Transfer targets (6 Viewers)
- Thread starter We'll_live_and_die
- Start date
D
Deleted member 9744
Guest
Problem is the amounts concerned would be peanuts to a side like Burnley.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Yeah but Burnley going up is a different prospect to Burnley going down.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
He still hasn't been back for long. Same as it was crazy to write him off after a couple of sub assistants, it doesn't seem unwise for the club to see if he can get through this period of fixtures unscathed.
Offer him a deal start of January, see where we stand then.
Matt smith
Well-Known Member
Is he worth keeping till the summer?
How much would we get in January
How much would we get in January
mrtrench
Well-Known Member
Parachutes. If Cal wants it then they will pay.
Covcraig@bury
Well-Known Member
He’s not signing simples
Agree.
Matt smith
Well-Known Member
That winger from palace
or Ben doak
or Ben doak
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Greggs
Well-Known Member
And Martin Waghorn
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Wedgey Wright?
baldy
Well-Known Member
Nah - bit too old now at 32
Martin180
Well-Known Member
![](data:image/svg+xml;charset=utf-8,<svg height="200px" width="291px" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1"/>)
Happy_Martian
Well-Known Member
I was challenged on here last week (?), when I said if he didn't sign then sell, that the club hadn't given him a contract. Have we heard that a contract has actually been passed over to his agent ? Or is all this just speculation between antsy members wanting something done ?
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Best guess so far seems to be his demands are known and the club haven’t met them.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Interested we are 6days from start of window and there’s not a rumour to be found
GaryJones
Well-Known Member
My feeling is that he will not sign anything and will go on a free in the summer.
I would be pretty pissed off if this happens. The club stood by him when he was out for so long and the least he should do in my opinion is sign for another year or two and have a buyout clause inserted.
At least that way we both get something if he goes in the near future.
I don’t buy the standard footballer bullshit line that I just want to concentrate on playing (that’s bollocks) - sort your contract out on your days off for fuck sake.
Maybe the contract has not been put in front of him - by his agent!!
I’m sure the club would have offered something by now.
I would be pretty pissed off if this happens. The club stood by him when he was out for so long and the least he should do in my opinion is sign for another year or two and have a buyout clause inserted.
At least that way we both get something if he goes in the near future.
I don’t buy the standard footballer bullshit line that I just want to concentrate on playing (that’s bollocks) - sort your contract out on your days off for fuck sake.
Maybe the contract has not been put in front of him - by his agent!!
I’m sure the club would have offered something by now.
Legia Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
I think O'Hare's positive influence is such that he does deserve to be the highest earner at the club, but whether that's enough to keep him goodness knows. Knowing that his contract up at the end of the season, I can't see any offer in January higher than £1m. If that is the case in my opinion we may as well keep him, as any replacement would need time to settle in, and have a negative impact on the team's prospects for the rest of the season. As with Hamer, if there is the remotest chance we can keep him then we have to try to do so, even if we do ultimately lose out.
Last edited:
Astute
Well-Known Member
O'Hare hasn't gone yet. And none of us know what sort of contract has been offered. And where is the evidence that one hasn't been offered.
My guess would be O'Hare wanted a decent contract but we were weary of giving a big contract to a player who was just coming back from a second long term injury. It could easily be prove your value before you get to sign. Can you imagine giving a big contract then finding out the injuries have taken their toll. Remember his goal where he held his hand to his ear like making a phone call? 'I'm back where's my contract'
Yes O'Hare is of value. But who would risk a big fee on a player that has spent most of the last 2 years out injured? He is worth more than a couple of million to us. Could be the difference between also rans and winning the playoffs. I'm sure he would prefer to be in the Prem with us than another relegation battle team.
My guess would be O'Hare wanted a decent contract but we were weary of giving a big contract to a player who was just coming back from a second long term injury. It could easily be prove your value before you get to sign. Can you imagine giving a big contract then finding out the injuries have taken their toll. Remember his goal where he held his hand to his ear like making a phone call? 'I'm back where's my contract'
Yes O'Hare is of value. But who would risk a big fee on a player that has spent most of the last 2 years out injured? He is worth more than a couple of million to us. Could be the difference between also rans and winning the playoffs. I'm sure he would prefer to be in the Prem with us than another relegation battle team.
Northeast sky blue
Well-Known Member
If O'Hare is to be sold in January, then hopefully his replacement is already lined up, along with the Hamer one and being greedy, cover for Wright and Sakamoto
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
I can easily see a multi million pound offer from a Burnley
He’s struggled to make an impact this season and has only recently started to score/create goals. The obsession with him on this board is one of our strangest recurring bits.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Any rumours??
Good or bad there’s no talk of anything??
Wonder if any will move on?
Good or bad there’s no talk of anything??
Wonder if any will move on?
Someone mentioned Josh Windass on BBC CWR last night
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
That’s because one of those content farms did a “5 players Coventry could look at” listicles.