There is no good type of Nazi, as the Conservative Party Conference is aptly demonstrating. You can’t link everyone’s opinion and standards in the UK with theirs. Same as you can’t Ukrainians with one group of people in Ukraine. I don’t even believe that all Russians are aligned with Putin, I suspect and hope that there’s a silent majority just too scared to put their heads up. Just the same as I witnessed with my own eyes the sight of a united Ukraine preparing for a fight at the start of Russias invasion (part 2) I also witnessed Russians attempting to protest the invasion. Protests viciously put down by the madman you think Ukraine can have a genuine negotiation with. You haven’t even got to look at Russia’s behaviour against Ukraine to see that Putin isn’t a man you can negotiate with, just look at the way Russia treats Russia.Nazi Symbols on Ukraine’s Front Lines Highlight Thorny Issues of History (Published 2023)
Troops’ use of patches bearing Nazi emblems risks fueling Russian propaganda and spreading imagery that the West has spent a half-century trying to eliminate.www.nytimes.com
No doubt the ‘good’ type of nazi.
Of course not all Russians are not aligned with Putin! There will be as much variation in opinion as there is here on our Government. But in a totalitarian regime you have to be careful what you say and in Russia of course any dissent on the war in Ukraine is illegal will most likely land you in jail.There is no good type of Nazi, as the Conservative Party Conference is aptly demonstrating. You can’t link everyone’s opinion and standards in the UK with theirs. Same as you can’t Ukrainians with one group of people in Ukraine. I don’t even believe that all Russians are aligned with Putin, I suspect and hope that there’s a silent majority just too scared to put their heads up. Just the same as I witnessed with my own eyes the sight of a united Ukraine preparing for a fight at the start of Russias invasion (part 2) I also witnessed Russians attempting to protest the invasion. Protests viciously put down by the madman you think Ukraine can have a genuine negotiation with. You haven’t even got to look at Russia’s behaviour against Ukraine to see that Putin isn’t a man you can negotiate with, just look at the way Russia treats Russia.
Well the country supplies them with military hardware and invites their leader over for a state visit. I haven’t seen you outraged about that and/or stuff in Yemen.I wasn’t and as you didn’t mention Saudi Arabia in your reply to my post I don’t know what else you were expecting me to think.
Although I suspect that our opinions on Saudi Arabia and should we be supplying them with military support are probably identical. I’m a solid no.
However you can’t compare the support of Ukraine with the support we give to Saudi Arabia. Giving concessions to Russia would be more inline with giving support to SA.
You haven’t been paying enough attention then because whenever Saudi Arabia comes up in conversation on this forum, any thread, I’ve always consistently expressed the same opinion. We shouldn’t be supplying them arms.Well the country supplies them with military hardware and invites their leader over for a state visit. I haven’t seen you outraged about that and/or stuff in Yemen.
I understand they are pretty proficient at cutting the hands off any arms.You haven’t been paying enough attention then because whenever Saudi Arabia comes up in conversation on this forum, any thread, I’ve always consistently expressed the same opinion. We shouldn’t be supplying them arms.
This thread is full of such takes to be honest. People thinly veiled wanting Russia to prevail and assuming those who oppose Ukraine ceding territory to be ‘cowboys’ wanting war for war’s sake.Ukraine has bad guys too so we shouldn't send them aid is such a shit take.
This thread is full of such takes to be honest. People thinly veiled wanting Russia to prevail and assuming those who oppose Ukraine ceding territory to be ‘cowboys’ wanting war for war’s sake.
Now even got some here repeating Lavrov and Putin’s ‘we need to get rid of the Nazis’ excuse.
TBF I don't think anybody here wants Russia to prevail mate, people are just highlighting it's not as straight forward as backing one of two boxers in a ring. Lots of history and politics going on in the background, above my head to be honest, but I'm not blind to the fact that the longer it goes on support will eventually dry up.This thread is full of such takes to be honest. People thinly veiled wanting Russia to prevail and assuming those who oppose Ukraine ceding territory to be ‘cowboys’ wanting war for war’s sake.
Now even got some here repeating Lavrov and Putin’s ‘we need to get rid of the Nazis’ excuse.
