UEFA EURO 2024 (19 Viewers)

mmttww

Well-Known Member
He can't be that bad - we have now had two finals and a semi final in 4 competitions

Plenty of supposedly good teams fall by the wayside.

Big name managers have constantly struggled to create any team spirit with England - where players egos were massaged and they were more interested in that than being committed to win

This.
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
Imagine saying ‘what about the men’s game’ in the moments of glory for the Lionesses?

A subtext I never like about coverage of the women’s game is the cheap swipes at England’s lack of success from supporters and pundits alike. It’s jarring.
I'm sure you would be met with the same enthusiasm if during the women's euros you constantly shouted "she plays for Man Utd WOMENS", "that's a record in the WOMENS game", "Actually the men did this in 1990" etc.

It's completely hypocritical.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
He can't be that bad - we have now had two finals and a semi final in 4 competitions

Plenty of supposedly good teams fall by the wayside.

Big name managers have constantly struggled to create any team spirit with England - where players egos were massaged and they were more interested in that than being committed to win

Russel Slade took us to the chekatrade trophy final , if we are being pedantic 😉


He should be congranulated on his achievements because on paper they are very good and ultimately that's all that he will be remembered by in 30 years time .

For me , I've rarely enjoyed watching Gareth southgates England .

But as I stated last night I feel that it was his best result as manager of England.

Hopefully we win Sunday
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
It's incredibly hard to talk about Gareth southgate tbh .. very easy to explain what's been so unlikeable about his time as manager but very hard for some to understand it ..
Incredibly frustrating when people compare him to managers who were managing England in a far more difficult international era .. like Comparing pep guardiola at man city to kevin keegan as man city manager and suggesting they had the same circumstances .

As I've stated last night was southgates greatest result at a major tournament .. and for that he should be commended
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Russel Slade took us to the chekatrade trophy final , if we are being pedantic 😉


He should be congranulated on his achievements because on paper they are very good and ultimately that's all that he will be remembered by in 30 years time .

For me , I've rarely enjoyed watching Gareth southgates England .

But as I stated last night I feel that it was his best result as manager of England.

Hopefully we win Sunday

What England teams did you prefer?
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
What England teams did you prefer?

I enjoyed watching England under venables especially in 96 , I enjoyed watching us under Glenn hoddle tbh even if he did lose his job for being a bit of a nut case , but he had us playing good stuff ...and we were a good watch under sven despite some bad fortune in major tournaments but it was an era of great teams
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I enjoyed watching England under venables especially in 96 , I enjoyed watching us under Glenn hoddle tbh even if he did lose his job for being a bit of a nut case and we were a good watch under sven despite some bad fortune in major tournaments but it was an era of great teams

We kept losing
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
We kept losing
Different times not comparible is it .

Sven lost to a great brazil team in 2002 , and a really good Portugal team in 2 other tournaments one of which we were down to 10 men

Hoddle lost to Argentina with 10 men and venables lost a semi final to Germany

And we MUST add that the tournament format is weaker now than back then
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Different times not comparible is it .

Sven lost to a great brazil team in 2002 , and a really good Portugal team in 2 other tournaments one of which we were down to 10 men

Hoddle lost to Argentina with 10 men and venables lost a semi final to Germany

And we MUST add that the tournament format is weaker now than back then

If it’s weaker why are teams like France Germany and Netherlands long gone?

When we last reached a semi final in the World Cup we scraped out of a poor group, played a drab game against Belgium and nearly lost to Cameroon.

In 96 we drew against a low ranked Swiss side and the only real highlight was a group win vs Netherlands

We won against a Spanish side on penalties who has scraped through their group with a late win against Romania

The Czech Republic nearly beat an average German side in the final
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
If it’s weaker why are teams like France Germany and Netherlands long gone?

When we last reached a semi final in the World Cup we scraped out of a poor group, played a drab game against Belgium and nearly lost to Cameroon.

In 96 we drew against a low ranked Swiss side and the only real highlight was a group win vs Netherlands

We won against a Spanish side on penalties who has scraped through their group with a late win against Romania

The Czech Republic nearly beat an average German side in the final


Germany and Holland are not the sides they were , France have been woeful all tournament scoring 1 goal from open play

Tournaments today are by default weaker as they have more teams in them , diluting the quality , this is fact .

Southgate has been blessed with easy runs in every tournament , this is well known and documented .

In 2018 Southgate lost 3 matches in the world cup alone and we finished 4th ..

