Time's Up (1 Viewer)

usskyblue

Well-Known Member
No because it would be 3 up front.

Last 10 minutes at 1-0 down trying to go for it.

More of a 4 3 3.

Again, players don't have to be replaced with players in the same position.

If you seriously think bringing Tavares on was the answer, while simultaneously claiming MR got it tactically wrong.. I can’t help you m8
 

PUSB-We_are_going_up

Well-Known Member
Bedwetters 😂😂😂😂

don’t be so ridiculous
Aaron Abrams Parenting GIF by Children Ruin Everything
 

Nick

Administrator
If you seriously think bringing Tavares on was the answer, while simultaneously claiming MR got it tactically wrong.. I can’t help you m8

We have won 2 games in the last 16. Three like for like nonsense and refusal to change things during the game is clearly working for us isn't it.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
To have a shot at reaching 50 points this team needs to win 1 in 3 for the remaining 36 games. I don’t see where this comes from.
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
With investment in Jan (2 loans, maybe 1 perm) then yeah. This is the same team (- O’hare) that made it to the FA cup Semi’s and up until then was top 6

So why have we been so awful this year?
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member

Nick

Administrator
Because we aren’t playing Fabio Tavares according to some

Try context? I said at one nil down on 80 minutes against a tired defence that didn't like being pressed.

Still, you're happy being in the relegation zone as long as it's robins. Got to applaud those like for like changes every week while we watch the opposition want to win the game.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
Try context? I said at one nil down on 80 minutes against a tired defence that didn't like being pressed.

Still, you're happy being in the relegation zone as long as it's robins. Got to applaud those like for like changes every week while we watch the opposition want to win the game.
Who said I’m happy? I’m just not as reactionary as you.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top