Tonights Team (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Hulb
- Start date
mark82
Moderator
Don't think it's meant to be a 4-4-2 with wingers. More likely the usual diamond formation.
What is the alternative to Clarke?
skybluebeduff
Well-Known Member
I gotta tell the wife yet that i'm going to the game :facepalm: ooops
skybluebeduff
Well-Known Member
I say risk Eastwood upfont with Nimely, let the crowd decide his fate.
mark82
Moderator
Wasn't sure tbh. If that is the case Clarke will have to play. We are really down to bare bones in defence. Wonder if there is a clause to call McPake back?
skyblueinBaku
Well-Known Member
It's got to the stage where AT has to see who turns up fit enough to play before he can decide on a line up and formation.
tower_skyblue
Member
We can always text in to make a substitution if the formation isn't working.
skybluegod
Well-Known Member
-----------------------murphy---------------
----christie-----keogh-----craine----clarke
-----------------------norwood----------------
---------------bell-----------------deegs-----
----------------------sheffers----------------
----------------nimley-------platt
subs:dunn,willis,bigi,baker,eastwood
think eastwood will get about 20mins tonight as platt will be getting tired might even start
----christie-----keogh-----craine----clarke
-----------------------norwood----------------
---------------bell-----------------deegs-----
----------------------sheffers----------------
----------------nimley-------platt
subs:dunn,willis,bigi,baker,eastwood
think eastwood will get about 20mins tonight as platt will be getting tired might even start
J
Jack Griffin
Guest
That is a bit harsh, but we sure do need better if we're to have any chance of surviving. Should be a bench player.
mark82
Moderator
He's the best we have got at the moment. From what I have heard he has been playing well recently, although we do need someone who can actually score goals desperately.
DiveDiveWhereverYouMayBe
New Member
The thing about Platt is, if he has an off day, he is liable to look awful. If his flick ons and hold up play is off, he can't really offer anything else. No pace (which impacts on his closing down and ability to make tackles), no real eye for a pass or huge goal threat. This is why I thought he got a little unfair stick upon arrival. It is somewhat similar to the situation with Andy Thorn... if you were expecting a world beater; you should have borne in mind that he would probably even describe himself as a journeyman striker, playing at his highest ever level, 33 years old, and cost £25k (rising to £50k depending on add ons). He comes across as a really likeable bloke and, on his day, offers a real problem to defences. Is he the answer to our rise to mid-table mediocrity? No. Is anyone else on our books? Er, well, to be honest, no.
Otis
Well-Known Member
Haven't told my missus either.
Why do you think I am sweating like mad in the kitchen at the moment trying to conjure up a special meal?
Ready by 5.30, eaten by 6 pm., tell her at 6.25 p.m., leave for the match at 6.30 pm.
.
Disorganised1
New Member
Haven't told my missus either.
Why do you think I am sweating like mad in the kitchen at the moment trying to conjure up a special meal?
Ready by 5.30, eaten by 6 pm., tell her at 6.25 p.m., leave for the match at 6.30 pm.
.
collect divorce papers on way back in.
stupot07
Well-Known Member
We'd probably have to send norwood back to free up wages to recall McPake...
Mr T - Sukka!
Active Member
GK - DUNN
RB - KEOUGH
CB - CAMERON
LB - HUSSEY
RM - BELL
CM - DEEGAN
CM - CRANIE
CM - BIGI
LM - BAKER
ST - NIMLEY
ST - MCSHEFFERY
Going for a complete mix up as what we are currently doing is not working. Got to change if what you are doing is not working.
RB - KEOUGH
CB - CAMERON
LB - HUSSEY
RM - BELL
CM - DEEGAN
CM - CRANIE
CM - BIGI
LM - BAKER
ST - NIMLEY
ST - MCSHEFFERY
Going for a complete mix up as what we are currently doing is not working. Got to change if what you are doing is not working.
mark82
Moderator
I actually think when all players are fit a 3-5-2/5-3-2 formation might suit us, with wing backs. I would go with (assuming fully fit squad):
GK - Murphy
RWB - Christie
CB - Cranie
CB - Hreidersson
CB - Keogh
LWB - Hussey
(D)CM - Deegan/Norwood
(D)CM - Clingan
(A)CM - Baker
ST - Nimely
ST - McSheffrey
Mary_Mungo_Midge
Well-Known Member
Platt should be nowhere near the starting 11. However, I agree he has to start as we have nothing better.
Over his career he's not even been a one-in-five striker; and less than one-in-ten accounting for all his appearances in a City shirt. Yes, he grafts - of a fashion - but that's not enough to command a starting berth at this level
Over his career he's not even been a one-in-five striker; and less than one-in-ten accounting for all his appearances in a City shirt. Yes, he grafts - of a fashion - but that's not enough to command a starting berth at this level
Skybluesimon
Member
The team is
Murphy
Christie
Keogh
Cranie
Clarke
Norwood
Baker
Deegan
Mcsheffery
Nimely
Platt
SUBS
Dunn
Willis
Gael (he's back!)
Freddy
Ruffles
Murphy
Christie
Keogh
Cranie
Clarke
Norwood
Baker
Deegan
Mcsheffery
Nimely
Platt
SUBS
Dunn
Willis
Gael (he's back!)
Freddy
Ruffles
AFCCOVENTRY
Well-Known Member
Very weak team. We will be lucky to score tonight.
Disorganised1
New Member
Win tonight - 3 - 2