I have credited him with holland simply by the fact they are 7th in the world
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Germany and Holland are not the sides they were , France have been woeful all tournament scoring 1 goal from open play

Tournaments today are by default weaker as they have more teams in them , diluting the quality , this is fact .

Southgate has been blessed with easy runs in every tournament , this is well known and documented .

In 2018 Southgate lost 3 matches in the world cup alone and we finished 4th ..

I have credited him with holland simply by the fact they are 7th in the world

When there were less teams in the euros powerhouses like Greece and Denmark won them
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
When there were less teams in the euros powerhouses like Greece and Denmark won them

powerhouses like Wigan athletic were when they won the fa cup or Wimbledon or coventry city

And to add to your badly made point about euro 96 .

Germany Spain and Holland were all above England in the world rankings
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I guess the same place that powerhouses Wigan athletic were when they won the fa cup or Wimbledon or coventry city ..

And to add to your badly made point about euro 96 .

Germany Spain and Holland were all above England in the world rankings

France and Belgium are above us in the rankings now. In fact, Croatia are above Spain and Germany.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
France and Belgium are above us in the rankings now. In fact, Croatia are above Spain and Germany.

Right , what's your point ? Belgium are gash , France are pretty poor , Germany still havent got back to being good since 2014 , Spain are playing well for the first time since 2012

The top teams are shite , England should be winning things with this team .. kind of proving what people say tbh

I'm the last 2 years brazil have lost as many games as they've won .. tell me when you've known brazil do that ??
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Right , what's your point ? Belgium are gash , France are pretty poor , Germany still havent got back to being good since 2014 , Spain are playing well for the first time since 2012

The top teams are shite , England should be winning things with this team

According to the rankings we shouldn’t and you keep referring to the rankings
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
According to the rankings we shouldn’t and you keep referring to the rankings
We are ranked number 3 in Europe , 1 and 2 are out so England are the highest ranked team in Europe left in the competition ..

If you think international football is of a higher standard than 20 years ago then you simply don't know anything about football
 
Last edited:

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
People give sven some right shit , but the bloke lost 3 competitive games in 38 competitive matches and has the highest win ratio of all England managers in competitive matches .

He didn't "keep losing"

For the record Southgate lost 3 alone in 2018
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
It's incredibly hard to talk about Gareth southgate tbh .. very easy to explain what's been so unlikeable about his time as manager but very hard for some to understand it ..
Incredibly frustrating when people compare him to managers who were managing England in a far more difficult international era .. like Comparing pep guardiola at man city to kevin keegan as man city manager and suggesting they had the same circumstances .

As I've stated last night was southgates greatest result at a major tournament .. and for that he should be commended

There’s a lot of content on previous managers and the teams they managed. Players from those last teams have admitted that there were cliques and the almost didn’t like each other because of their club rivalries.

We can talk about this factor or the other, one thing everyone can agree on is that England have underachieved as a nation at major tournaments.

Harry Redknapp did a 2004 v 2024 England Euros team head-to-head and only picked Walker > Neville and Kane > Owen. Which is interesting because one of the following statements needs to be true:
1) Our class of 2024 isn’t as good as we believe, OR:
2) Our class of 2004 really was that good but they failed to reached the heights expected

Southgate’s achievements are as followed:
- changing the culture of national team, people report playing for England as a club atmosphere
- winning opening games at major tournaments
- winning KO games against top tier nations like Germany & Netherlands
- getting deep into major tournaments
- investing in the small details around penalty shootouts (learnt from 2021)
- understanding that teams need to grow into tournaments
Irrespective of what happens on Sunday, even the most ‘anti-Southgate’ person ought to agree that he’s laid the foundations to come in and improve. Apparently Lee Carsley is front runner should Southgate stand down.
 

Bugsy

Well-Known Member

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
There’s a lot of content on previous managers and the teams they managed. Players from those last teams have admitted that there were cliques and the almost didn’t like each other because of their club rivalries.

We can talk about this factor or the other, one thing everyone can agree on is that England have underachieved as a nation at major tournaments.

Harry Redknapp did a 2004 v 2024 England Euros team head-to-head and only picked Walker > Neville and Kane > Owen. Which is interesting because one of the following statements needs to be true:
1) Our class of 2024 isn’t as good as we believe, OR:
2) Our class of 2004 really was that good but they failed to reached the heights expected

Southgate’s achievements are as followed:
- changing the culture of national team, people report playing for England as a club atmosphere
- winning opening games at major tournaments
- winning KO games against top tier nations like Germany & Netherlands
- getting deep into major tournaments
- investing in the small details around penalty shootouts (learnt from 2021)
- understanding that teams need to grow into tournaments
Irrespective of what happens on Sunday, even the most ‘anti-Southgate’ person ought to agree that he’s laid the foundations to come in and improve. Apparently Lee Carsley is front runner should Southgate stand down.

