dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
Plenty more freebies flying about today
I put up an article about the sales on here the other day. I think the attendance had dropped by at least 11k
The post has been removed.
Last edited:
Plenty more freebies flying about today
I put up an article about the sakes on here the other day. I think the attendance had dropped by at least 11k
The post has been removed.
I put up an article about the sakes on here the other day. I think the attendance had dropped by at least 11k
The post has been removed.
You mean this one?
http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threa...ected-for-Wasps-home-game-against-Sale-Sharks
Probably moved as you were trying to post your rubbish on the football section again
Doesn't start a conspiracy if you don't make out its been removed though, as if it is North Korea...
To be honest I was a bit surprised to see it go as it wasn't a post projecting Wasps in a good the light. The article talks about a bumper crowd. My adjoining comment was about the fall in the crowd.
Not sure what happened to it if it hasn't been removed. Are you the only one who can delete posts Nick?
Some of them on twitter are hilarious, switching between angry at sisu and supporting wasps.The bandwagon jumpers make my blood boil.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Is it not the one ccfc just posted?
Sorry just clicked that link. I thought CCFC had put the link for the actual article.
Did that go as a whole separate thread when I posted it?
I am sure it was on this Wasps thread under our chat about what the purpose if this thread was for
No, I moved it into a thread of it's own in the Wasps section..
Do you mean the one that was moved into your thread within a couple of minutes and as soon as it was seen?
It's ok though, blatantly a conspiracy...
I am asking why my post about the upcoming Wasps match and the drop in attendance was removed from this thread to elsewhere by you. Yet here on this thread are lots of posts including some by you about the attendance.
There was a report done about 15 yrs ago on sporting event revenues and football had the lowest per spectator. Horse racing (excluding betting) was the highest and Rugby was also very high.
Im guessing at Gloucester the spend per fan is very high.
People talk about the amount of money from the new TV deal but we all know how that works. Money floods in at the top and all of a sudden the players are asking for silly money to sign or renew contracts. I'm not sure you can say the TV money is going up X so the clubs will be better off by the same amount. Chances are most if not all of it will go straight back out. Or, if they follow footballs example, they'll overpay the players and ending up spending more than they have.
the report was on spectator spending, ticket and betting wasn't included. It was merchandise, hospitality and F&B
Think the cap remains and the authorities have allowed a 10% bump
Think they're also allowed to give two players salaries above the cap
I'm sure creative accounting and agents can find a way round these things. Player sponsorship, image rights etc. Can't be that hard to find a way to get cash to a player without it being part of their salary and impacting on the cap.