dandigirl
17 Oct '20 - 13:07 - 135 of 137 |
0 0 0 |
Hi. Thanks. Your points are well made and for the most part are two-edged.
First up: Totally agree that WASPS [and all the PL clubs] are in a weak position. IMV because of this any finance will not be low cost, as you suggest. Who would provide it? On what terms? Certainly not any regular financiers - hedge funds? maybe, but whoever does will be an opportunist and drive a very hard bargain. Any finance will not come cheap and in any event there isn't the cash flow to service it. WASPS is not bankable.
In a simple world, and I think we agree it isn't, DR could arrange for a new bond on terms such as these he is proposing and repay current bondholders. He knows it will not fly.
That is why he is trying to foist these onerous terms on current holders. It doesn't matter if the current bondholders force his hand now or the new Johnies-come-lately do so sometime next year. WASPS is still bankrupt whoever does it.
WASPS problems are not going away with these proposals. They make matters worse.
Please ignore the valuation. What you have is historic. It no longer applies. Value is what someone will pay today.
If DR has sources of finance which require these changes, let him come clean now and tell us what is intended.
Why should CCFC or anybody enter into any sort of arrangement with a weak organisation which may not be around in a few months time. Better to wait a bit longer and see what transpires. Might come cheaper if the WASPS hive has collapsed.
In my terms DR is a wealthy man. When it comes to baling out WASPS, he isn't. The last figure I saw for his net worth was in the high £30 millions. That was pre-Covid so who knows, now he may be worth less, maybe more. But as before, why should he risk his wealth on this. I am sure Mrs DR would have something to say!
Yes, I am resigned to losing part of what we have invested.
Finally, if DR or someone has a few million to spare, he could arrange to repay bondholders 20% on the condition that the other 80% is extended on different terms to be agreed. This is what IPF is proposing with their Eurobond due next year. DR would do well to look at this sort of idea.
Finally, as part of this process DR ought to lay out the current state of the Group's finances - and what is intended, in details.
Enough, I think.