Yes but who is actually behind the deal?
All will be made clear very soon.
anyway We will soon have a new ground so who cares.
shame we couldn't play with the commitment of a rugby team today.
A bloke called Robinson(now where have I heard that name before :thinking aboutYes but who is actually behind the deal?
All will be made clear very soon.
anyway We will soon have a new ground so who cares.
shame we couldn't play with the commitment of a rugby team today.
Wasps merge with Cov, buy into ACL and purchase the football club......a result?
Sorry but my question was about the football club only. I have absolutely no interest in rugby.No, because Wasps have been dragged away to oblivion, and a higher league place has been bought by a Coventry club rather than earned.
Sorry but my question was about the football club only. I have absolutely no interest in rugby.
Which of course does not apply to our current owners:facepalm:The answer is still no for the reasons I have given.
You'd also be encouraging the purchase of the football club by an entity willing to move a sporting team wherever they felt like.
Which of course does not apply to our current owners:facepalm:
absoplutely????? Too much to drink this evening?
Not any more; gave up that profession many years ago. Your little black book needs refreshing.You're a hot shot lawyer, you must be able to work out the point I'm making.
Thought that sisu were being made to pick up the legal tab
Plus the Higgs charity will put aside a set amount per annum to be used for charitable causes, it's unlikely they would have lowered that because of the court case, they'd more likely used reserves.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
What are you up to these days? Astrophysicist?
He's migrated from a barrister to a barista .
From a legal leader to a beagle breeder.
Wasps merge with Cov, buy into ACL and purchase the football club......a result?
Whereas you two (if there is in fact two of you) have gone from cunning stunts to stupid cun......
Well you get the picture.
You beat me to it sbt
For the JR, not the Higgs case. The judge didn't rule in favour of either party in the Higgs case so both party was declared by the judge to be liable for their own cost. You may well have forgotten but a certain someone also tried to spin that into how wonderful JS was for not claiming costs against Higgs despite the judge saying not five minutes before that she couldn't.
I don't know the inns and outs of Higgs finances like you seem to but I have trouble believing that if they do carry a reserve that it's there on the off chance that they get into a legal wrangling with a Cayman Islands based hedge fund. I would imagine it's there for a more constructive purpose.
Remind me of who took who to court in this scenario?
(And the counter claim out of order would never have been out forward had the original claim not been made)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Whereas you two (if there is in fact two of you) have gone from cunning stunts to stupid cun......
Well you get the picture.
Am I allowed to use that same logic to demonstrate how SISU cost the club 20 points? After all SISU called the administrator in for a debt they owed themselves and cost us 10 points and the only reason ACL could reject the CVA was because SISU called the administrator in in the first place. So using your own logic ACL never ever cost us a single point whereas SISU clearly cost us the whole 20. I assume you agree whole heartedly.
Am I allowed to use that same logic to demonstrate how SISU cost the club 20 points? After all SISU called the administrator in for a debt they owed themselves and cost us 10 points and the only reason ACL could reject the CVA was because SISU called the administrator in in the first place. So using your own logic ACL never ever cost us a single point whereas SISU clearly cost us the whole 20. I assume you agree whole heartedly.
You can do if you want. Who was it who applied to put us in administration first and would have done the deed 24 hrs later had sisu not reacted and got in first?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
You can do if you want. Who was it who applied to put us in administration first and would have done the deed 24 hrs later had sisu not reacted and got in first?
http://www.coventrycity-mad.co.uk/n...y_administration_statement_787428/index.shtml
But this is just going round and round in circles.
The fact is sisu didn't force Higgs to the crown court like you suggested (I am not sticking up for sisu, it's the taking money of poor children angle). They didn't pay the £29k because they didn't feel they were to blame for talks stopping, Higgs wanted the £29k, the judge determined that all parties lost appetite for a deal therefore sisu were not liable for the £29k.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
That worked out well for us didn't it. All hail SISU the CCFC saviours. Saved us from a fate worse than administration by putting us in administration and we come out the other side with no debt what so ever. Wait that last bits not right. Still it was definitely easier than paying Higgs £ 5.5m for half of ACL after all it's worthless and nobody else would ever be interested in a stake of ACL. Ooops, I seem to have gone off topic at the end there. Wait that last bits not right either. SISU's master plan, pure genius.
No not really, it's turned out shit, it would have still probably still turned out shit had ACL chosen the administrator....
...oh well at least we're not tied in to a contract with another 42 years at £1.3m per annum.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Remind me of who took who to court in this scenario?
(And the counter claim out of order would never have been out forward had the original claim not been made)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?