Alan Dugdales Moustache
Well-Known Member
And he's also very good at telling people he isn't going to do stuff, but then does . Like having parties.
And he's also very good at telling people he isn't going to do stuff, but then does . Like having parties.I think a distinction needs to be made between words and actions. Boris is very good at telling people he's going to do stuff, then not doing it. They deliberately held back when the sanctions are going to be introduced, almost certainly to allow the individuals involved to get their money and assets out.
If true that’s a world war starting
So basically he has a real problem with telling the truth.And he's also very good at telling people he isn't going to do stuff, but then does . Like having parties.
You're banging on a lot over a word that has no meaning . You used it to have a go at another member on here, and yet you don't know what it means. The definition you posted has no meaning .
Well it's a bit like sayingIf true that’s a world war starting
Spot on !. Nuance or not we're all on the same side on this thread. Well, most are !Erm, technically, I think you started it by banging on about someone using a real actual word that is in the dictionary.
Anyway mate, apologies, I was a bit rude before which was uncalled for, but honestly 'nuance' does have a meaning. If it was literally meaningless then no one would use it, like say, qargke.
I get you don't like it, but it is a real word, honest!
Anyway, if you don't stop I'm going all in with 'paradigm shift' and 'tactically naive', though, ok?
Can we call a ceasefire on it and agree terms later, perhaps. In the meantime, a favourite gif...
Erm, technically, I think you started it by banging on about someone using a real actual word that is in the dictionary.
Anyway mate, apologies, I was a bit rude before which was uncalled for, but honestly 'nuance' does have a meaning. If it was literally meaningless then no one would use it, like say, qargke.
I get you don't like it, but it is a real word, honest!
Anyway, if you don't stop I'm going all in with 'paradigm shift' and 'tactically naive', though, ok?
Can we call a ceasefire on it and agree terms later, perhaps. In the meantime, a favourite gif...
Spot on !. Nuance or not we're all on the same side on this thread. Well, most are !
Putin said the conflict will only stop if Ukraine stops fighting and Russia’s demands are met. In a phone conversation with the Turkish president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Putin also said Ukraine’s negotiators should take a more “constructive” approach in talks with Moscow to take into account the reality on the ground.
I'm not sure Putin knows what a negotiation is...
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
A Russian ceasefire, or an actual ceasefire?
Only a nonce would say nuance.My inner child is trying to make me insert the word 'nuance' into every posting from now on. Must resist.
You bastard.Only a nonce would say nuance.
That started when Putin got his tanks rolling
No it definitely did not this would be a nato breach
Poland has MIG’s which the Ukrainian pilots already know how to fly. Sounds like the US came to an arrangement with Poland to supply some of their MIG’s to Ukraine. Assume the yanks are going to replace them with US equipment and training for Polish pirates.
Poland has MIG’s which the Ukrainian pilots already know how to fly. Sounds like the US came to an arrangement with Poland to supply some of their MIG’s to Ukraine. Assume the yanks are going to replace them with US equipment and training for Polish pirates.
View attachment 24078
Been suggested already that Putin has been planning to let off a dirty bomb and blame Ukraine.
That's not a Polish pirate. Way too many vowels.
It's a Ukrainian parrot thoughThat's not a Polish pirate. Way too many vowels.
War started he means and he’s right none of this shit moving of the blameNo it definitely did not this would be a nato breach
Bloody suggestive testing changing just as I select the word.
Starmer a Marxist?well here’s not much of a nuance for you and it’s not subtle - would you trust a Marxist like Starmer who was anti nato now pro nato and was opposed to every single war including Afghanistan
Keir Starmer’s cynical embrace of Nato is a sad sight indeed | Ukraine | The Guardian
The Labour leader accused us of backing Putin by opposing war in Ukraine. He knows he’s wrong, says Lindsey German, convenor of the Stop the War coalitionamp.theguardian.com
I see. So he can invade wherever he wants and only when someone gets in the way is it a problem
Well we invaded where we wanted and nato itself does when it feels the urge - I wouldn’t personally want by live changed by defending Ukraine military
Well a main voice against our own illegal invasions is a man you’d never vote for. Still you seem very content to let Putin take over wherever he likes
Well you are contradictory do you want military action or not
I don’t
The Polish planes are similar to the ones Ukraine use. The Polish will receive US planes as a replacement.Yes, it would be Ukrainian pilots flying through Polish planes.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
You want Putin to take what he wants with minimal obstruction
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?