Are you still upset because I called him a little bitch and that he was crying in between disproving what you say and not letting you turn it into a discussion about Islam?.
There you go again. Trying to suggest I am upset when all I did was point out that your polemic use of language weakens your case. You’re unable to have a discussion without resorting to childish name calling.
And it’s obvious why you don’t want to talk about Islam even though it goes to the very heart of the debate. You don’t want me to embarrass you like I did with Tony when he posted about anti Semitism in Christianity.
I don’t even agree with a lot of what TR says about Muslims. But according to you and others on here I accept everything he says without question.
Where’s your evidenc? Oh right you don’t have any. You’re just making shit up.
So you didn't know about who populates it then if you didn't know the catchment area? That is exactly what my point was, that you only knew things about it that he had put out because of an agenda.
Maybe we just find it funnier to let you walk into things with your lack of knowledge and look silly? Saying "catchment area" is exactly that, nobody said it was located in Luton as it isn't. You thought you had hit a jackpot and were disproving people talking about the muslim population of Luton by saying where it was.
It's actually Onley as well.
My point was that the term “catchment area” was misleading because if someone didn’t know the prison was in Rugby they would assume it was in Luton. Assuming Tony knew it’s location, his use of the phrase was disingenuous.
As I said before, if I pulled you and others up for every misleading use of language I’d have to make this a FT job. Anyway people can make up their own minds. You’re destroying your own arguments with the polemic language, ad hominems, and straw manning.
It's on his prison complaint form that was posted in this thread.
And as I pointed out the “racist” part entered the discussion only because the complaint form required a box to be filled. But you and Nick try to spin it as being a complaint about racism when it wasn’t. And nicks now trying to wriggle out of it by saying he never claimed that TR had used the word “racism”. Wriggle, wriggle, wriggle.
I see you still refuse to condemn the verses in the Quran and Hadith that call for the murder of Jews, gays, and apostates. People can draw their own conclusions about your motives.
Of course Tony knew his location, he lives by it. The catchment area was relevant in the discussion.
You are the one making it about language because I called him a little bitch.
And as I pointed out the “racist” part entered the discussion only because the complaint form required a box to be filled. But you and Nick try to spin it as being a complaint about racism when it wasn’t. And nicks now trying to wriggle out of it by saying he never claimed that TR had used the word “racism”. Wriggle, wriggle, wriggle.
I see you still refuse to condemn the verses in the Quran and Hadith that call for the murder of Jews, gays, and apostates. People can draw their own conclusions about your motives.
You're Jewish and gay?One of my best friends is Jewish and I am also good friends with his uncle who also happens to be Jewish AND gay.
I also live in the UK's gay capital.
I'll let people draw conclusions from that, thanks.
No, what you mean is you want to steer it away from a discussion I know more about to something else.I’m making it about language because I am trying to help you make a stronger argument so we can have an intelligent discussion.
And as I pointed out the “racist” part entered the discussion only because the complaint form required a box to be filled. But you and Nick try to spin it as being a complaint about racism when it wasn’t. And nicks now trying to wriggle out of it by saying he never claimed that TR had used the word “racism”. Wriggle, wriggle, wriggle.
I see you still refuse to condemn the verses in the Quran and Hadith that call for the murder of Jews, gays, and apostates. People can draw their own conclusions about your motives.
It was a tick box, pretty sure it isn't required.
I didn't say he used the word racism, I quoted exactly what I meant.
You said it was a complaint about racism. Your post was meant to mislead anyone who didn’t know what the complaint was really about. Glad to see you finally admitted it was just a tick box.
But even now you are making assertions without evidence. How do you know a tick wasn’t required in order for the complaint to be processed? More important, how do you know that TR didn’t think it was required?
Are you going to retract your erroneous assertion that it was a complaint about racism?
95% of the Muslim don’t actually followed that doctrine though. Until very recently the Muslim community has lived in this country without a second thought.
I’m amazed you have any time for it as you are clearly far from stupid.
The only relevant stats are uk ones.I'm not sure where you get the 95% figure from. In addition your post refers to "Muslims" whereas the survey data show that the views differ greatly across countries.
How about providing links next time? Here's some for you to be going on with, including some from the UK which refute your 95% claim:
83% of Pakistanis support stoning adulterers
78% of Pakistanis support killing apostates
Pakistan: New Poll Shows 78 Percent of Pakistanis Support Death Penalty for Leaving Islam | Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.)
