Wasps downward spiral... (5 Viewers)

Gynnsthetonic

Well-Known Member
They keep mentioning selling the stadium for a knock down £28m, who though will pay that for it, its back to where we were before, its worthless!
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
All the statements are still available on various investor sites, perhaps they have removed it and from the offal so that lazy Wasps fans don’t stumble across it on their website by accident.
 

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
I think the question a lot of bondholders should be asking is; when are they going to get their investment back, and not just the interest on their investment?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Months ago they were releasing statements saying similar, what makes anyone owned money think things will be different this tie round? Reads to me as more stalling and hoping the bond holders will just sit on their hands and do nothing while not getting their money back on some vague promise better times lie ahead.
 

Gynnsthetonic

Well-Known Member
Months ago they were releasing statements saying similar, what makes anyone owned money think things will be different this tie round? Reads to me as more stalling and hoping the bond holders will just sit on their hands and do nothing while not getting their money back on some vague promise better times lie ahead.
I'd imagine they've come out with this statement because they know the bondholders are gathering force and want to halt their proceedings against Wasp to cash in on the bond at a reduced rate meaning bye bye Wasp
 

jordan210

Well-Known Member
I thought they where all ready at advance stages with HSBC about 6 months ago.....

I bet the 6.5% they have to pay bond holders is a damn site cheaper than what they have been offered elsewhere to cover the bond
 

Gynnsthetonic

Well-Known Member
I thought they where all ready at advance stages with HSBC about 6 months ago.....

I bet the 6.5% they have to pay bond holders is a damn site cheaper than what they have been offered elsewhere to cover the bond
All in place ready to go according to Shugs 🤣
 

CCFC54321

Well-Known Member
Despite what that Dawkins chappie is saying on Twitter he hasn’t or didn’t have anything new to unveil. The statement is re worded from the last and significantly doesn’t say any time frame for repayment.

It’s a reworded holding statement that’s meaningless in all entirely.
 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
I bet the 6.5% they have to pay bond holders is a damn site cheaper than what they have been offered elsewhere to cover the bond

Definitely. They were probably looking at realistic rates of 9-13% at the start of this year. Now probably getting to 15% with Base Rate and LIBOR changes.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
given they have had years with essentially an interest only loan, and even to meet the payments on that they had to borrow enough to ring fence money for the interest payments, how on bath are they going to service a loan at a higher interest rate moving forward?

I don't see any business plan that is going to give them that kind of turn around, it will need millions a year and they need to generate millions more a year just to break even.

Am I missing something as their supporters seem to be in celebratory mode but is this not just delaying the inevitable?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
given they have had years with essentially an interest only loan, and even to meet the payments on that they had to borrow enough to ring fence money for the interest payments, how on bath are they going to service a loan at a higher interest rate moving forward?

I don't see any business plan that is going to give them that kind of turn around, it will need millions a year and they need to generate millions more a year just to break even.

Am I missing something as their supporters seem to be in celebratory mode but is this not just delaying the inevitable?

If they are really looking to borrow and have any chance of achieving it you’d assume it’s over much longer - 25 or even 40 years with the head lease signed over if it defaults
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
40 years at 12% would be £4 million a year
 

CCFC54321

Well-Known Member
given they have had years with essentially an interest only loan, and even to meet the payments on that they had to borrow enough to ring fence money for the interest payments, how on bath are they going to service a loan at a higher interest rate moving forward?

I don't see any business plan that is going to give them that kind of turn around, it will need millions a year and they need to generate millions more a year just to break even.

Am I missing something as their supporters seem to be in celebratory mode but is this not just delaying the inevitable?
Reading the wasps bond site they don’t believe wasps and think there in worse position as they have no timeline of payment at all.

Nothing to see here as the situation is still the same prior to the ‘statement’. It’s like going to one of those loan sharks at unpayable interest rate.

It’ll catch up eventually even if they do refinance the loan.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top