They don't.
Proof?
All I'm saying is the most important stakeholder in any sports club is its fans.
As I've said IF a majority of fans supported the move then who are we to tell them their wrong?
Because according to their CEO the majority don't attend games that used to.
Remember our "protest" was a few people on a hill with tenfold at least inside. The rest were silent stayaways. Still you go now don't you - so join Italia in franchise heaven.
If the owners say we need to move or go out of business
8% of their first game was 2500, around half of what they were getting in Wycombe.
I remember thousands on the city centre march.
No I went once.
Because according to their CEO the majority don't attend games that used to.
Remember our "protest" was a few people on a hill with tenfold at least inside. The rest were silent stayaways. Still you go now don't you - so join Italia in franchise heaven.
Around half, more than half or less than half?
Can you also provide transcripts of all those who attended that they all supported the move or is thus the language of made up bollocks being spoken?
It's known that the company has negative value of £14.25 million.
It's known wasps holdings is owned by Camango which has one share issued to Derek Richardson
It's known Camango has a parent company called moonstone limited which seems to have a company number not recognised by companies house. Therefore it's likely to be a Florida based investment portfolio company which has subsidiaries in Malta and Jersey.
Given that you constantly bleat haft CCFC will never own the Ricoh why are you happy wasps don't own it but comango (or is it moonstone) do? Who are moonstone and what is their interest? Why has the holding company got such a negative worth?
Is ACL part of this group of companies, or is ACL held separately but maybe with the same ultimate owner? I don't know the answer, but I can't find anything official that suggets all the companies are in the same group.
Can't provide that sorry, its just an opinion.
Can you provide evidence that a majority of Wasps fans were against it to prove your not talking bollocks?
If the owners say we need to move or go out of business (and it is proven) I would say most fans would favour the move.
I would say that no fans believed we really needed to go to Northampton because of the high rent and access to revenues.
It would never happen, as there are always alternatives.
Minor point? It was my main point.
Once again you've proved your class by resorting to name calling.
98% of shares in wasps are owned by holdings. All of holdings is owned by comango and their parent company is moonstone.
Okay, so the alternatives are we need to get rid of players, cut costs and drop down two divisions ?
.... or move and stay in the top flight ?
No, we don't need to move. We will just stay at the Ricoh paying rent without significant access to revenues, hopefully Wasps will jack up the rent as well. Why? because it worked so well for Wasps at Adams Park...So... Glasgow Rangers are in severe crisis. Having gone pop once, there's a very real chance they could go again, and this time properly.
If they did, there's a nice large stadium without a tenant. It's larger than the Ricoh too. Just think of all that income generation!
CCFC would have NO CHOICE but to move there. It'd be for the team's sake.
Which ironically is what you are doing hidden behind your keyboard. You really are dumb arent you.
What am I supposed to be hiding from?
Oh dear.
No, we don't need to move. We will just stay at the Ricoh paying rent without significant access to revenues, hopefully Wasps will jack up the rent as well. Why? because it worked so well for Wasps at Adams Park...
OK now I'm confused. Have I threatened you or something? What am I supposed to be hiding from?
And finally with regard to Wasps being the biggest team in the City, that's clearly rubbish too. Would anyone here seriously propose that if you walked out into the street and asked people who their favourite team was you would get more people saying Wasps than CCFC?
As proven by "intheknow" who makes a point of saying there is no real way to make money without owning a stadium on here...
As for the DAB thing, what pisses me off about that is that I can't recall CWR ever doing the same for Coventry's own rugby side, it would have been great to have coverage from the Richmond game for example. In that at least, the BBC have shown themselves to be less than impartial - as others have said the better thing to do would be to treat both sides similarly, and/or relegate Wasps' games to internet feeds.
Not confused, dumb.
You said I had showed my class by being insulting, which is ironic as in that statement you are insulting me, thus showing your class.
Not sure what alternative tangent you are on re threats, but you, like I, are hidden by anonymity behind a keyboard. Is that easy enough for you to understand. Happy to meet face to face for you to explain my class level if you so wish.
Was I insulting you? I was just explaining that you have shown your true self off. Is that bad?
Two things strike me in this thread.
First of all, Wasps existence has no detrimental affect on Ccfc whatsoever.
. Most Coventry citizens that I've met welcome Wasps, I've met far more local kids who support them than CCFC as well.
Most Coventry citizens that I've met welcome Wasps, I've met far more local kids who support them than CCFC as well.
So... Glasgow Rangers are in severe crisis. Having gone pop once, there's a very real chance they could go again, and this time properly.
If they did, there's a nice large stadium without a tenant. It's larger than the Ricoh too. Just think of all that income generation!
CCFC would have NO CHOICE but to move there. It'd be for the team's sake.
Most of the ones who defend the move based on Wasps needed there own revenues/stadium then contradict themselves by saying the complete opposite with regards to CCFC and then don't understand why people question their opinions.
I'd support the phoenix team which would start at the bottom, become CCFC and play at the Ricoh.
Rangers got liquidated a few seasons ago so the name just goes on and evidently their history.
Thanks. I suggest Sisu take CCFC to Glasgow call them Glasgow City and allow us to start again.
Unfortunately Linfield will be moving to the Ricoh in their place.
I will only support a big named team
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?