SeaSeeEffCee
Well-Known Member
They’ve made some good signings, will be up there I’m sure.
They’ve made some good signings, will be up there I’m sure.Ive got them down as play off contenders
Cameron Archer would be ideal, could be holding out to see if Villa will let him come to us.We know that Robins wants 2 more strikers …. But who ? I don’t consider the Romanian to be a striker, advanced midfielder / number 10 but not a striker. The United lad is a wide player not a striker.
If it was Sharp he would be here by now.
Gallagher rumour dismissed
Other rumoured players dismissed or moved elsewhere ….
He’s meant to be going to Stuttgart.Undav going to be available...
'Speaking after the 2-1 defeat that rounded off the Seagulls' Premier League Summer Series in the United States, the Italian said: "Danny [Welbeck] is in fantastic physical condition. In the striker positions I have three players.
"We will see what happens for Undav in the coming days in the transfer market, but Joao Pedro, Welbeck and [Evan] Ferguson are enough."'
Incredible raw pace …. He made our fullbacks look like they were running through treacleI wouldn’t mind taking that Malcolm Ebiowei from Palace who used to play for Derby, he was very exciting against us
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Could work well up front with Billy SharpAccording to Alan Nixon
Wonder if Antoine Semenyo would be available for a loan? Couldn’t get into the Bournmouth team last year and they’ve signed a couple of attackers since.
According to Alan Nixon (!) Tom Cannon will leave Everton for the season if, and only if, someone is willing to pay a £1m loan fee.
Fans of Sunderland, Preston, Stoke Birmingham and Sheffield Weds all seem to think they’re on the verge of signing him
He’s also saying McNally is off to Stoke.
The idea that Stoke came to the CBS, thrashed us 4-0 and then decided *from that game* that the players they wanted to add to their squad were Michael Rose and Like McNally beggars belief.
We probably don’t want to loan him again because it’s about time we bought our own players.FFS. Burnley let McNally go on loan to Stoke, but not Cov, what's that all about?
Don't tell me money
Bit of a leap!? They happily sold us Bobby Thomas without trying extort Hamer out of us!Never likely for us, Burnley were always going to say to us the only way we could get him was by selling them Hamer.
We probably don’t want to loan him again because it’s about time we bought our own players.
It’s a hunch I have that there will be provisions to sign Binks on a permanent.
Finally you get something rightBurnley are cunts
Burnley are cunts
Massive shame about McNally - Unpopular opinion but he was everything our supporters thought Dominic Hyam was and more
Excellent Championship defender
He’s not my type mate I prefer blokes with a buzz cut like BidwellWhy don't you marry him then?
He's a LCB so that's a bad comparisonIs Binks better than McNally ?
FFS. Burnley let McNally go on loan to Stoke, but not Cov, what's that all about?
Don't tell me money
We did not want him on loan
He’s also saying McNally is off to Stoke.
The idea that Stoke came to the CBS, thrashed us 4-0 and then decided *from that game* that the players they wanted to add to their squad were Michael Rose and Like McNally beggars belief.
We did not want him on loan
Yes because the season only lasts one game doesn’t it?
I think we want to invest in our own assets rather than lining the pockets of the premier league clubs whilst also developing their assets.We don’t want to pay any loan fees and would rather put that towards the transfer fee.
Could not possibly be more wrong.I think we want to invest in our own assets rather than lining the pockets of the premier league clubs whilst also developing their assets.
That said we will have a mic again this window I’m sure but with a greater balance towards owning our own players.
I’m sure it was not lost on King that having 5 players on loan and playing 4 of them regularly meant we started this summer having lost half the team and with little to build on.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?