Nick
Administrator
Yes but they have done it so that it isn't wasps fault now.... Not much different to when they were trying to take on the higgs site.
Wasps pull out... (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Tommo72
- Start date
Warwickhunt
Well-Known Member
Got my Hammer and Chizel ready for a trip to the RICOH tonight to get me brick back.
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
And lob them through the windows
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
London Wasps never intended to do a deal did they
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
So to sum up:
Wasps say legal action must be stopped
Legal action stops
Two year deal agreed
Wasps change the requirements to 'all proceedings surrounding acquisition and ownership of the Ricoh'
Absolute c**ts. That has never been the requirement.
Interestingly Reid is reporting that the EC is investigating which suggests to me they aren't dismissing it out of hand and feel there is something that requires investigation. Again I'm not comfortable with blackmail being used to avoid scrutiny of the actions of public bodies using taxpayers money.
Gilbert has been played like a fiddle and in his desperation to get some sort of 'exclusive' and get one over on Reid he hasn't stopped to think why he's being fed certain information or the damage making it public could do.
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
I think there are people involved in this carry on who expect us to be at the Ricoh next year under new ownership.
They're playing Russian roulette with the club's future to stroke their own fucking egos.
As for sisu, they should have been transparent regarding this complaint, if indeed they weren't.
I don't believe anything anyone says.
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
Looks that way. This is now the third occasion they've given the appearance of being willing to do a deal only to pull out at the last minute.
Sky Blue Harry H
Well-Known Member
Rightly or wrongly, I am moving towards this position. If Wasps/Council have done nothing wrong, then why should they be worried about anything the EU might have a look at. It should be an irrelevance. It would be more damning if a 'ground deal' agreement could prevent an investigation into an activity (whether it proved to be legal or illegal). The timing/excuse for pulling out stinks.
Sky Blue Harry H
Well-Known Member
This !!!!
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
I'm probably the least violent person you could ever wish to meet but you can only push people so far. At this point I would have no issue with anyone taking things into their own hands be that disrupting matches, taking back bricks etc.
They've had enough warnings and have chosen to ignore them.
Warwickhunt
Well-Known Member
Only if the European Commission after investigating that it is deemed State Aid rules have been broken
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
Odd that Gilbert doesn't just run with the story like he does when the other side feed him information.
JulianDarbyFTW
Well-Known Member
So Simon Gilbert has effectively made us homeless. Probably so he can write another 'bestseller' off the back of it.
SkyBlue_Bear83
Well-Known Member
Smells like bullshit, the whole Ricoh talks was a pr move to stop protests at the end of the football season it seems.
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
Exactly, they had no intention of doing a deal. First hint was the club mentioning hurdles days after people were saying a deal was agreed.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
Everyone who has a brick should take it back. Also do they still have those seats for kide
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
If there was evidence to back up that claim there's no way Gilbert would run it he's talking shit
Whatever anyone thinks Gilbert is there's one thing he definitely isn't and that's a Cov supporter.
WillenhallSkyBlues
Well-Known Member
London wasps never had any intention on ever doing a deal did they. This has been the perfect excuse for them. It’s not any form of legal action that their claiming it to be.
Nick
Administrator
Yep, expect Hoffman to be about again
JulianDarbyFTW
Well-Known Member
Fuck it, I say agree the groundshare now. Screw Wasps and screw the council. Their stance changes more often than I change my underpants (insert 'twice weekly' joke here).
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
Well tomorrow is Thursday...
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
What exactly do London Wasps want though? If you take their excuse at face value they don't want any investigation into the Ricoh to be ongoing. Sisu cannot stop the EC from doing its work. They will only do a deal if we could go back in time and stop things that are already in motion? It's such an obvious excuse to cover their own backs and I can't believe people have fallen for it.
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
If it comes off then fair enough because sisu are quite clearly ready to mire the club in another long winded dispute and I'm pissed off with it but I think they're putting the club's existence in jeopardy.
Razzle Dazzle Dean Gordon
Well-Known Member
Well that's us groundsharing it would seem. My assumption is that Wasps see this as tantamount to 'legals' because a possible outcome of any investigation is that they'd have to repay any aid received.
They're all a bunch of twats.
They're all a bunch of twats.
Sky Blue Harry H
Well-Known Member
Really feel we should be doing something creative/legal to become a boil on the backside of W*sps / Council if this continues.
There probably is one - I vaguely remember Grendel starting one? - but we need a suggested 'action' thread. I know there will be differing groups/opinions, but we ought to be able to come up with some nuggets, aside from the crude 'slap a Wasp' ideas!
Even suggestions of actions at Wasps games would increase their security costs (as an example)
Bombarding the council with letters to read/answer would tie them up.
We can make their lives a misery if so we choose. i have time on my hands, just over half a brain, and am fairly creative - I'm up for it (but it has to stay legal, otherwise you alienate public support)
There probably is one - I vaguely remember Grendel starting one? - but we need a suggested 'action' thread. I know there will be differing groups/opinions, but we ought to be able to come up with some nuggets, aside from the crude 'slap a Wasp' ideas!
Even suggestions of actions at Wasps games would increase their security costs (as an example)
Bombarding the council with letters to read/answer would tie them up.
We can make their lives a misery if so we choose. i have time on my hands, just over half a brain, and am fairly creative - I'm up for it (but it has to stay legal, otherwise you alienate public support)
SkyBlueCRJ
Well-Known Member
Something tells me the club might leave the pen emoji out when they issue the groundshare announcement
Nick
Administrator
Have said that for months. If the club goes tits up then a new club can play there, it's no skin off their nose.
Strange nobody is asking more questions about things like that.
The Lurker
Well-Known Member
what I don’t get is, why did Ccfc issue a statement saying talks on going when we all know that’s bollox. i don’t trust any of them. Wasps, sisu, council. only people suffering are us
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
See this is the quandary I'm in
On one hand I agree, on the other I don't want to support sisu taking us out of the city because they could end all this and concentrate on sorting the club out.
I didn't realise it was possible to hate both sides in a dispute so much. Jeopardizing our clubs future while they carry out their pissing contest. And as for that shower of utter cunts at the council and the lackey Gilbert, there are no words.