Who wants a public enquiry? (1 Viewer)

Gosford Green · Feb 13, 2015

Text book SISU move. Attempt to alienate one set of fans and pick another groups of fans that are owner friendly, set them against each other. Divide and rule.

Les Reid has the audacity to say that the SISU out group might lead the club to cease existence. the people that pay him will cause that very soon.

Gosford Green · Feb 13, 2015

``Peter Ward, an "international businessman" who runs the Coventry City supporters' SCG``

Can anyone shed light on this group ?

Steve.B50 · Feb 13, 2015

Gosford Green said:
Text book SISU move. Attempt to alienate one set of fans and pick another groups of fans that are owner friendly, set them against each other. Divide and rule.

Les Reid has the audacity to say that the SISU out group might lead the club to cease existence. the people that pay him will cause that very soon.

Hence one of the reasons I called the Observer distribution offices in Redditch and insisted its never put through my door again

Nick · Feb 13, 2015

Nice to see the Paranoia flowing.

Ian1779 · Feb 13, 2015

DazzleTommyDazzle said:
So so you think there has already been "an enquiry" into the administration process?

is there a link to a copy of the report (I understand that asking for a link is the correct etiquette for this site).

Well if there hasn't been.. it demonstrates that ACL merely rejected the CVA through sheer spite.

DazzleTommyDazzle · Feb 13, 2015

Ian1779 said:
Well if there hasn't been.. it demonstrates that ACL merely rejected the CVA through sheer spite.

So we're agreed then - no enquiry.

No doubt all those who are so keen on enquiries will start campaigning for one.

Ian1779 · Feb 13, 2015

DazzleTommyDazzle said:
So we're agreed then - no enquiry.

No doubt all those who are so keen on enquiries will start campaigning for one.

Not necessarily agreed. There may well have been one... I did wonder previously if one had occurred and that's why the admin/liquidation had been dragged out.

So either there was one and nothing came of it... or ACL rejected the CVA on the premise of needing one.. and did fuck all about it.

Sky Blue Dal · Feb 13, 2015

Total waste of time and tax payers money... Just like the JR.

Les Reid, maybe you can tell us where the new Stadium is going to be built and when as promised by our owners INSTEADING of intentionally working for SISU to deflecting
the issue by always bringing up the Ricoh.

Banging on about the Ricoh is like flogging a dead horse. The Wasp owe it now.

DazzleTommyDazzle · Feb 13, 2015

Ian1779 said:
Not necessarily agreed. There may well have been one... I did wonder previously if one had occurred and that's why the admin/liquidation had been dragged out.

So either there was one and nothing came of it... or ACL rejected the CVA on the premise of needing one.. and did fuck all about it.

This all started with demands from "most fans" for a public enquiry about the sale of ACL to Wasps.

Personally, I think it'd end up being a waste of money as most (not all, to be fair) of these things are.

However I wouldn't be against it in principle - but can see no reason why it wouldn't also include the events and behaviour that (in my opinion) led us into this mess.

Nick · Feb 13, 2015

DazzleTommyDazzle said:
This all started with demands from "most fans" for a public enquiry about the sale of ACL to Wasps.

Personally, I think it'd end up being a waste of money as most (not all, to be fair) of these things are.

However I wouldn't be against it in principle - but can see no reason why it wouldn't also include the events and behaviour that (in my opinion) led us into this mess.

It would be good if somebody could do one on all sides all the way back to HR.

rupert_bear · Feb 13, 2015

Not reading all this but I have two questions How many members does this SCG group have ? and how many subscribers does GMK have, when it's working that is. Or this London supporters group for that matter.

DazzleTommyDazzle · Feb 13, 2015

Nick said:
It would be good if somebody could do one on all sides all the way back to HR.

And the problem is that it'd probably report about as quickly as the Chilcot enquiry.

Wonder which division we'd be in by then......

Nick · Feb 13, 2015

rupert_bear said:
Not reading all this but I have two questions How many members does this SCG group have ? and how many subscribers does GMK have, when it's working that is. Or this London supporters group for that matter.

This site has way more members than them all. Does that mean what I say goes?*

*I am not trying to say it does here.

Ian1779 · Feb 13, 2015

rupert_bear said:
Not reading all this but I have two questions How many members does this SCG group have ? and how many subscribers does GMK have, when it's working that is. Or this London supporters group for that matter.

Hypothetical question..... If on one hand we have a Trust that can only rally around 10% of opinion from it's members for example, and other groups (although smaller) have a far greater majority of their members engaging with them...

Does it make one groups opinions more important than the other?

John_Silletts_Nose · Feb 13, 2015

Nick said:
It would be good if somebody could do one on all sides all the way back to HR.

I'd like to go back to the mis-judged investment in Detroit Express by CCFC, I think there was a conflict of interest and due diligence may not have been conducted.

Gosford Green · Feb 13, 2015

SCG - Supporters Consultation Group I guess

Is there also a stadium consultation group ?

So transparent.

Captain Dart · Feb 13, 2015

rupert_bear said:
Not reading all this but I have two questions How many members does this SCG group have ? and how many subscribers does GMK have, when it's working that is. Or this London supporters group for that matter.

GMK is dead, there is no website, yet Les Reid cites it in his latest article. Joke or what?

albatross · Feb 13, 2015

There are 6126 members on SBT (thats what it said this morning anyway).

This is probably the most representative forum and the whole spectrum of Views are expressed here

James Smith · Feb 13, 2015

Gosford Green said:
SCG - Supporters Consultation Group I guess

Is there also a stadium consultation group ?

So transparent.

There was but it was folded into the SCG last year I think.

Joy has no limits when we look to the sky.

Deleted member 5849 · Feb 13, 2015

DazzleTommyDazzle said:
However I wouldn't be against it in principle - but can see no reason why it wouldn't also include the events and behaviour that (in my opinion) led us into this mess.

It'd have to be a proper investigation int everything mind, not just procedure.

Bring it on, unearth all the bodies... and why not?

tisza · Feb 13, 2015

correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the SCG by invite only?

letsallsingtogether · Feb 13, 2015

Nick said:
It would be good if somebody could do one on all sides all the way back to HR.

Who actually gives a shit anymore?
What will it achieve?
Team is fucked club is fucked

Gazolba · Feb 13, 2015

Ian1779 said:
If there's nothing to hide then why not.

Who will pay for the enquiry? Probably the taxpayers! And if the result does not satisfy everyone, who will pay for the enquiry into the enquiry?

Who wants a public enquiry? (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 5849

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread