covcity4life
Well-Known Member
were all equal(i dont wanna get banned)
What would YOUR Team be V Tranmere? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter ohitsaidwalker king power
- Start date
RoboCCFC90
Well-Known Member
Looks good to me, if bailey is injurred stick Connor Thomas in there.
scroobiustom
New Member
were all equal(i dont wanna get banned)
Only some of us are less equal than others?
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
yeah that would be my replacement too
Long time lurker, first time poster.
I can't see the pitch having improved from the Preston game unfortunately so I think we will see a lot more back to front football tonight with the midfield largely bypassed with us trying to play any kind of passing football in the final third. So on that basis I see no place in the starting line up for Moussa unfortunately - for what it's worth my line up tonight will be a 4-4-1-1 (or 4-2-3-1 dependent on your view) with Clarke up front with Elliott just off him, a midfield of Baker and Sheff right and left with Jennings and probably Bailey (if he is 100%), ahead of Thomas, central; Christie at RB (hopefully back to some kinda form) then the usual centre back pairing, Adams and keeper.
It'll be a case of horses for courses tonight. It'll be very cold and not very pretty so I'm anticipating a hard fought, scrappy and rather dull 1-0 win but personally I'd take that. Can't see many of us up there so attendance a shade below 10k.
I can't see the pitch having improved from the Preston game unfortunately so I think we will see a lot more back to front football tonight with the midfield largely bypassed with us trying to play any kind of passing football in the final third. So on that basis I see no place in the starting line up for Moussa unfortunately - for what it's worth my line up tonight will be a 4-4-1-1 (or 4-2-3-1 dependent on your view) with Clarke up front with Elliott just off him, a midfield of Baker and Sheff right and left with Jennings and probably Bailey (if he is 100%), ahead of Thomas, central; Christie at RB (hopefully back to some kinda form) then the usual centre back pairing, Adams and keeper.
It'll be a case of horses for courses tonight. It'll be very cold and not very pretty so I'm anticipating a hard fought, scrappy and rather dull 1-0 win but personally I'd take that. Can't see many of us up there so attendance a shade below 10k.
pusbccfc
Well-Known Member
What about this,
4-2-1-3 (4-3-3)
Murphy
Cyrus-Wood-Edge-Blair
Thomas-Mouss
Baker
Elliott---Clarke---Elliott
This way you have a a lot going forward, but also 3 in midfield centre mid/CAM (rather than 2 CMs in a 4-4-2).
Mouss and Thomas would sit, with Baker playing a attacking role.
Also gives Blair and cyrus/Clarke a chance to bomb on.
4-2-1-3 (4-3-3)
Murphy
Cyrus-Wood-Edge-Blair
Thomas-Mouss
Baker
Elliott---Clarke---Elliott
This way you have a a lot going forward, but also 3 in midfield centre mid/CAM (rather than 2 CMs in a 4-4-2).
Mouss and Thomas would sit, with Baker playing a attacking role.
Also gives Blair and cyrus/Clarke a chance to bomb on.
RoboCCFC90
Well-Known Member
Is Stephen Elloiot planning to cut himself in two people then?
This but J.Clarke in for Christie and Thomas in for Bailey.
CovisGod
Well-Known Member
Hahaha ! Was just thinking the same thing ! I presume he means Elliott one side and Sheff the other
ohitsaidwalker king power
Well-Known Member
:welcome: ........
RoboCCFC90
Well-Known Member
skybluegod
Well-Known Member
Ok don't shoot me down here but if we want to play 2 strikers then why not play the diamond either type I believe it didn't work because of poor management but under robins it could work. Sure we might have to drop one midfielder but it is more attacking