Nick
Administrator
It is "stop the blame game", "we need to stop looking at the past" when it shows the council have also been up to no good. Haven't seen the Trust say that about the Conn article while they are pushing it, strangely.
It’s definitely this. People went on about morals during the Northampton fiasco, dropped them when London Wasps rocked up and so it became a completely anti-sisu stance. Now evidence emerges that corroborates the stance that more than one party is to blame they don’t have a leg to stand on so lash out in increasingly desperate ways.
Clueless.
Another apologistThink congratulations are due to Rondog. On a board with numerous batshit crazy posts he’s managed to outdo everyone.
Did you go Friday? Did you hear the chants? Who do you think is ignorant of the facts now?
Some still ignore them but that’s by choice, not ignorance.
You're constantly at pains to point out to people that they need to be dealing in fact. Deal with fact then. Forget sentiment, just fact. We don't own the stadium. If we want a piece of it, we're gonna have to pay.Feel free to correct me, what am I actually clueless about?
You are the one saying we should buy into half of Wasps debt to be able to play locally.
You are better off hiding behind your faux outrage.
They would get a better stadium naming rights deal which CFC wouldn’t benefit from though, sadly.Us returning to the PL would be their worst nightmare, it suits them for us to be in the lower leagues. Also the extra money that it would bring it would mean that we could actually afford to build our own stadium and take away vital income from them.
For who? I’ve been accused of being both a council employee and SISU apologist in the past, am I adding Nick apologist to the list?Another apologist
They would get a better stadium naming rights deal which CFC wouldn’t benefit from though, sadly.
Is Gypo a racist or ethnic derogatory term? Yes or no?For who? I’ve been accused of being both a council employee and SISU apologist in the past, am I adding Nick apologist to the list?
Are there any others available, want to make sure I get the complete collection :emoji_joy:
The reason wasps were the preferred buyers if the ricoh was that they were willing to take on the associated debt and SISU werent.
SISU are now whinging in court that wasps didnt pay enough for the ricoh.
Another point, do you think SISU would be willing to sell on ccfc without it's associated debt? Not on your nelly.
Not true. Sisu agreed to take on the YB loan to pair the arena with the club. The council took that lon on instead and then sold it on to London Wasps begins our back.The reason wasps were the preferred buyers if the ricoh was that they were willing to take on the associated debt and SISU werent.
SISU are now whinging in court that wasps didnt pay enough for the ricoh.
Another point, do you think SISU would be willing to sell on ccfc without it's associated debt? Not on your nelly.
You're constantly at pains to point out to people that they need to be dealing in fact. Deal with fact then. Forget sentiment, just fact. We don't own the stadium. If we want a piece of it, we're gonna have to pay.
To want the club to move out of the city to avoid doing this shows how deluded you are I'm afraid.
So according to you what will we have to pay Wasps to enable us to play in Coventry as well as taking on half of their debt?
It's fact you fool! They own it, face facts!
I'm afraid the delusion and desperation isn't on me in this case.
I notice the narrative has moved on from dropping the legals to paying London Wasps a large sum of cash.
Look, deal with the fact that they own the stadium. If the price we have to pay is half their debt then so be it. Sisu's last JR contention was that it was sold undervalued so does that debt purchase fall below or above their own valuation?And take on half their debt whilst doing it.
And it will move on again when we fail to agree a Ricoh rent deal and it emerges Wasps are trying to charge 3 times the previous rate. Then it will be Wasps right to charge what they like as owners and back to SISU's fault for not buying it when they had the chance.I notice the narrative has moved on from dropping the legals to paying London Wasps a large sum of cash.
Look, deal with the fact that they own the stadium. If the price we have to pay is half their debt then so be it. Sisu's last JR contention was that it was sold undervalued so does that debt purchase fall below or above their own valuation?
Deal with the fact that unless we bail them out they won't own it for very long.Look, deal with the fact that they own the stadium. If the price we have to pay is half their debt then so be it. Sisu's last JR contention was that it was sold undervalued so does that debt purchase fall below or above their own valuation?
Because the owners dictate some of the terms of the sale I suppose.Yes, the fact they own the stadium.
What I am questioning is why we would need to buy half and take on half the debt to play there?
Deal with the fact that today is Monday. That is unrelated to the point discussed too.
Because the owners dictate some of the terms of the sale I suppose.
I don’t support the wasps!What about the hedge fund that you support that hold to ransom and are trying to bleed money from a local asset? Do you think about that when waving your free flag?
The irony is dripping from your post. Slightly embarrassed you can't even see it but it just sums things up.
I don’t support the wasps!
I am a season ticket holder at the sky blues
I like rugby
I like football more
I hate what Sisu have tried to do through buying our club
To be fair to the whole of the city the council have had to be firm
No irony ,no embarrassment, just got my opinions . I thought you wanted to hear them Nick . It’s your forum.
Ha ha! Okay, a different angle. How have Wasps incurred the debt?What are you on about? Your replies aren't matching up to the posts you are replying to.
Like I said, stick to the false outrage. I can see why that was your approach after seeing you try to make a point.
Ha ha! Okay, a different angle. How have Wasps incurred the debt?
I don’t support the wasps!
I am a season ticket holder at the sky blues
I like rugby
I like football more
I hate what Sisu have tried to do through buying our club
To be fair to the whole of the city the council have had to be firm
No irony ,no embarrassment, just got my opinions . I thought you wanted to hear them Nick . It’s your forum.
I asked you.You tell me. Then you can tell me the relevance of what your point is now trying to be.
LaughableIt's getting very desperate
I asked you.
If the debt is related to the stadium purchase, then its related to what we'd have to pay to buy into it.The bond raised £35m to pay off a loan of about £14m didn't it?
Imagine your outrage if SISU financed against the Ricoh to give themselves £10m.
Still, you now want the football club to give them a chunk of money and take on half the debt to be able to play in Coventry.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?