I can think of one or two posters in particular who have no issue with a Russian victory.TBF I don't think anybody here wants Russia to prevail mate, people are just highlighting it's not as straight forward as backing one of two boxers in a ring. Lots of history and politics going on in the background, above my head to be honest, but I'm not blind to the fact that the longer it goes on support will eventually dry up.
Ahh yes the New York Times, the infamous mouth piece of Putin.Indeed. I think a few have swallowed the Russian disinformation campaign without even realising.
Lavrov was asked to explain how a country with a Jewish president was also swarming with Nazis. He couldn’t, but it hasn’t stopped people on here trying to solve that problem for him.The idea that a clearly fascist state, Russia, is invading a neighbouring democracy to rid it of other fascists, is for the birds.
That said, there's no doubt that Ukraine has issues with the far-right too, as do a number of Eastern European countries, like Serbia. We're not exactly perfect either, and nor is the US.
It might be an endless battle for democracies this, squashing racism and fascism within, but it in no way justifies what Russia is doing in Ukraine. Surely this is obvious?
Ahh yes the New York Times, the infamous mouth piece of Putin.
Agree with most of that but not sure about the first part.TBF I don't think anybody here wants Russia to prevail mate, people are just highlighting it's not as straight forward as backing one of two boxers in a ring. Lots of history and politics going on in the background, above my head to be honest, but I'm not blind to the fact that the longer it goes on support will eventually dry up.
I’m sorry but that’s bollocks.I can think of one or two posters in particular who have no issue with a Russian victory.
people are just highlighting it's not as straight forward as backing one of two boxers in a ring.
I’m sorry but that’s bollocks.
It isn’t. I mean one has tried to argue that Russia were provoked into invading and multiple others think Ukraine should hand over territory to get some temporary peace.I’m sorry but that’s bollocks.
It isn’t. I mean one has tried to argue that Russia were provoked into invading and multiple others think Ukraine should hand over territory to get some temporary peace.
The opinions in this thread are bizarre to say the least
I don't know why you get so triggered by the provoke element - several US commentators have openly admitted this as a strategy
So on the one hand peace must be sought immediately because the country is being destroyed and hundreds and thousands of Ukrainians are being killed, yet on the other hand this is exactly what they wanted?
Yet another bizarre contradiction.
Do you have a link to these US commentators saying this?
It’s not triggering just evidence of a pro Russian stanceI don't know why you get so triggered by the provoke element - several US commentators have openly admitted this as a strategy
What are you babbling on about?
Its you that have put the US into the good guy camp not me
I'm saying you're contradicting yourself, again, and I'm asking for a link to these US commentators saying Russia was provoked.
Ahh. The old Ukraine isn’t allowed the sovereignty to democratically move closer to one of its neighbours in case it upsets a mentalist in Russia argument.
It’s always especially ironic when its brexiteers who trot out that excuse. Why is one company allowed the sovereignty to move away from its neighbours and another isn’t?
You seem unbelievably inept on Ukrainian history so I’ll give you the short version. In 2014 a Russian stooge Yanukovych refused to sign the Ukraine-EU association agreement that he had been voted in on the understanding that he would sign which had been over a decade in the making and pursued through the ballot box. The people of Ukraine used their sovereign right to vote to have closer ties to the EU and move away from Russia. You either believe in their right to democracy or you don’t, you clearly don’t.Who has said they aren’t allowed their sovereignty- the irony is most of the far right chums in the uk who voted for brexit agree with you Tony - didn’t you vote Corbyn last time?
You seem unbelievably inept on Ukrainian history so I’ll give you the short version. In 2014 a Russian stooge Yanukovych refused to sign the Ukraine-EU association agreement that he had been voted in on the understanding that he would sign which had been over a decade in the making and pursued through the ballot box. The people of Ukraine used their sovereign right to vote to have closer ties to the EU and move away from Russia. You either believe in their right to democracy or you don’t, you clearly don’t.
The rest of your post is just nonsense not least because I never suggested that a majority of brexit voters either did or didn’t support Ukraine. I merely pointed out the extra irony of Brexit voters such as yourself denying Ukraine their own freedom to choose their own destination in case it upsets Putin.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?