A typically mature response from someone who seems far more interested in the council than the club and no doubt was less interested in Southampton Harry shaw the inland revenue etc
Am sure Fisher and Sisu would be shouting about it if it was true - all i heard fisher moan about yesterday was not having seen the accounts for the pies.
Hmmm deloittes - they used to sign off the accounts for a company called Welcome Finance - it later turned out that there was a £750 million black hole in Welcomes accounts - the CEO and most Welcomes directors had to go - some have been banned and fined.
With accountancey skills like that you can see why SISU would like them involved
ACL has 5 board members - 2 are employed by the council, as the council owns half of ACL that makes sense - the other 3 are not from the council - can you provide evidence please that they are "ex Cov Council" ?
ACL has 5 board members - 2 are employed by the council, as the council owns half of ACL that makes sense - the other 3 are not from the council - can you provide evidence please that they are "ex Cov Council" ?
Have just spoken to Tim Fisher and he has told me that this number was one that was proposed by Daniel Gidney many months ago and has formed no part of the current negotiations. It was a number that obviously was dismissed out of hand by the club and has never been mentioned again by either party so it is really a red herring.
Clarified?