Wasps going into admin & the impact on CCFC (67 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
I'm guessing there is a HMRC internal guidance notes on taking this on.

It won't be the first time.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
We understand this lasted around 20 minutes and people were told the club was in advanced talks and things will move fast with the next step - with the overall tone being a 'hopeful' one. But there is a waiting game to be played.

There was a feeling relayed that HMRC's issuing of a winding-up order came as a surprise.
If I was a member of staff I wouldn't find that particularly reassuring given that we've seen months of statements about this all being sorted imminently.
 

Senior Vick from Alicante

Well-Known Member
It is possible to get an extension to the 10 days if evidence shows funds are immediately forthcoming after the

Have HMRC actually petitioned? If not why would WASPs publicise it? This is an active decision not wholly linked to HMRC

Do you think that they have taken the 10 day option as they new that HMRC had had enough and they are trying to negotiate extra funding to cover the amount owed to them as well as the bond holders? Just a thought.
 

Nick

Administrator
You would think if they had solid evidence that they will be able to pay HMRC in 10 days then they wouldn't put in a winding up order.
 

jordan210

Well-Known Member
You would think if they had solid evidence that they will be able to pay HMRC in 10 days then they wouldn't put in a winding up order.

I did spot something about Rugby had extended a TV boardcast deal today. basicly like ifollow. Wonder if the plan was to use any money to pay the minimum to keep HMRC of their backs
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
I did spot something about Rugby had extended a TV boardcast deal today. basicly like ifollow. Wonder if the plan was to use any money to pay the minimum to keep HMRC of their backs
Is that the PTI thing? If so that's just extending an existing deal, don't think it will bring much, if any, extra revenue. They were pushing for a new TV deal that included a dedicated rugby channel but couldn't get any interest and I think as a last resort they had to go back to BT and extend their existing deal on the same terms as they were in danger of ending up with no deal at all.
 

RegTheDonk

Well-Known Member
.
Is that the PTI thing? If so that's just extending an existing deal, don't think it will bring much, if any, extra revenue. They were pushing for a new TV deal that included a dedicated rugby channel but couldn't get any interest and I think as a last resort they had to go back to BT and extend their existing deal on the same terms as they were in danger of ending up with no deal at all.
Kind of like Sky Sports Football but it would have been BT Rugby?

Doubt that would work but I do see an iFollow model would be of benefit, particularly for London based fans who won't want to travel, assuming they let UK people watch it legally. Might be the only way to actually get people to watch them, can't keep giving away tickets.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
You would think if they had solid evidence that they will be able to pay HMRC in 10 days then they wouldn't put in a winding up order.

Depends on the amount owed - I’ve heard from admittedly a not always reliable source it’s rather a lot
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

Grendel

Well-Known Member
But that may not be true it’s just a rumour
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member

Nick

Administrator
Do HMRC allow you to negotiate some pennies for a pound or will any new owner have to pay it in full?
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
You would think if they had solid evidence that they will be able to pay HMRC in 10 days then they wouldn't put in a winding up order.

They might be able to get one more moratorium down at the end of the initial ten days which would extend for another 10 days. Depends on what’s happening and if a solution is possible

Do HMRC allow you to negotiate some pennies for a pound or will any new owner have to pay it in full?

If it goes into administration it’s the administrators job to try to get the most for the assets, creditors will then get what they get. This is unless the administrator wants to exit administration via CVA (which means entity/company survives) in which case the creditors would either be repaid in full (unlikely) or receive a pence in the pound proposal they then accept or reject. Not sure why they’d bother with a CVA unless there was something in the rugby rules which means it’s required. Don’t know if this is the case or not
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Sounds like to buy Wasps clearing debt to HMRC, bondholders and Richardson (£18m) would cost £65m plus.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Sounds like to buy Wasps clearing debt to HMRC, bondholders and Richardson (£18m) would cost £65m plus.

I think so
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
Rugby League world cup in October. Some Matches are at the CBS. Here we go again.
Who is responsible for the pitch as things stand ?
 

oldfiver

Well-Known Member
They might be able to get one more moratorium down at the end of the initial ten days which would extend for another 10 days. Depends on what’s happening and if a solution is possible



If it goes into administration it’s the administrators job to try to get the most for the assets, creditors will then get what they get. This is unless the administrator wants to exit administration via CVA (which means entity/company survives) in which case the creditors would either be repaid in full (unlikely) or receive a pence in the pound proposal they then accept or reject. Not sure why they’d bother with a CVA unless there was something in the rugby rules which means it’s required. Don’t know if this is the case or not

One advantage of a CVA is it does not require a report on the Directors and their performance as does a liquidation
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
One advantage of a CVA is it does not require a report on the Directors and their performance as does a liquidation

Agreed. If it goes into administration first the administrators will have to do a conduct report though. Looks like administration is the likely process unless a solvent deal is secured, how they exit is the unknown
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top