move as did the sale of the Ricoh all wrong, but so is sisu staying here wrong for our club.
ointlaugh:
The only reason financial speculators own us is because the 'traditional' business model just doesn't work, especially with us and the outlay needed.
Surprised you're advocating us being owned by a faceless suit wanting to make money out of us, btw...
Players on loan or obtained out of contract because nobody else wanted them. Backed up with 17 year olds with no experience.
Just as they refused to buy a ticket when we left Highfield Road because "the Ricoh is half way to fucking Nuneaton"
Just as they refused to buy a ticket when we signed Marlon King.
Just as they now refuse to buy a ticket because "the team is shit and prices are too high"
There may be people who simply will not go while SISU are in charge, but to imply that they number thousands is ridiculous. The missing thousands won't be here regularly until we are back in the premier league, higher championship, which is where they believe we belong. And it doesn't matter who the owners are.....
Clarke and Wilson?
I thought going back to the Ricoh was the answer to everything?
Who ?
Looks like my retirement didn't last long
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The freebie we got and the untried youth player.
SISU must go. But who the hell is going to want to buy a club with no ground?!? That is the real hammer blowPeople would buy Swansea. They only have a tenancy agreement. The fact our club is shockingly run is more of a problem than the lack of a freehold situation
You#'re the first person on this thread to mention the freehold...
SISU must go. But who the hell is going to want to buy a club with no ground?!? That is the real hammer blowPeople would buy Swansea. They only have a tenancy agreement. The fact our club is shockingly run is more of a problem than the lack of a freehold situation
Somebody bought Forest not that long ago. I was only talking to a Forest fan yesterday who was telling me how they don't own their ground either.
Swansea's ownership model is the one we should be looking at as the way forward. The trust could take it on with someone like Joe Elliott in partnership. I know certain people will slate the idea but they need to stop, take a deap breath and then try and work out why it's a worse idea than sticking with SISU. Answers on a postcard please.
the one thing for certain is that our decline will only increase while SISU are at the helm, people should think about that first before writing off the alternatives.
Given Wasps don't own the freehold either, and the 250 years is flagging that...
The point I'm making is why bring up freehold.
It's almost like you're looking for things that aren't there to beat people with...
Incidentally, Labovitch is also on quoted record as saying a long lease would do, so the freehold only mantra is so passe, and is only still propagated by posters on message boards.
I didn't bring it up.
You have on this thread.
I didn't.
The only person on this thread to mention freehold (until me, in response) was you.
I have to ask about your agenda to do so. It's more destructive to do that than to actually engage in what's been said, more destructive to close off debate about ownership structures by implementing the freehold or nowt flawed mantra, then to consider 'ownership' as a fluid term... You are Italiahorse after all, aren't you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?