Yes but thats 6 pages later, if he felt he wasn't making his point clear why not edit the opening post?
Yes but thats 6 pages later, if he felt he wasn't making his point clear why not edit the opening post?
I'm amazed this needs to be spelledl out but very well.
This is clearly a deliberate ploy to deflect and create unrest.
Next stage will be a fans forum. The demand will be a bigger stadium in a more suitable environment. They will have by then secured some land in prinicipal.
As a result of the fans fury they will have to revise their plans. So then its off to the football
League asking for an extension to over 5 years as the fans need to be listened to.
So the trust, kcic fans forums agree and agree in needs building as quickly as possible.
Then see what happens....
Because he likes to point out he is a considerably better person than you. Don't worry he is better than all of us.
No objections. Just accept the design, accept the capacity and accept its location outside the city.
Be very positive and tell sisu to go for it with 100% fans backing.
OK, I get it. The presumption is that if we go along with it there are less excuses for SISU to use when it doesn't happen.
I kind of see it, but I think there are a couple of problems.
The first is that SISU clearly don't give a toss about what the fan's think. So it's a bit rich of them to suggest to the FL (for example) that they were going to build a 12,000 seater stadium outside Coventry, but the fans didn't like it - so can we have a bit longer please. I'd never underestimate the spinelessness of the FL, but surely even they could see through that.
I think the other thing is that we should never dilute the fact that most fans want to see the club back at the Ricoh, and the current situation is intolerable.
My response to the release of these 'plans' is along the lines of "Whatever, Tim. How about you move us back to the Ricoh first, so the *club* can get the benefit of the cheap deal currently on offer, and you and your chums can work on your colouring-in later."
No objections. Just accept the design, accept the capacity and accept its location outside the city.
Be very positive and tell sisu to go for it with 100% fans backing.
No no no. Sisu DO care about what the fans think. They want the fans desperate for a Ricoh return. That's the point of this circus. We are all supposed to be up in arms about a shit stadium and how we want the Ricoh. Then we all storm the Council House with fire and pitchforks and demand they hand it over.
They want you to object you idiot! They want protests and they want the fans forum to demand a bigger stadium. Why do you think that would be?
The 10,000 storming the council house will be fought back by the 300,000 rate payers. This is just everyday business in the council portfolio.
No no no. Sisu DO care about what the fans think. They want the fans desperate for a Ricoh return. That's the point of this circus. We are all supposed to be up in arms about a shit stadium and how we want the Ricoh. Then we all storm the Council House with fire and pitchforks and demand they hand it over.
The ratepayers are not effected either way - that's just bollocks. Oh, and no ratepayer gives a stuff anyway.
Who's gonna build it i would not trust them wankers to pay me
No objections. Just accept the design, accept the capacity and accept its location outside the city.
Be very positive and tell sisu to go for it with 100% fans backing.
You do spout some tosh.
So, the money that Cov CC have got tied up (24m or so) will come from the magic money tree will it?
And I'm a taxpayer and I care. Who's really talking bollocks here? Just 'cos you want to give it away, don't imagine everyone else in the city will stand for it.
Maybe the same magic money tree their £14M crutch came from?
No objections. Just accept the design, accept the capacity and accept its location outside the city.
Be very positive and tell sisu to go for it with 100% fans backing.
Simplistic nonsense..
so for arguments sake we go with this flawless plan. we all support the stadium. what next?!
we get a moral victory?
sisu are stumped by us minions?
no.
I seriously doubt there is any real outcome of "supporting" the new stadium. So the point of bothering is .....?
The point is, it would prove that SISU have no desire whatsoever in building a stadium. That would give one less thing to bicker about.
there is a debate to be had about their desire to build the stadium....?!
am I genuinely reading this right??
This is what the whole thread is saying, are you genuinely asking?
The ratepayers are not effected either way - that's just bollocks. Oh, and no ratepayer gives a stuff anyway.
I honestly haven't read. So this 11 page thread is about whether they will build it or not??
And here was me thinking the council vs sisu arguments were pathetic.
Anyway, supporting the stadium - Is there a serious point to be made? Other than stating the obvious?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?