Wasps going into admin & the impact on CCFC (144 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

WestEndAgro

Well-Known Member
My excellent reply from Roger Bailey

Dear Steve

Thanks for your email. I am deeply concerned about the situation at the CBS Arena and the impact it may have on Coventry City FC. As such, our group has written to the Leader of the Council this morning with a series of questions about the actions they intend to take to support the football club.

Secondly, I am aware of rumours circulating on social media regarding an urgent meeting this evening. As you suggested, we understand this to be a private meeting of the Labour Group and not a formal council meeting. We will of course look closely at any proposals that come out of that meeting.

It’s worth me pointing out that we have 15 Conservative councillors, to Labour’s 36. We can't stop them from doing anything, but we can, and do, provide an alternative and hold them to account. The rest is down to the electorate. Rest assured that we will be holding them to account for any decision they take.

Kind regards
Roger Bailey


All e-mails are monitored by Coventry City Council's ICT Security, using Mimecast in accordance with the Regulations of Investigatory Powers Act 2000.


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are requested to contact the sender.
All e-mails are monitored by Coventry City Council's ICT Security, using Mimecast.
The views contained in this e-mail are those of the author and not necessarily those of Coventry City Council.
Show more
 

AndreasB

Well-Known Member
I agree. And it’s quite clear that Simon wasn’t the problem at the time, but it was in fact his employer the Cov Tel. But we all know that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That’s true but his book (which was free of editorial control) pedalled the same myths.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

tisza

Well-Known Member
"It's a disgrace to take our P share away, what happened to the rugby family"

You voted to make the Premiership a closed shop. What happened to the rugby family then?

Hypocrites the lot of them. They just want to be treated special because they think they're big time.
It's embarrassing.
Funny when you're on the inside and safe, not so funny when you're one of those outside trying to get back in.
Rugby family, football family all good when it comes to charity things and anything that doesn't cost them money or threaten their income.
Otherwise it's a cut-throat business. Look out for number one. Actions rarely match the (free) words of sympathy.
 

CCFC54321

Well-Known Member
We all knows they will get a life line from someware.
I doubt the kit man has any information on what the suits are up to. He’s a bit of a character by what I’ve heard but I doubt he would be in a position to know any information reg bail outs etc.

If he did and I was his employer I’d be pulling him over the coals twittering hints of going on behind the scenes.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
"It's a disgrace to take our P share away, what happened to the rugby family"

You voted to make the Premiership a closed shop. What happened to the rugby family then?

Hypocrites the lot of them. They just want to be treated special because they think they're big time.

I always thought the rugby lot were embarrassingly out of touch gimps anyway from experience. But they really are another level.

“Hello rugby person, what is your favourite sandwich?”

“I DON’T LIKE FOOTBALL”

Always talking about football, even when I’ve not mentioned football and have given no hint of being into football. And for the record I wouldn’t be talking about rugby now if all this nonsense wasn’t going on.
 

Senior Vick from Alicante

Well-Known Member
I always thought the rugby lot were embarrassingly out of touch gimps anyway from experience. But they really are another level.

By tbe looks of it ffom what i can pick out the P share is the sticking point in the negotiations. The share entitles you to income but you loose it if you enter administration. Potential buyers won't commit unless Wasps retain the P share but will only buy them from administration as it gets rid of the bond issue?
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
By tbe looks of it ffom what i can pick out the P share is the sticking point in the negotiations. The share entitles you to income but you loose it if you enter administration. Potential buyers won't commit unless Wasps retain the P share but will only buy them from administration as it gets rid of the bond issue?
And that’s the premierships issue - they’re saying that it would be unfair for them to clear their debts then retain the share.

they’ll all start doing it
 

tisza

Well-Known Member
So wasps fans still as of today have the cheek to call Saracens cheats and then in the next breath want the “rugby family” to save them
Been recruiting players whilst knowing they had a huge debt to pay - that they didn't know if they could pay. Cheating Vs dishonesty.
Breaking a salary cap Vs potentially defaulting on huge debt.
As bad as each other
 

Happy_Martian

Well-Known Member
So Mondays meeting then is Labour only then a full council meeting on Tuesday

That seems to be correct based on the tweets today. But then we have another question to ask ... if they were already planning to meet as a party on Monday, why was an emergency meeting called for tonight ? And if there are no plans to financially support Wasps (with or without a U-turn), why the sudden cancellation after the media and the public started responding to it ?

