shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Aside from the Telegraph, is it 100% confirmed Bayliss is under contract until June 2019 with an optional year extension? Which we’ll obviously activate if true.
According to my sources on Sky Blues Talk it is 100%
Aside from the Telegraph, is it 100% confirmed Bayliss is under contract until June 2019 with an optional year extension? Which we’ll obviously activate if true.
I fully expect Bayliss to go. From what I've heard the lad loves the club but he's not on a great wage so if someone comes in and offers him x amount of thousands per week then what choice does he have realistically?
I just hope we get a decent price and there's an immediate loan back agreed.
The trouble for me is that article is at odds with his own tweet from November prior to his signing in the January .Aside from the Telegraph, is it 100% confirmed Bayliss is under contract until June 2019 with an optional year extension? Which we’ll obviously activate if true.
This is where I think the players/squad the likes of McNulty/Bayliss/will get improved contracts. Why not?
The trouble for me is that article is at odds with his own tweet from November prior to his signing in the January .
Which quoted two years .
I like that analisys!It’s ambiguous, which is frustrating because no one seems to know for certain either way. However, I get the impression the Telegraph is right on this, here’s why. Firstly, if his contract was signed in Jan 2017, surely his contract would expire in Jan 2019. IIRC his tweet said ‘the next two years’, which implies it’s an extension on his (then) current Youth contract, also, a two year deal from Nov 2016 would expire in Nov 2018, so I doubt he literally meant 2yrs from the tweet, because football contracts are almost always structured to end at the end of the season in June.
Secondly, Doyle said this (quote below) in the Telegraph today about potential departures of McNulty, JP and Bayliss, and to me, Doyle would talk like this if Bayliss wasn’t under contract. Like I said, it’s ambiguous which is annoying.
‘This club’s a big club and unless it’s a big club that comes in for them and the club say they aren’t going anywhere, they aren’t going to move sideways because this is one of the biggest clubs outside of the Championship’
Michael Doyle on how to keep Sky Blues stars this summer
I think Bayliss will almost certainly go, regardless of which league we're in.
Hopefully we'll get him back on loan for the season, which would be more likely if we are in L1.
Can't wait to have Jones and Andreu back.
Assuming he’s under contract, why do you think it’s certain?
If we’re in L1, we’ve got a decent to good chance of keeping him. We might not be able to offer big money, but, we can offer something greater than that: career development. He should stay with us for one more season, unless we’re miraculously competing for promotion from L1 (unlikely at this point).
We should definitely hold out for £2-3m, interestingly, when rejecting Derby’s bids (rising to £1m) we have no indication of how much we actually wanted for him, unlike Stevenson and Maddison.
At least with George Thomas (and Harries), we’d just been relegated so in a sense, their careers would ‘regress’ playing in a lower division.
Because he's clearly a great talent and a team will take a punt on him.
They will buy him and loan him out so he he still gets the career development that you mention.
If he has another great season next year then any club that's interested in him now will have greater competition and have to pay more. So I fully expect a club to take a punt on him.
Andreuin terms of jones and andrew
Robins said before Notts
"one of them is so so close, but we are not allowed to go there" so which one is it?
against notts we wasted 2 bench places with the loanees anyway so even if they are not getting on, would prefer our players there