Nuskyblue
Well-Known Member
Thanks.
Seeing as they come with a stadium I can't see anyone going north of 30m for us.
Thanks.Reported at 42m
Sunderland - £42m stadium included.Reported at 42m
What the fuck is filibustered?
Who knows what debt attached and if they have playing staff worth a black cat.Sunderland - £42m stadium included.
Which madman would pay £60m for an Indebted CCFC with no stadium ?
I agree, he’s a good account analyst.Imho, Oldskyblue58 is the antithesis of a filibusterer.
It's refreshing to have someone on this forum who speaks without bias and can explain things in layman's terms.
It's not about what she wants anymore if she wants out. Sisu are in a hole with limited options. Everyone knows that.
Anyone looking at buying the club will purchase the following not the shares.
The right to play golden share
The playing squad
The training ground on a current use basis not development basis.
The trademark
The website rights
Fixtures fittings and equipment.
There isn't much else. There is no stadium and whatever is left on the current lease or licence hasnt got a huge value and could even be circumvented in any case.
I do not see 60m in that list to be honest
Any buyer simply won't be interested in her investment losses. No buyer needs to look at how much she has " put in"
Sisu will use the losses across the portfolio. A very big chunk of which they have manufactured by clever use of group accounts in any case.
If she wants to sell, I doubt it will cover the losses in the group accounts. Certainly no one needs to purchase sbs&l
A buyer doesn't even need to buy otium or pay off the approx 20 m or so of loans in that company. In deed why would anyone buy a company withthe huge liabilities that sisu have built up( loans & pref shares)
Joy should have sold last season
I remember the old owner saying that he'd take 37m for it, as for debt, I'm sure there was >15m. I think they did something devious with parachute payments... something that got the maccems riled at any rateWho knows what debt attached and if they have playing staff worth a black cat.
Plus, I thought there was an offer of £42m turned down. Not sure of actual sale. Link anyone?
I guess those loses show up as debtors on SISUs accounts and so effectively an asset? Would that be why they’d manufacture “losses” and hang around, it inflates their balance sheet? Or have I got that all wrong…It's not about what she wants anymore if she wants out. Sisu are in a hole with limited options. Everyone knows that.
Anyone looking at buying the club will purchase the following not the shares.
The right to play golden share
The playing squad
The training ground on a current use basis not development basis.
The trademark
The website rights
Fixtures fittings and equipment.
There isn't much else. There is no stadium and whatever is left on the current lease or licence hasnt got a huge value and could even be circumvented in any case.
I do not see 60m in that list to be honest
Any buyer simply won't be interested in her investment losses. No buyer needs to look at how much she has " put in"
Sisu will use the losses across the portfolio. A very big chunk of which they have manufactured by clever use of group accounts in any case.
If she wants to sell, I doubt it will cover the losses in the group accounts. Certainly no one needs to purchase sbs&l
A buyer doesn't even need to buy otium or pay off the approx 20 m or so of loans in that company. In deed why would anyone buy a company withthe huge liabilities that sisu have built up( loans & pref shares)
Joy should have sold last season
I thought that at the start of the summer but was there any credible buyers ?! As soon as the stadium looked like it might be up for grabs I’m surprised more didnt move
What’s wrong with us ?!
I don't care what her top and bottom figure is if she does indeed want out. It's not the important figure is it.
Personally I wouldn't pay more than 30m tops for the assets listed. But I would never buy a football club in the first place.
Maybe it was a mistake to return to the Ricoh a 2nd time. We are like the abused partner that won't walk away, just keep coming back.
Sisu had plenty of time to look for somewhere to move us to. Were their plans ever genuine..!?
Yes there was some messing with parachute payments.I remember the old owner saying that he'd take 37m for it, as for debt, I'm sure there was >15m. I think they did something devious with parachute payments... something that got the maccems riled at any rate
Me if I win the £150million on the Euro lottery tomorrow.Sunderland - £42m stadium included.