ICM Poll: 40% of British Muslims want Sharia in the UK
Poll reveals 40pc of Muslims want sharia law in UK
GfK NOP: 28% of British Muslims want Britain to be an Islamic state
http://www.civitas.org.uk/pdf/ShariaLawOrOneLawForAll.pdf
NOP Research: 68% of British Muslims support the arrest and prosecution of anyone who insults Islam;
Many British Muslims Put Islam First
http://www.webcitation.org/5xkMGAEvY
Pew Research (2010): 82% of Egyptian Muslims favor stoning adulterers
70% of Jordanian Muslims favor stoning adulterers
42% of Indonesian Muslims favor stoning adulterers
82% of Pakistanis favor stoning adulterers
56% of Nigerian Muslims favor stoning adulterers
Muslim Publics Divided on Hamas and Hezbollah
ICM Poll (2016): 23% of British Muslim support the introduction of Sharia in the UK "instead of British Law"
More than half of Muslims want gay sex to be outlawed, ICM poll reveals | Daily Mail Online
ICM Poll (2016): 21% of British Muslims decline to condemn stoning adulterers.
More than half of Muslims want gay sex to be outlawed, ICM poll reveals | Daily Mail Online
The only relevant stats are uk ones.
The only relevant stats are uk ones.
I included both UK and non-UK because Grendel referred generically to "Muslims". I see you have no comment about the UK surveys.
Oh I looked at one - the Sharia law one - I assume it’s the discredited rubbish by the policy exchange - a far right group with a racist agenda.
If so It’s a discredited survey. I can’t be bothered to look at the rest.
I do I looked at one that I assume was a discredited far right one and clearly meant uk Muslims. Catholics in Africa want homosexuals executed so of course we can only focus on Britain
It might help to stop making assumptions (like your 95% one that was plucked out of your ass) and actually look at the evidence.
Ok it was the daily mail so mmmmmmmm and I’m happy that people feel strongly about their faith and hold to it mostly but where the acts they are condoning are things like murder you have to question its legitimacyI included both UK and non-UK because Grendel referred generically to "Muslims". I see you have no comment about the UK surveys.
So is this a poll that’s 12 years old?
One of my best friends is Jewish and I am also good friends with his uncle who also happens to be Jewish AND gay.
I also live in the UK's gay capital.
I'll let people draw conclusions from that, thanks.
It's OnleyI knew full well the location and population of Onsley. If you look back you will see I was responding Tony’s comment about Onsley being in TR’s “catchment area” which was obviously misleading because it suggested that Onsley was near to Luton. Maybe you and Tony should choose your words more carefully.
It's Onley
Sent from my 5010X using Tapatalk
Of course Tony knew his location, he lives by it. The catchment area was relevant in the discussion.
You are the one making it about language because I called him a little bitch.
Not only do I live near by I know people who work there very well so was able to fact check his claims very easily and confirm that he was always going to moved from Hull to a prison in the catchment area for where he lives as soon as space became available, that just so happened to be Onley. Just to be clear I didn’t know he was there until it was reported that his little protest group were planning on going there to protest after the London protest. It never happened apparently in the end.
Probably best. Given the mentality of his followers.I was trying to keep it simple...
Although that sort of shit is also in the Bible, which was a one of the sources Mohamed plagiarised to invent his religion as well as earlier myths and existing Arab beliefs, laws & customs.There are Imams who say it’s fine for Muslim men to rape non Muslim women because it’s in the Quran and Hadith. I’ve never heard a Christian or atheist say anything like that. Hence you are making a false equivalenc.
And as I pointed out the “racist” part entered the discussion only because the complaint form required a box to be filled. But you and Nick try to spin it as being a complaint about racism when it wasn’t. And nicks now trying to wriggle out of it by saying he never claimed that TR had used the word “racism”. Wriggle, wriggle, wriggle.
I see you still refuse to condemn the verses in the Quran and Hadith that call for the murder of Jews, gays, and apostates. People can draw their own conclusions about your motives.
It might help to stop making assumptions (like your 95% one that was plucked out of your ass) and actually look at the evidence.
25,000 is way too many ! That volume of 'Enemies of the state' doesn't sit well with me at all. I do agree with you though, if we hadn't interfered with Middle East and North African dictatorships then there wouldn't be a fraction of the problem.The comment was relating to extremism. There are I think around 2.6 million Muslims in the uk. Extremists identified are at 25,000 according to reports. So even if you factor out the very young and the very elderly then it’s never going to exceed 5% that practice extreme behaviour.
The point was that the vast majority exist without any interference into the uk way of life.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?