Flying Fokker
Well-Known Member
And the small matter of losing Hamer should focus the mind.
And the small matter of losing Hamer should focus the mind.Sounds like he wants £25k/wk as that’s what Wright is on.
That’s £5.2m over a four year deal, though it would probably be 3.5 so more like £4.5m
I’d argue we’ll be spending that on wages and fee for a replacement anyway. £10k/wk is £1.8m over three and a half years, and that’s at the cheap end. So the question is is he worth £2.5m give or take? I think the answer is obviously yes. For about the same cash if not a little more you’re getting Scott Twine who has hardly set the division alight.
Delusional to think he does. The club would dispense with him if of no use.Bollox
Course he does we gsve him his first team chance and have paid his wages for no work performance for almost a year!
Doesn’t mean he’ll stay but there’s mutual respect there
The things certain are
He will be sold if he doesn’t sign during January
Robins loves him
Ohare loves robins
He’s hugely popular in the squad
He’s hugely popular to the fans
he’s the last of the 3 stars but we are already seeing the rise of others
Twine not good enough for me. Burnley happy to let him go, every time I’ve seen him just been bystander.Add twine into the deal and maybe it might be a goer
We should have the £2mil anyway for the Hamer fee. It should be Styles *and* O'Hare going forward.I didn't say he was I just meant you get 2 million which pays for his fee and you own him for 4 years or whatever. No brainer to me. O'Hare would still have to be replaced elsewhere.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
For the injury in his workplace that he suffered, while giving full commitment to his employer.and have paid his wages for no work performance for almost a year!
For the injury in his workplace that he suffered, while giving full commitment to his employer.
What else should we do?!?
Not laterly though!I think Pete is Peter Bone with that attitude
CourseFor the injury in his workplace that he suffered, while giving full commitment to his employer.
What else should we do?!?
Sounds like he wants £25k/wk as that’s what Wright is on.
That’s £5.2m over a four year deal, though it would probably be 3.5 so more like £4.5m
I’d argue we’ll be spending that on wages and fee for a replacement anyway. £10k/wk is £1.8m over three and a half years, and that’s at the cheap end. So the question is is he worth £2.5m give or take? I think the answer is obviously yes. For about the same cash if not a little more you’re getting Scott Twine who has hardly set the division alight.
Can we please stop using this ill informed rationale.For the injury in his workplace that he suffered, while giving full commitment to his employer.
What else should we do?!?
Nonsense. If O'Hare had not recovered we wouldn't offer him a contract. There would have been no loyalty to him.Can we please stop using this ill informed rationale.
the point being made is that we assume Coventry City continued to pay COH in full while he was injured. Therefore some loyalty back would be good.
No employer is legally obligated to pay any employee on long term sick in full.
In COH”s case I suspect being paid in full was part of his personal contract with the club, and that is where the legal obligation kicks in.
however the crux of the argument is about his moral obligation not his legal one.
Didn’t king say that we’ll be making some signings in January? Something along the lines of not as many as in the summer but fans can expect some new signings.I think a lot of fans will he disappointed as can’t see us doing a lot. Will have to offload a couple first I should think but not sure who Robins will let go - more to free up space than wages.
Still think we need another centre forward option to compete with Simms. Godden just not sharp enough anymore.
And another midfielder, box to box. But as Robins always says, it has to be better than what we’ve got and it isn’t too bad at the moment. Not sure who is out there.
Nonsense. If O'Hare had not recovered we wouldn't offer him a contract. There would have been no loyalty to him.
O'Hare has given us great service and I hope he will stay epwith us but this criticism of him is complete unfair.
If Burnley are looking for a saviour to stay up, I don't think Calum is their answer. He will do well in a progressive side but not one in a dogfight.I can easily see a multi million pound offer from a Burnley
Six months to get up to speed?If Burnley are looking for a saviour to stay up, I don't think Calum is their answer. He will do well in a progressive side but not one in a dogfight.
We did and that was impressive, in our favour, made us look like a caring compassionate club, the kind you'd want to join as they looked after their players. That reflected well on us.We gave Jones new contracts though.
We don’t need to be hypothetical though because he has recovered.Nonsense. If O'Hare had not recovered we wouldn't offer him a contract. There would have been no loyalty to him.
O'Hare has given us great service and I hope he will stay epwith us but this criticism of him is complete unfair.
Nonsense. If O'Hare had not recovered we wouldn't offer him a contract. There would have been no loyalty to him.
O'Hare has given us great service and I hope he will stay epwith us but this criticism of him is complete unfair.
Because we thought he would recover. We didn't do so out of loyalty.We gave Jones new contracts though.
Sisu are more caring than Doug?Because we thought he would recover. We didn't do so out of loyalty.
We did and that was impressive, in our favour, made us look like a caring compassionate club, the kind you'd want to join as they looked after their players. That reflected well on us.
Not paying a contracted player any time they're unavailable to play however...!
Add twine into the deal and maybe it might be a goer
He was working for almost a year to get back to the levels of performance that you’re seeing now - that in itself has been a full-time job.we gsve him his first team chance and have paid his wages for no work performance for almost a year!
You see of course partially correct.He was working for almost a year to get back to the levels of performance that you’re seeing now - that in itself has been a full-time job.
I like Styles, but I think selling O’Hare and spending the money on him would be an obvious downgrade. If £2 million was a steal then someone would have met that release clause by now.They had some very good players tbf, Styles is one of them. Slept on on this forum. 2 million would be a steal.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Unless it's foregone conclusion?I like Styles, but I think selling O’Hare and spending the money on him would be an obvious downgrade. If £2 million was a steal then someone would have met that release clause by now.
He's a different player, I'm just saying you use the funds on someone like Styles and you've got yourself a good player from the proceeds vs losing him for nothing, its just an example, I'm probably not getting my point across very well.I like Styles, but I think selling O’Hare and spending the money on him would be an obvious downgrade. If £2 million was a steal then someone would have met that release clause by now.
We wouldn’t get much money for him in Jan considering he can go for a free in summer, so keeping him till the end of the season will give us the best chance of a push for the playoffs
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?