He changes his stance on everything if he finds he’s questioned on itI thought he had changed his stance in the last year.
Easy accusationHe changes his stance on everything if he finds he’s questioned on it
There must be at the very least discussions happening behind the scenes. God knows why it was left until this stage though, everyone has been able to see there's issues for monthsSeems to be a lot of noise about Biden potentially stepping down...
@SIR ERNIE you going to respond to this?The Democrats are centre-right by UK standards, the Republicans far right. You should be voting Democrat.
Yeah.
And on the other point, I am going to vote Labour, but if I found out Starmer said that same remark about women, as Trump, I wouldn't vote for him and would just go Independent, or Green.
Youre going to vote Labour.
How on earth can you come on here and lecture anybody about politics?
What you talking about?Youre going to vote Labour.
How on earth can you come on here and lecture anybody about politics?
Another nail in the Biden coffin
US supreme court rules Trump has ‘absolute immunity’ for official acts
Court rules former presidents entitled to some degree of immunity from criminal prosecutionwww.theguardian.com
So to clarify, you're happy for Obama to be at risk of imprisonment for his drone strike of two American citizens.Looks like it only took 50 years for Nixon’s ‘If the President does it it’s not illegal’ to come true
If a politician breaks the law they should be held to account, I don't give a shit what party they represent.So to clarify, you're happy for Obama to be at risk of imprisonment for his drone strike of two American citizens.
You think that I have a ‘team’ here, I don’t. A crime is a crime and allowing anyone to be immune from prosecution is incredibly dangerous.So to clarify, you're happy for Obama to be at risk of imprisonment for his drone strike of two American citizens and Biden for his illegal release of violent criminal migrants into America.
Prince Andrew is bullet proof!You think that I have a ‘team’ here, I don’t. A crime is a crime and allowing anyone to be immune from prosecution is incredibly dangerous.
Trump for one should have been locked up for what he incited in Washington and for quite deliberately trying to manipulate the votes in Georgia.
Yep me tooYou think that I have a ‘team’ here, I don’t. A crime is a crime and allowing anyone to be immune from prosecution is incredibly dangerous.
Trump for one should have been locked up for what he incited in Washington and for quite deliberately trying to manipulate the votes in Georgia.
Well you've only got to wait a few days.You think that I have a ‘team’ here, I don’t. A crime is a crime and allowing anyone to be immune from prosecution is incredibly dangerous.
Trump for one should have been locked up for what he incited in Washington and for quite deliberately trying to manipulate the votes in Georgia.
Hope so.Well you've only got to wait a few days.
I'd be amazed if they don't give him a prison sentence on 11 July.
I can't see it, and surely even if they do there are 79 appeals to hear before he'd have to serve it?Well you've only got to wait a few days.
I'd be amazed if they don't give him a prison sentence on 11 July.
I dunno. Did Pete Townshend ever release that book?Prince Andrew is bullet proof!
As is/was most of the Royal Family
As was Jimmy Saville.
As was Tony Blair
As is every Prime Minister
And senior Masons
And senior Lawyers
And senior Bankers
Any former member of the IRA
And senior members of the W.H.O. ( not the band)
And anyone with knowledge that could rock the establishment.
Some people are above the law, it ain't right, but it's fact.
OK so let’s stop trying then.Prince Andrew is bullet proof!
As is/was most of the Royal Family
As was Jimmy Saville.
As was Tony Blair
As is every Prime Minister
And senior Masons
And senior Lawyers
And senior Bankers
Any former member of the IRA
And senior members of the W.H.O. ( not the band)
And anyone with knowledge that could rock the establishment.
Some people are above the law, it ain't right, but it's fact.
Yes it is scary. Exactly what he needed to facilitate his stated aim of being dictator. As President he literally could order the execution of any opposition politicians free from prosecution.So they've basically given Trump carte blanche to be a full on dictator if he's re-elected, safe in the knowledge he's immune from any prosecution?
How fantastically stupid this Supreme Court ruling is. Back to feeling smug about us Brits being a cut above intelligence wise I suppose..
In what way?So they've basically given Trump carte blanche to be a full on dictator if he's re-elected, safe in the knowledge he's immune from any prosecution?
How fantastically stupid this Supreme Court ruling is. Back to feeling smug about us Brits being a cut above intelligence wise I suppose..
Is it stupid or do they know exactly what they are doing?So they've basically given Trump carte blanche to be a full on dictator if he's re-elected, safe in the knowledge he's immune from any prosecution?
How fantastically stupid this Supreme Court ruling is. Back to feeling smug about us Brits being a cut above intelligence wise I suppose..
They’ll be moreOne of the most ridiculous rulings ever.
Be shocked if it is overturned, a federal judge has already ruled he couldn't claim he was acting in his constitutional role as President which is all the Supreme Court ruled he had immunity for.Donald Trump's sentencing in hush money case may be delayed
The ex-president's lawyers cite a new Supreme Court ruling that granted him partial immunity from prosecution.www.bbc.com
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?