it's not the way it reads from the telegraph article but of course that isn't a good way to evaluate the accounts, do we have a free link to look at them?
it's not the way it reads from the telegraph article but of course that isn't a good way to evaluate the accounts, do we have a free link to look at them?
You are much better served asking OSB than me, but the accounts do show that the 4.6mill is staff costs and the 5.6mill is administration completely separate numbers which is the way the article reads.