some of our fans need to listen carefully to this man. the revenues are the real issue. the council lend 14million pounds to bail out acl. council refuse to show revenue numbers.
come on guys see through the woods for the trees. back sisu. coventry council are killing ccfc and many numb skulls here support them in doing it.
some of our fans need to listen carefully to this man. the revenues are the real issue. the council lend 14million pounds to bail out acl. council refuse to show revenue numbers.
come on guys see through the woods for the trees. back sisu. coventry council are killing ccfc and many numb skulls here support them in doing it.
no troll i think there is a lot of city council lovers here though. your like an scorned woman. get over it. tim fisher just showed the council for what they are. scum
Why dont you just do one you johny come lately troll SISU OUTno troll i think there is a lot of city council lovers here though. your like an scorned woman. get over it. tim fisher just showed the council for what they are. scum
some of our fans need to listen carefully to this man. the revenues are the real issue. the council lend 14million pounds to bail out acl. council refuse to show revenue numbers.
come on guys see through the woods for the trees. back sisu. coventry council are killing ccfc and many numb skulls here support them in doing it.
But MMM you've always had an anti sisu agenda. Without suggesting an alternative.
we welcome paying 400,000 pounds if we have the revenues.
we have paid 800,000 pounds in rent in the last 10 months
its clear what the issue is
so im a troll because i offer a opinion you dont agree with. sorry but numbskull is apt
so im a troll because i offer a opinion you dont agree with. sorry but numbskull is apt
No. Because you're so ill-informed and crass that such a collection of thoughts couldn't constitute opinion. Only someone on the wind-up
No matter what board you post on you can't help but be a wally.
yeh he came accross well
at the end of the day sisu are willing to have 3rd party confirm in and decide it
acl are not
so its obvious where the blame lies
the revenues are the real issue.
Mr Fisher refused to give an exact figure as to how much City's playing budget would be but said it would be nearer £4m than £1.5m.
yeh he came accross well
at the end of the day sisu are willing to have 3rd party confirm in and decide it
acl are not
so its obvious where the blame lies
Ha ha ha. ACL have had third party judgement. Or don't you remember the court case?
So now we know where the £800,000 comes from, Fisher is counting the £500,000 held in escrow by the bank since before SISU purchased the club, talk about spin, ooppps where have a heard that before, was it 8.05 am on CWR yesterday.
Amazing.......why have they suddenly started to champion the use of a third party? Didn't seem to want to do that when they just started to withhold the rent, did they.?
Would not be because they have a weakened position now, and can't dictate the agenda, by any chance....?
MMM, I think we need to stop responding to JS's pr team. They are just trying to blame anyone else for when ACL/council do call in the debt that is legally owed to them. If they have paid 800.000 in the last ten months how come this is the first we have heard about it. SHITSU would have been screaming from the roof tops if ACL were giving out wrong info, when they say NO rent has been paid since the row started.
Stuart read my question to him.
'Is it true that you haven't paid 1 penny towards rent during negotiations?'
He replied initially by admitting that was true.
He then referred to £500,000 paid from the Escrow account and a further £300,000 based on £10,000 per match.
He clearly said that the sum of £800,000 therefore had been paid in rent. What utter bollocks.
No wonder Nigel was in tears.
Fisher is delusional .
I agree. But none of it is rent. The Escrow holds £500,000 on the event of SISU defaulting. ACL were legally obliged to it.I took it to mean £800k had been paid in the last year, but nothing since the disagreements began.
Ouch - NOT buying it anymore.
Calling us, or people like us, "numbskulls" casts you adrift.
We've heard all the propaganda, the half truths and BS.
We've sussed you out now please spare us.....cheers.
How so, the club is currently operating on a salary cap limited to 65% of turnover and has one of the biggest and well financed squads in the league.
Fisher said the following this summer...
But from what he said it must be close to or better than £3M.
He was also asked whether he had shaken hands on the deal as reported and ducked this by saying that there were people in the room that would never shake hands and the prat on CWR let him get away with it!
Surely even you must acknowledge denying the club revenues handicaps our chances on this league.
But by how much, you say handicap, it may make bugger all difference, I don't really think the sums they are talking about are that significant, sure they must effect the margins, but probably only a little.. far less than making the right choice of manager that is certain.
What are the figures? If you can prove the point conclusively I'll llsten, but not without cold hard & independently verified facts. So far all you have is the say so of TF & even he hasn't put a number on it, if he could argue with numbers & prove his point he surely would as that would be the best PR, the fact he is vague make me think the argument is somewhat spurious.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?