Was told at the weekend the Ricoh side of the deal, which doesn't concern SISU is done and dusted, exactly what that means I don't know, is it the Higgs Trust, the Council or both ? But SISU still playing hard ball
got my doubts ER (not doubting you were told it and you are relaying it in good faith).... my understanding is that neither the council nor charity will even consider selling their interests in ACL or freehold until they know that the club is viable (plus other criteria)- i don't see how that assurance can be given without owning the club. Not sure the charity or ACL have had detailed talks about any disposal from what i know. Of course the council could sell the freehold but that still means proving viability. NOt saying what you heard is wrong just that i would be surprised if it was accurate right now
It may not seem economically a priority at the moment but to the longterm future and to improve fan affinity it has to be done ,and assuming a takeover by some miracle is achieved ,hold your breath ,i hope they can conclude this aspect.not what ER was told though is it .... was told the deal was done ......... which you might think ACL and charity would be aware of. Proof of funds could only be provided on any purchase of the stadium because they dont know what the deal is for the club. But viability isnt about the purchase price of the club it is the detailed plans going forward
Owning the stadium is not the only way to be viable and buying it creates a liability and an asset in equal proportion on the balance sheet. Owning or having rights to the income streams is the important thing and you dont need to buy the stadium to do that.
I want SISU out but this is also a great opportunity to set our club up properly and that isnt necessarily dependent on buying the stadium or the 50% shares in ACL
No disrespect meant but why is twitter suddenly a source, is it any better than pub talk?
Still no posting of the twitter link....