If football people keep referring to football teams back them having better players then they probably did have better players ..

And I can't say this again mate , there were so many good international teams compared to today , world football was filled with all time greats

Hence why it was harder for England to win tournaments .

Let's be honest Greece fluked it and were outplayed v france and Portugal but ultimately they won the games

Ps , michael Owen was a superb striker in his prime ,and won Europe's most prestigious honour .
Different player to harry kane , I'd probably pick prime Owen

Harry kane has scored 23 penalty goals for England and Owen scored 1
 
Last edited:

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
They've altered his voice but it's good 👍
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
If it’s weaker why are teams like France Germany and Netherlands long gone?

When we last reached a semi final in the World Cup we scraped out of a poor group, played a drab game against Belgium and nearly lost to Cameroon.

In 96 we drew against a low ranked Swiss side and the only real highlight was a group win vs Netherlands

We won against a Spanish side on penalties who has scraped through their group with a late win against Romania

The Czech Republic nearly beat an average German side in the final
Can look at some of the teams that reached major semi finals in those so called glory years too - Sweden, Bulgaria, South Korea, Turkey... Greece winning the bloody European thing.

The likes of Modric, De Bruyne are up there with the best of the best, it's kind of disrespectful to Croatia's achievements to decide they only did it because the competition was weaker. Only one team can win the thing and it's not like Man City where you can buy players in the positions you need... and Guardiola's tactical decisions in the Champions League final Vs Chelsea were more bizarre than anything Southgate has managed.

At the end of the day it's a knockout tournament so fine margins and luck, but Southgate's record is so consistent it deserves respect.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Can look at some of the teams that reached major semi finals in those so called glory years too - Sweden, Bulgaria, South Korea, Turkey... Greece winning the bloody European thing.

The likes of Modric, De Bruyne are up there with the best of the best, it's kind of disrespectful to Croatia's achievements to decide they only did it because the competition was weaker. Only one team can win the thing and it's not like Man City where you can buy players in the positions you need... and Guardiola's tactical decisions in the Champions League final Vs Chelsea were more bizarre than anything Southgate has managed.

At the end of the day it's a knockout tournament so fine margins and luck, but Southgate's record is so consistent it deserves respect.


I wouldn't class 1994 as being part of footballs golden era the early 90s was arguably a bad period for football in general

The mid to late 90s footballs golden era began for sure
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
If football people keep referring to football teams back them having better players then they probably did have better players ..

And I can't say this again mate , there were so many good international teams compared to today , world football was filled with all time greats

Hence why it was harder for England to win tournaments .

Let's be honest Greece fluked it and were outplayed v france and Portugal but ultimately they won the games

I think there’s a hint of nostalgia clouding your judgement. 1990 and 1996, the tournaments that people older than myself cite, had some average results.

We won 6/31 opening games at major tournaments before Southgate who has won 100% of his opening games.

Let’s be honest, the standard of lower ranked teams has dramatically improved too. Whilst it’s fair to say the Euros has got ‘easier’, the World Cup has arguably got harder to win.

I find it strange that you can’t seem to state the obvious: England have been chronic underachievers.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
I think there’s a hint of nostalgia clouding your judgement. 1990 and 1996, the tournaments that people older than myself cite, had some average results.

We won 6/31 opening games at major tournaments before Southgate who has won 100% of his opening games.

Let’s be honest, the standard of lower ranked teams has dramatically improved too. Whilst it’s fair to say the Euros has got ‘easier’, the World Cup has arguably got harder to win.

I find it strange that you can’t seem to state the obvious: England have been chronic underachievers.

You say weaker teams improved , I say better teams got weaker .. the gap closed that way .

I don't think we've underachieved as a nation we've been through this .. we never really lost to teams that we should have beat in the knockout rounds when I was growing up ..always really tough games against really good teams
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
And nostalgia ? Nothing further from the truth , world football was superb , even club football was better
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
And nostalgia ? Nothing further from the truth , world football was superb , even club football was better
There was also a big difference between those great Italian sides of the past who turned out 1-0s and the teams trying it now. Football is entertainment, or at least it’s supposed to be.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top