Nick
Administrator
They said that and that's that. Nothing. That's what they mean when they go on about public opinion that they can just say what they want.
They said that and that's that. Nothing. That's what they mean when they go on about public opinion that they can just say what they want.Can answer the council one they said it was nothing to do with them
Would urge everyone to do this. You will most likely get fobbed off as I was with them hiding behind a claim of confidentiality but more people doing it at least makes them aware it is an issue that registers with the electorate.Can always raise with your local councillor
If working for a council makes you biased and unfit for a Trust role, then there'd be 17% of this board who wouldn't be suitable.Won't hold your breath. From what I can make out the trust secretary is an ex council CEO and there's another chap who shows as attending board meetings (despite not being listed on their website as a board member) who works for the council.
Joining Hoffman's consortium tomorrow.I couldn't care less at present if Rose West was our chairman
Just done it. Decided not to ask them to take sides, but just urge them to ask why the same deal as last season appears not to be an option, when circumstances are the same.Would urge everyone to do this. You will most likely get fobbed off as I was with them hiding behind a claim of confidentiality but more people doing it at least makes them aware it is an issue that registers with the electorate.
Excellent nw I’m gonna do the same right now. It’s good in my area as I have 2 labour and 1 conservative and the Conservative guy always replies and is really helpful at raising stuffJust done it. Decided not to ask them to take sides, but just urge them to ask why the same deal as last season appears not to be an option, when circumstances are the same.
I also pointed out with city of culture on the horizon, losing a club which has such a heritage and tradition, and ties to the city would be catastrophic.Excellent nw I’m gonna do the same right now
The answer will be because it was actually in last year's deal that if they were still in court they wouldn't renew.Just done it. Decided not to ask them to take sides, but just urge them to ask why the same deal as last season appears not to be an option, when circumstances are the same.
Does no harm, does it. We can either be silent, and the council quite rightly ignores us as they think nobody cares... or we can at least show we do care, and then if the council remain intransigent, they're more culkpable.I will give it another bash on those lines though Northern.
Position has to be as neutral as possible and put CCFC first where possible.
- Why can’t we have the same deal we’ve got for another period?
- Will the Council encourage this with all parties?
- What’s Plan B?
- Will the Council support a search within its boundaries if Plan B is a stadium? Will they facilitate the Butts if that’s it?
Doesn’t pass judgement, doesn’t take sides. Just demands a resolution to CCFC on the same terms or all parties to work together to ensure we are playing locally if not.
So who does then if the Chairman hasn’t?Stop spouting bollocks - fisher has no influence over the club
So if it's not Fisher, who exactly has influence?Stop spouting bollocks - fisher has no influence over the club
Watching the Blaze game last night, on the ice it proudly advertises Cov is the European City of Sport 2019, is this tied into the Culture tag, or a seperate award? Wonder what the cities who missed out will be thinking.I also pointed out with city of culture on the horizon, losing a club which has such a heritage and tradition, and ties to the city would be catastrophic.....
Thing is, Plan B is a very real concern. If they don't have a Plan B (however unpalatable said plan may be - no pun intended) then it'd be a staggering level of incompetence, even for our lot.Both that and what NW are decent, to the point and should be decent starting points.
Change it to a full statement about "What's Plan B Timmy Fishface???" and you are probably bang on with what will be put out.
Yeah I forgot City of Sport. tbf that might have been betterSo if it's not Fisher, who exactly has influence?
Watching the Blaze game last night, on the ice it proudly advertises Cov is the European City of Sport 2019, is this tied into the Culture tag, or a seperate award? Wonder what the cities who missed out will be thinking.
I think the plan B will probably be moving out the city again. I’m sure they’ve spoken to the EFL and would get permission if it came to it.Thing is, Plan B is a very real concern. If they don't have a Plan B (however unpalatable said plan may be - no pun intended) then it'd be a staggering level of incompetence, even for our lot.
To a degree, there's three strands.
Club - What exactly are your plans?
Wasps - What exactly stops you agreeing the same deal this time around?
Council - What will you do to try and facilitate a resolution, and can you accept club remaining in city is the priority?
I should think you're probably right, but we don't know, do we. Now you could argue they learned from last time not to say that too early(!) but Plan B could equally be wind club up and sue. I don't expect the answers to be nice, but it's as well to know!I think the plan B will probably be moving out the city again. I’m sure they’ve spoken to the EFL and would get permission if it came to it.
Yep, if we are to be kicked out we need the council to ensure we get to play at the Butts (Cov rugby permitting and onboard).Position has to be as neutral as possible and put CCFC first where possible.
- Why can’t we have the same deal we’ve got for another period?
- Will the Council encourage this with all parties?
- What’s Plan B?
- Will the Council support a search within its boundaries if Plan B is a stadium? Will they facilitate the Butts if that’s it?
Doesn’t pass judgement, doesn’t take sides. Just demands a resolution to CCFC on the same terms or all parties to work together to ensure we are playing locally if not.
Eh?
Where ?I think the plan B will probably be moving out the city again. I’m sure they’ve spoken to the EFL and would get permission if it came to it.
I care, he amongst many others have been at the heart of our demise.....why should that lying oxygen thief be taking any sort of place at the helm of our club. Fuck him off , he's surplus !Who cares? He’s a periphery figure with zero influence. The fact the trust even mentions the Jimmy Hill Way as an ally shows how deranged they are. The fact they allow their secretary to remain in office shows how unsuitable they are.
An the EFL turns a blind eye and allows this ?
An the EFL turns a blind eye and allows this ?
I get and appreciate the fact that he's not been our finest Chairman (although having led us to our first top six finish in many years and two Wembley appearances... perhaps he is...?) I also have no issue with the general concept that he should sod off (nor, even, as a bargaining tool. I thought him being off would have been the pawn to see us win the Ricoh!) It's also fair to say that certain club statements gloss over certain things.I care, he amongst many others have been at the heart of our demise.....why should that lying oxygen thief be taking any sort of place at the helm of our club. Fuck him off , he's surplus !
As LAST responded to me I take offence at the sly, moronic dig. Rather than ranting foolishly, I'd rather try and see a way forward. My personal agenda is to see the football club succeed (or at least exist!) without cutting off my nose to spite my face.Don't let the facts get in the way of some ones personal agenda !
I would be amazed if there is a contract signed by the club last season that explicitly states we will not be staying at the Ricoh past this season without legal action being dropped. It sounds more like a Wasps soundbite.If it's in the terms and conditions and it's agreed by all then the agreement should be honoured by all.
Where ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?