Tommy Robinson (1 Viewer)

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Talking of convicted criminals Tommy Robinson guilty over Facebook broadcast

Interesting he’s yet again admitted conning the people who he’s convinced he’s a bastion of free speech “The 36-year-old, from Luton, had denied any wrongdoing, saying he did not believe he was breaching reporting restrictions and only referred to information that was already in the public domain“. Seriously if you don’t want to believe me when I say he’s a conman at least pay attention to what he’s saying himself. If having a stage name isn’t confirmation enough for you that it’s all an act what he’s stood up in court and confessed under oath should be.
 
Last edited:

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
I've heard he's going to be put in a cell with jabba the hut and will be forced to sit at his feet like a slave because of Muslims.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I wonder if his original sentence of 13 months will be increased. He pleaded guilty on that occasion whereas he’s pleaded not guilty this time.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Did he defend himself in court like he said he was going to?
Always a bad move and generally a tactic employed by people who think they are a lot cleverer than they actually are and sociopaths.
 

djr8369

Well-Known Member
Talking of convicted criminals Tommy Robinson guilty over Facebook broadcast

Interesting he’s yet again admitted conning the people who he’s convinced he’s a bastion of free speech “The 36-year-old, from Luton, had denied any wrongdoing, saying he did not believe he was breaching reporting restrictions and only referred to information that was already in the public domain“. Seriously if you don’t want to believe me when I say he’s a conman at least pay attention to what he’s saying himself. If having a stage name isn’t confirmation enough for you that it’s all an act what he’s stood up in court and confessed under oath should be.

Brilliant!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Read back what you've just posted............You are one sick person.......Like it with kids yeah ? Sick c**t.

What the quite literal fuck are you going on about. Tommy Robinson came closer to getting them off than their own defence lawyers. You need to go and have a long hard think to yourself, you have issues.
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
Piss off

Nah bored with lefties on it.....Will be raising a glass or two when Boris is are NEW PM.......EU thread will go melt down :)
As will a few who are in there day in, year out.
 

Westendlad

Well-Known Member
What the quite literal fuck are you going on about. Tommy Robinson came closer to getting them off than their own defence lawyers. You need to go and have a long hard think to yourself, you have issues.
Only issues i have is
What the quite literal fuck are you going on about. Tommy Robinson came closer to getting them off than their own defence lawyers. You need to go and have a long hard think to yourself, you have issues.
You're the one with issues if you slate a person exposing child molesters..........
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Only issues i have is

You're the one with issues if you slate a person exposing child molesters..........
He wasn't exposing them was he? His own defence was that he was only repeating what the BBC had already reported. He was doing it for his own reasons and might have inadvertently got their trial thrown out but fortunately didn't.
 

Westendlad

Well-Known Member
He wasn't exposing them was he? His own defence was that he was only repeating what the BBC had already reported. He was doing it for his own reasons and might have inadvertently got their trial thrown out but fortunately didn't.
Oh shut up.............No one would of known (Or cared) about the case until he exposed it.........I would really like to someone to explain why it was so so wrong to expose a gang of child molesters )
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Only issues i have is

You're the one with issues if you slate a person exposing child molesters..........

He again stood up in court today and admitted he wasn’t exposing them. He’s told you in plain English that he’s taking the piss out of everyone who buys his act. He’s closer to getting them of Scot free than exposing them. Here’s what he said “The 36-year-old, from Luton, had denied any wrongdoing, saying he did not believe he was breaching reporting restrictions and only referred to information that was already in the public domain“.

They're his words not mine, again “already in the public domain”. My issue is with people who deliver on a platter grooming gangs an angle to get away with it and that’s your mate Tommy. Why are you making up excuses for paedophile enablers?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Oh shut up.............No one would of known (Or cared) about the case until he exposed it.........I would really like to someone to explain why it was so so wrong to expose a gang of child molesters )

It was already in the public domain. Tommy confirmed in court.

Why do you excuse the actions of someone who came closer to getting them of than their own defence lawyers?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top