D
So some similarities and some differences, which is hardly surprising considering the events are over 80 years apart. He didn't say they were the same.Russia have been for years declaring Ukrainian territory as Russian and when invading the much disputed Crimea I can’t remember a peep from you about that or other attempts to take over Donbass
Hitler had armed himself to the hilt and was preparing for a conquest of Europe - he also operated in an era where certain other nations had dictators with equal dubious intent
We have no formal treaty or legal obligation to Ukraine
NATO didn’t then exist - there was not a huge committed military alliance of nations who are signed up to protect each other
Hitler didn’t have nuclear weapons
The US had zero interest in Hitler - they have most certainly a huge interest in Mr Putin
Putin and his army is weak and has no capacity for a European invasion
China in economic strategic and political terms was non existent then and most certainly isn’t now
I think you are sitting in the 1930’s the only threat to global peace is if we actively defend a non NATO country which would open up a huge can of worms and potential dangers
So some similarities and some differences, which is hardly surprising considering the events are over 80 years apart. He didn't say they were the same.
So on your comments:
Nazi Germany had been declaring parts of Czechoslovakia were German and indeed they contained a majority of ethnic Germans.
We are now also living in an era of very dubious dictators, including in the region of the conflict.
What was the treaty obligation we had to act in relation to Czechoslovakia?
I accept Nato and nuclear weapons points.
Russia have been for years declaring Ukrainian territory as Russian and when invading the much disputed Crimea I can’t remember a peep from you about that or other attempts to take over Donbass
Hitler had armed himself to the hilt and was preparing for a conquest of Europe - he also operated in an era where certain other nations had dictators with equal dubious intent
We have no formal treaty or legal obligation to Ukraine
NATO didn’t then exist - there was not a huge committed military alliance of nations who are signed up to protect each other
Hitler didn’t have nuclear weapons
The US had zero interest in Hitler - they have most certainly a huge interest in Mr Putin
Putin and his army is weak and has no capacity for a European invasion
China in economic strategic and political terms was non existent then and most certainly isn’t now
I think you are sitting in the 1930’s the only threat to global peace is if we actively defend a non NATO country which would open up a huge can of worms and potential dangers
So long story short you are still in the 'let him crack on with it' camp. Could have just said so.
Can you deal with each of my points rather than act like a child?
I don't know how strong Putin's army is relative to Nazi Germany's so didn't comment.none of the others you’ve omitted to reference
I don't know how strong Putin's army is relative to Nazi Germany's so didn't comment.
Accept China point.
But the argument was there were similarities not that they are the same.
What is?Its 1.5 million
Again he just laughs and acts like it's a rebuttal
I did. And you didn't address his list if similaritieswith respect as @fernandopartridge has said the comparison is embarrassing with Nazi germany. I left a long list of evidence and you didn’t address any of it!
I did. And you didn't address his list if similarities
with respect as @fernandopartridge has said the comparison is embarrassing with Nazi germany. I left a long list of evidence and you didn’t address any of it!
Are you his dad? Can’t he answer for himself? I’ll let him answer thanks if you think Putin is going to invade anywhere else I think you are an idiot let’s see what your baby has to say
When you say anywhere else do you mean anywhere else other than Georgia, Moldova and the 2 incursions into Ukraine?Are you his dad? Can’t he answer for himself? I’ll let him answer thanks if you think Putin is going to invade anywhere else I think you are an idiot let’s see what your baby has to say
I have no idea whether he is going to invade anywhere else. In my view only an idiot thinks they know.Are you his dad? Can’t he answer for himself? I’ll let him answer thanks if you think Putin is going to invade anywhere else I think you are an idiot let’s see what your baby has to say
Its 1.5 million
Good grief. Is the head of the army also an embarrassment for having called it a '1937 moment'? I mean your take of 'let Putin crack on with it' is the most embarrassing anyone has made on this topic.
And you haven't addressed the comments I made on your list.with respect as @fernandopartridge has said the comparison is embarrassing with Nazi germany. I left a long list of evidence and you didn’t address any of it!
so you haven’t said that Putin will if allowed a share of Ukraine look to invade elsewhere? You haven’t said that? Your comparison is stupid and ignorant - you seem to think he’s going to invade us. He won’t just relax
But according to Grendel, unlike in the 1930s there are no other dictators in the area.Small matter of Belarus too which essentially is a vichy government to Russia with some 30000 Russian troops based there.
I namechecked Moldova and Georgia. Both have pro-Russian separatist regions, in Georgia's case already on the Russian border and in Moldova's case also on the border if Ukraine falls. Neither are NATO members either.
You said the old soviet states
USSR invades Ukraine.
that’s even more worrying Really? So a man chooses to invade a country from 3 sides with nearly all he’s got and there are no similarities to a certain someone doing it in ‘39? I guess the Ukrainian journalist who asked Boris the other day was taking the piss too.www.skybluestalk.co.uk
Which does not necessarily have to be by conquest e.g. the puppet he has in Belarus
So he can make Poland a puppet state - how?
It’s a little like an abortion discussion I was having on a Christian group with a right wing extremist nut job
All grendel is saying is that this stops with negotiation why not try it
All bsb and herts are saying is there are similarities with nazi germany and to be fair so is the head of the British army, he is probably saying that as he’s eyeing up an increase in funding and more recruits but he’s still said it
Both are correct is my point
Just to be clear I have never said there shouldn't be negotiation. I was just supporting BSB's comment. One doesn't negate the other.It’s a little like an abortion discussion I was having on a Christian group with a right wing extremist nut job
All grendel is saying is that this stops with negotiation why not try it
All bsb and herts are saying is there are similarities with nazi germany and to be fair so is the head of the British army, he is probably saying that as he’s eyeing up an increase in funding and more recruits but he’s still said it
Both are correct is my point
It will end with talking though. I agree with your summary of what happened with crimea. It’s such a shame that we can’t treat Russia like any other bully and crush them and him with overwhelming forcePretty much. The main difference is I don't see a negotiation with a concession of territory being the end. After all Crimea was tacitly given up by the West and the invasion still came 8 years later, likely only delayed by Covid
Let's see how he gets on conquering Ukraine first. Again, at the same time you said 'let Putin crack on with it'.
You're always avoiding comment on that one-do you agree that would have been an error?
I never said it so how can I comment on it?
I’ve lived in a period where Russia has control of half of Europe and we avoided a nuclear holocaust. Russia now is never going to do this again. Ever. It’s straining at the neck to get Ukraine.
It’s going to take all his efforts and financial resources to keep hold of Ukraine and have a devastating effect over time in its country
I wouldn’t antiginise China so isolate him and let him get on with it in terms of military intervention
His original 'let him get on with it' comment was before then
In simplistic terms let them get on with it and the sanction should be that Ukraine will always be denied NATO access
Fair enough it was 'get' rather than 'crack' in this case
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?