Trump is my favourite comedian of the year already (3 Viewers)

Como

Well-Known Member
Quite simple really, there will be more than 2 candidates but only 2 who can win.

In most places the result is given, hence the Nancy Pelosi glass of water comment:



So like all places you either make a protest vote, do not bother or hold your nose and pick one.

Now the Dems decided to go for one of the nastiest candidates they could find for some reason in Hillary and now they have someone who should clearly be in a OAP home, well unless you think the White House could be classified as such.

Most people I know, I was going to say all but have not had that conversation with everyone want another choice.

Amusingly Trump is an old fashioned New York Democrat, I am sure he would have stood as a D if that opportunity had been available.

Michelle has more sense, and Newsom? really slimy bastard and if I was standing against him I would hold all my events in San Fran.
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
Yeah.

And on the other point, I am going to vote Labour, but if I found out Starmer said that same remark about women, as Trump, I wouldn't vote for him and would just go Independent, or Green.

Youre going to vote Labour.

How on earth can you come on here and lecture anybody about politics?
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Youre going to vote Labour.

How on earth can you come on here and lecture anybody about politics?
What you talking about?

We have to get the Tories out, because they have made such a mess of things.

The only other party that can actually get into power, is Labour.

I feel I have to vote Labour.

As I explained, our MP is a Tory and we have to get him out because he is useless. Even the Tory supporters here say that about him. They complain down here that they never, ever seen him.

And thirdly, when have I lectured people on here? 🤷

If I thought a good independent could get in here, I would vote for them.

Bottom line is, it's either Labour or Tory. They are the only two choices and after Boris cocked things up and lied and cheated and then Liz Truss nearly collapsed the economy, I have no other choice anyway.

I have no idea what you are talking about. 🤷
 

SIR ERNIE

Well-Known Member
Looks like it only took 50 years for Nixon’s ‘If the President does it it’s not illegal’ to come true
So to clarify, you're happy for Obama to be at risk of imprisonment for his drone strike of two American citizens.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
So to clarify, you're happy for Obama to be at risk of imprisonment for his drone strike of two American citizens and Biden for his illegal release of violent criminal migrants into America.
You think that I have a ‘team’ here, I don’t. A crime is a crime and allowing anyone to be immune from prosecution is incredibly dangerous.

Trump for one should have been locked up for what he incited in Washington and for quite deliberately trying to manipulate the votes in Georgia.
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
You think that I have a ‘team’ here, I don’t. A crime is a crime and allowing anyone to be immune from prosecution is incredibly dangerous.

Trump for one should have been locked up for what he incited in Washington and for quite deliberately trying to manipulate the votes in Georgia.
Prince Andrew is bullet proof!
As is/was most of the Royal Family
As was Jimmy Saville.
As was Tony Blair
As is every Prime Minister
And senior Masons
And senior Lawyers
And senior Bankers
Any former member of the IRA
And senior members of the W.H.O. ( not the band)
And anyone with knowledge that could rock the establishment.

Some people are above the law, it ain't right, but it's fact.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
You think that I have a ‘team’ here, I don’t. A crime is a crime and allowing anyone to be immune from prosecution is incredibly dangerous.

Trump for one should have been locked up for what he incited in Washington and for quite deliberately trying to manipulate the votes in Georgia.
Yep me too
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
As far as I can see this doesn't stop Trump being prosecuted, just delays it. If he wins the election however...
 

SIR ERNIE

Well-Known Member
You think that I have a ‘team’ here, I don’t. A crime is a crime and allowing anyone to be immune from prosecution is incredibly dangerous.

Trump for one should have been locked up for what he incited in Washington and for quite deliberately trying to manipulate the votes in Georgia.
Well you've only got to wait a few days.
I'd be amazed if they don't give him a prison sentence on 11 July.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Prince Andrew is bullet proof!
As is/was most of the Royal Family
As was Jimmy Saville.
As was Tony Blair
As is every Prime Minister
And senior Masons
And senior Lawyers
And senior Bankers
Any former member of the IRA
And senior members of the W.H.O. ( not the band)
And anyone with knowledge that could rock the establishment.

Some people are above the law, it ain't right, but it's fact.
I dunno. Did Pete Townshend ever release that book?
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Prince Andrew is bullet proof!
As is/was most of the Royal Family
As was Jimmy Saville.
As was Tony Blair
As is every Prime Minister
And senior Masons
And senior Lawyers
And senior Bankers
Any former member of the IRA
And senior members of the W.H.O. ( not the band)
And anyone with knowledge that could rock the establishment.

Some people are above the law, it ain't right, but it's fact.
OK so let’s stop trying then.
 

rondog1973

Well-Known Member
So they've basically given Trump carte blanche to be a full on dictator if he's re-elected, safe in the knowledge he's immune from any prosecution?

How fantastically stupid this Supreme Court ruling is. Back to feeling smug about us Brits being a cut above intelligence wise I suppose..
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
It's an absolutely staggering verdict, and shows how Trump captured the Supreme Court under his tenure.

The President of the United States is now, in effect, above the law.

That said, notionally this opens the door for Biden to order Trump's assassination; as long as it's an official act he's in the clear.
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
So they've basically given Trump carte blanche to be a full on dictator if he's re-elected, safe in the knowledge he's immune from any prosecution?

How fantastically stupid this Supreme Court ruling is. Back to feeling smug about us Brits being a cut above intelligence wise I suppose..
Yes it is scary. Exactly what he needed to facilitate his stated aim of being dictator. As President he literally could order the execution of any opposition politicians free from prosecution.

Of course this is the danger of having lawyers as political appointments.
 

Como

Well-Known Member
What the Dems seem to fail to realise or perhaps they are just realising is that having opened the Pandora's box this works both ways.

It has been mentioned that this protects Barry, and of course Old Joe. But not Hunter but I can see the old man pardoning him.
 

dutchman

Well-Known Member
So they've basically given Trump carte blanche to be a full on dictator if he's re-elected, safe in the knowledge he's immune from any prosecution?

How fantastically stupid this Supreme Court ruling is. Back to feeling smug about us Brits being a cut above intelligence wise I suppose..
In what way?

Serving ministers in the British government have long had immunity from prosecution.
 

djr8369

Well-Known Member
So they've basically given Trump carte blanche to be a full on dictator if he's re-elected, safe in the knowledge he's immune from any prosecution?

How fantastically stupid this Supreme Court ruling is. Back to feeling smug about us Brits being a cut above intelligence wise I suppose..
Is it stupid or do they know exactly what they are doing?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
What makes the Supreme Court a farce is not just that the President picks new judges for it, but that they always, *always* seem to vote in line with politics. Surely, *surely* there are times when the law guides you away from that, regardless of where you stand politically?!?

So therefore, what does that say about trust in the law anyway, to avoid scenes like last tie out?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top