I know I've been wary about adding to conspiracy theories before but these new facts just are not adding up. I can foresee something happening in the next week that we may not like.
 

rexo87

Well-Known Member
That seems to be correct based on the tweets today. But then we have another question to ask ... if they were already planning to meet as a party on Monday, why was an emergency meeting called for tonight ? And if there are no plans to financially support Wasps (with or without a U-turn), why the sudden cancellation after the media and the public started responding to it ?

I know I've been wary about adding to conspiracy theories before but these new facts just are not adding up. I can foresee something happening in the next week that we may not like.
I agree. Feel very uneasy about the whole situation. But then why would CCFC agree to a joint statement with the council this evening if Council are in discussions with Wasps about a bail out. Just doesn't add up

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Has someone hacked his account? If only someone had pointed out they were being told a pack of lies constantly.

The best one I've seen in the last couple of days is they couldn't ground share with Brentford as the Met wouldn't allow them to move back to London. Personally I have my doubts that the number of police needed for a Wasps game would cause policing in London collapse.

Which is ironic as they were invited to ground share with Brentfors at the new stadium back when it was being planned. They turned the offer down to come to Coventry.
 

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
I always thought the rugby lot were embarrassingly out of touch gimps anyway from experience. But they really are another level.

“Hello rugby person, what is your favourite sandwich?”

“I DON’T LIKE FOOTBALL”

Always talking about football, even when I’ve not mentioned football and have given no hint of being into football. And for the record I wouldn’t be talking about rugby now if all this nonsense wasn’t going on.

Yep. My rugby loving father-in-law will take any opportunity he can to slag off football for no reason.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
"It's a disgrace to take our P share away, what happened to the rugby family"

You voted to make the Premiership a closed shop. What happened to the rugby family then?

Hypocrites the lot of them. They just want to be treated special because they think they're big time.

Remember when -laughably- Bolton wanted to stop relegation when they were in the Premier League?
 

Fergusons_Beard

Well-Known Member
It’s also worth remembering the hundreds of thousands of pounds paid by the council to that PR firm to push the WASPS move through and discredit the football club.

If I remember rightly they even tried to infiltrate this place at one point and they were very active on the socials shouting down any body with an ounce of sense!

Now THAT was a colossal waste of tax payers money!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 

hutch1972

Well-Known Member
That seems to be correct based on the tweets today. But then we have another question to ask ... if they were already planning to meet as a party on Monday, why was an emergency meeting called for tonight ? And if there are no plans to financially support Wasps (with or without a U-turn), why the sudden cancellation after the media and the public started responding to it ?

I know I've been wary about adding to conspiracy theories before but these new facts just are not adding up. I can foresee something happening in the next week that we may not like.
After Monday they will be in admin and relegated, so they better get their skates on.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
There was a group meeting of the labour cllrs tonight to discuss the situation

There was never going to be a vote on bailing wasps out

Legohead has added 2 and 2 together and got 5
 

Calista

Well-Known Member
I hope people aren't over-interpreting the statement of cooperation between CCC and CCFC. Very welcome and refreshing, but to me it just looks like a common sense practical approach to ensure that matches can go ahead in the immediate future. I don't read anything into it about the wider issue of stadium ownership, which would require massive softening of attitudes on both sides.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
I hope people aren't over-interpreting the statement of cooperation between CCC and CCFC. Very welcome and refreshing, but to me it just looks like a common sense practical approach to ensure that matches can go ahead in the immediate future. I don't read anything into it about the wider issue of stadium ownership, which would require massive softening of attitudes on both sides.
Common sense would be a massive improvement over what we've seen in the past.
 

Frostie

Well-Known Member
Been recruiting players whilst knowing they had a huge debt to pay - that they didn't know if they could pay. Cheating Vs dishonesty.
Breaking a salary cap Vs potentially defaulting on huge debt.
As bad as each other

They have literally zero self awareness.

They have breached the salary cap themselves in the not so distant past too & have actually taken players from Saracens by offering more money than Saracens could pay.

Funnily enough they were one of the biggest dissenting voices about reducing the cap too yet somehow blame that as well.

20221014_212032.jpg

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top