I’m genuinely not trying to be pedantic and the original point of the post was why people elect to take a long distance loan when an equivalent one on the doorstep was available. Transfers are different; players know (or at least intend at point of signing) to be at a place for 3 years or so, so will most likely move to the area. With a 6-10 month loan, why commute / live in digs / stay at another player's house as some have suggested if you could just as easily take a local loan and stay home?
It was a simple musing.
O’Hare is a prime example. I’m fairly certain that the commute from Solihull to Ryton wasn’t daunting.
I’d guess Panzo didn’t need to stay in digs near Cov.
With O’Brien, it was a simple question of why choose Middlesbrough over us for a loan? Middlesbrough (unless you’ve been kicked in the head by a horse or think maps tell lies) is an unnecessary upheaval.
Latterly, in the real world, particularly post Covid, people are less inclined to travel to work. (Many have got used to working from home where their “own time” starts later and finishes earlier. Ie, logging on at 9 means you are having “own time” until 9. Jumping in a car at 8 after putting a suit on etc to get to an office at 9 means “own time” ends earlier than 8. People have started to see the benefits of not wasting time sat in traffic jams, burning fuel, wasting time and money.)
First question I ask when employing people is “where do you live”?. People who have a 10 minute journey are more likely to stay with a firm then those the other side of town who need to travel an hour.
Back to original point:
4/5 hour round trips to go training for 2 hours is a bit bonkers.
For loans, particularly young O’Hare types who probably live at home near their boyhood club, shouldn’t we be looking closer to home?
Have the (spits as types) Villa got any decent young AM’s?
Is Rico Richards any good?
I always thought Louie Barry a decent loan shout.