I haven't said they have done anything wrong, I am pretty sure they would have been well informed about any legal ongoings.
It may also explain the rush to get the council loan paid off.
100%.
However I think we are all reading way too much into this part of the claim. Relatively speaking it is pennies. If the loan had been agreed at 14m @ 5%, but the correct commercial rate turns out to be 7.5% then they will have 2.5% bill for the period of time the loan was in existence. I am not trying to belittle half a mil, but just saying that the Wasps liability ends with this payment and that is why they wanted rid of the CCC loan asap as there is no further liability. I would go so far as to say it is quite damning how quickly they have offloaded the loan with bonds paying 6%...
However to demand this repayment is a necessary part for Sisu to show wrong has been done and then as a consequence they can sue the council for damages which is clearly their real target here. Suing the council was mentioned for the first time during this court meeting - the cat is out of the bag.
Now this is a big "IF", but we all know that Sisu are not blameless here, but as my parents always told me, two wrongs don't make a right, so IF the council have retaliated incorrectly against Sisu then they deserve what is coming their way regardless of feelings about Sisu.
What I don't know is if damages awarded would be to CCFC or Sisu as the injured owner of a company that has lost value due to 3rd party - any thoughts OSB?
Specs