Whilst I can't argue that Mowbray is at least partly responsible, I can't say I'd like him to get the sack. The first half of this season was the most exciting for years, and of the 30 years I've been going, I've never felt so optimistic. Chipfat is right, the problems run deeper than Mowbray. Getting rid of him would just be wallpapering over more cracks.
It wasn't the selling of Maddison, it was the timing of that sale. Had we sold him and immediately bought two or three and banked the bulk of the fee we would properly of accepted that situation, has happened for years, Maddison was always on the moveTrue. Mowbray is the best manager we have had for years and because of a bumpy ride which he did predict earlier in the season it is no reasonto sack him. I know we are fed up talking about the owners but they are the problem. We have constantly had owners who make us into a selling club. Selling Clarke and Wilson was the ruin of Pressley and this year the selling of Maddison change the whole bonding of fans with players. It happens every year. Until we have owners who say NO WE WON'T SELL and put some ambitious plan into action we will continue to be where we are.
Regarding Mowbray, I've gone from hopeful optimism to guarded pessimism. I'm not sure he has what it takes to get us out of this division but I'm not quite ready to call for his exit. Only 3 teams out of 24 can get promoted and 6 out of 24 reach the play-offs, so the vast majority of clubs will have no success each season. And you can't blame Mowbray for the decades of failure before he joined us. I'd give him until the end of his contract.
Grendel is obviously researching and giving careful consideration to answering my questions? Considering he seems to have made his mind up on Mowbray for several weeks now, I thought the high flying executive might have had the answers to hand?
Bring in Steve Cotterill. He's done it before in this league.
Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
No I just logged off and went out for tea.
Are you still out?
Clearly not. I am going out in 20 minutes though - is that ok with you?
He had £5 million to spend though and double the budget of everybody else the year Bristol got promoted.
A point that will be missed by many. Burton money to spend, Wigan money to spend, Walsall no money to spend but took Dean Smith the best part of five seasons to get that team firing. Posters on here want Bristol/Burton type of quick results but with a Walsall type of budget. Living in a dream world.
We need long term planning as you suggest. Sacking TM and his team would be madness, absolute madness
who earned £40k. Jfh or nc or ???
I know Eakin said Burton had money to spend but he didn't mean budget relativity to us. He meant given their relative low income.
The manager earned £40,000 a year.
You say long term planning but what happens if this form carries on into next season?
What does Anderson do if crowds slump to 8,000? Tony seems to suggest giving Mowbray more time.
The strange thing is few on here give positive reasons to retain him it seems to be one of the following;
We sack managers all the time so let's not sack this one
We need to think of a replacement that can do better first. Pretty ridiculous when you look who was odds on to be the first premier league manager to be sacked in August - no one can tell
We can't afford to lay him off
Well if we end up bottom of he league in October and we are missing our crowd targets by 25% what then?
You say long term planning but what happens if this form carries on into next season?
What does Anderson do if crowds slump to 8,000? Tony seems to suggest giving Mowbray more time.
My point is you can put the best manager in the world in charge and they can only work within the budgets and recruit accordingly. I appreciate our income is totally linked to gate receipts,as you suggest , but our owners are not going to "speculate to accumulate" so we are where we are.
surely the best managers would be able to get the best out of the budget and the players they have?My point is you can put the best manager in the world in charge and they can only work within the budgets and recruit accordingly. I appreciate our income is totally linked to gate receipts,as you suggest , but our owners are not going to "speculate to accumulate" so we are where we are.
Some managers do work on limited budgets and I don't think ours is that limited compared to others.
Some managers do work on limited budgets and I don't think ours is that limited compared to others.
surely the best managers would be able to get the best out of the budget and the players they have?
Raneiri has a smaller budget than man city, Chelsea etc.Like who for instance?
Raneiri has a smaller budget than man city, Chelsea etc.
He's getting the best out of them.
It's alright everybody moaning about investment, but it's not football manager with the cheats on. A good manager would get the best out of what he has, rather than using the investment excuse when nearly every other team in the league is in the same boat.
I meant at this level as that would at least be relevant.
If every other team in this league is in the same boat why are you surprised that over the whole of the season we're no better or no worse than every other team in the league.
Yes, given the timesurely the best managers would be able to get the best out of the budget and the players they have?
That's what clubs employ managers to do - achieve better than the opposition around them.
Since the start of December we have being doing a lot worse than virtually all other teams - including those with paper thin squads and small crowds.
TM to stay for me as I beleive the management infrastructure behind TM Venue & Clapham etc..need time to deliver. Since strachan was sacked we've had so many managers some deserved the sack some didn't but I think we need stability. I'm hoping they have plans in place in the close season to use the Madder's money wisely , its a hope coan't afford to sack TM as the budget is so small and there would be costs to pay off his team which will affect the budget.
TM won't be sacked.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?