Which madman would pay £60m for an Indebted CCFC with no stadium ?
I guess those loses show up as debtors on SISUs accounts and so effectively an asset? Would that be why they’d manufacture “losses” and hang around, it inflates their balance sheet? Or have I got that all wrong…
Of course it is an important figure. If no one is willing to pay what she wants for the business, it won't get sold. No matter how obscure her valuation may be.
Will you be going to Wasps games in championship out of interest? How about if there is a re-birth in London?
He said “if she wants out” - so the top end valuation is irrelevant as it’s a figure no one will pay
He isn't going to shag you...
Correct.Of course it is an important figure. If no one is willing to pay what she wants for the business, it won't get sold. No matter how obscure her valuation may be.
Will you be going to Wasps games in championship out of interest? How about if there is a re-birth in London?
Correct.
And regardless of the “value” that others may claim it’s whether SISU can afford to crystallise their debt at a loss or not. They will no longer be able to say that they have investments in fund A or B of £“X”m for CCFC if they’ve sold for 20. They’ll have to show a loss.
I’ve read a lot of twaddle on here from people I thought understood real world business better.
And also Grendel who I knew didn’t to start with.
I find it interesting - the strategy and risks involved between SISU / Wasps and now MA.
It’s like a game of Poker, Wasps have gone all in and lost, SISU have all their chips in the middle and MA has just come to the table with a great big bag of big chips.
Correct.
And regardless of the “value” that others may claim it’s whether SISU can afford to crystallise their debt at a loss or not. They will no longer be able to say that they have investments in fund A or B of £“X”m for CCFC if they’ve sold for 20. They’ll have to show a loss.
I’ve read a lot of twaddle on here from people I thought understood real world business better.
And also Grendel who I knew didn’t to start with.
I find it interesting - the strategy and risks involved between SISU / Wasps and now MA.
It’s like a game of Poker, Wasps have gone all in and lost, SISU have all their chips in the middle and MA has just come to the table with a great big bag of big chips.
I don’t agree.No, as said before this is a straight up choice.
Continue either subbing the club money or extracting insignificant amounts for decades more, or try to seal a big one off payment to also be shot of an entity they never really wanted and where any avenue to getting the ground on the cheap is permanently closed off.
My concern is they decide to cash in on all the players worth anything in January then go for a sale half a season before relegation.
I don’t agree.
They are a hedge fund.
Definition:
A hedge fund is a limited partnership of private investors whose money is managed by professional fund managers who use a wide range of strategies, including leveraging or trading of non-traditional assets, to earn above-average investment returns.
——
So long as SISU shows its investors that the value of their investment increases then that’s all dandy.
The various “funds” show that the money in CCFC is earning £2m per year in interest. On paper. That’s the key. On paper.
It looks to me that on paper SISU have CCFC at £60m.
Sell for less and they have a problem.
Put the full post up.Lets put your financial acumen into context
Two days ago you stated that Ccfc paid its staff between £3 and £4 million a year
Yes you claim to have an accounting background and you actually put in writing championship Coventry City with championship players we’re paying all staff (not just players) a grand total of £3 to £4 million a year
Put the full post up.
….It was something like “quick google of “CCFC wage costs” was “—-whatever——”. Others have said 17m. Doesn’t matter, the point is….
That’s the whole point.They can't extract £2m a year if the club is already losing money before that money comes out. As I said, they actually had to put in £4.5 million this year for that very reason.
If somebody offered them a way out for a respectable 8 figure sum they ought to take it.
It was the first two results and not the key point, unlike saying Sunderland was sold for £42m because that was the first Google article.Yeah and you didn't question what was obviously years and years out of date.
That’s the whole point.
They can’t.
And it’s not SISU putting their money in, it’s using investor funds and then increasing the investor debt and showing increased “profits (interest)” which is then added to the “investment”
It’s not quite a PONZI. In the same way Sir Allen Stanford’s business model wasn’t.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?