The CableGuy
Well-Known Member
Sure. So why aren't they asking SISU relevant questions as well?
Last edited:
Why have BBC CWR sided with SISU? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter The CableGuy
- Start date
Sure. So why aren't they asking SISU relevant questions as well?
cov_george
Well-Known Member
Don't believe sisu are too concerned about breaking contracts
señor Santiago
Well-Known Member
The way Linnell reads out the scores like its final score pisses me off
DazzleTommyDazzle
Well-Known Member
This is starting to piss me off.
Is he afraid to say he wants to speak to someone from SISU?
Is he afraid to say he wants to speak to someone from SISU?
Delboycov
Active Member
Sent 3 texts now and an email asking him that question but can't see him reading them out...
DazzleTommyDazzle
Well-Known Member
Fletcher - need to find new owners who will put in £30m, £40m or £50 m per year.
Wow, those losses are really building up!
Also said that rent was set while the club was in the Premiership. Err, no, it wasn't.
I think we all agree that the football club needs to own the ground, but he's being a little simplistic in his analysis.
Wow, those losses are really building up!
Also said that rent was set while the club was in the Premiership. Err, no, it wasn't.
I think we all agree that the football club needs to own the ground, but he's being a little simplistic in his analysis.
deanocity3
New Member
I remember him and JH having a set too live on air in 1981 when JH went for all seater stadium,Linnell was lost for words when JH said we both have beards but we will never agree on this subject.
cloughie
Well-Known Member
Never been a hater of linnell but today he was drivel and embarrassing
also sent 3 texts ...............but none read out..They were not that hard a questions
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Fletcher is talking garbage if he's said the losses are on that scale-our only expenditure is on wages (since the rent seems optional) and those will be, including all non footballing staff, at a maximum of £5-6m a year. He's even wider of the mark than Linnell.
Reckon he was potentially referring to a post operation Premiership campaign success.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Reckon he was potentially referring to a post operation Premiership campaign success.
Kevin Kyle scoring 5 in 50, those were the days Wingy. Ee-aw!
The only surprise here is that we're expressing surprise when there is none .For the whole epoch of this SAGA ,their coverage has been Skewed towards the SISU viewpoint .Now that possibly suggests Bias, Fear ,or Ignorance of how the Fanbase /folk of this City actually feel about /towards the clubs owners.Strangely while having a pint before the game today this topic cropped up with a member of the printed press,he kind of concurred but thought the CT was equally biased the other way.
coundonskyblue
New Member
Unfortunately I suspect he was drunk, hence his historically innacuate performance.
I can accept someone who has a different opinion to me, however I cannot accept historical innacuracies.
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
It is because most of its readers are cov fans.
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
I don't think you do, hence why you say he was drunk. I've no axe to grind, wasn't particularly keen on the chap, but had his point of view. Doesn't mean he was drunk! He'll know more about it than you or I or anyone else on this forum who's slagged him off.
coundonskyblue
New Member
He certainly sounded drunk. He didn't sound his normal self.
D
Deleted member 4439
Guest
At the risk of drawing ire and contempt, and as much as I deplore SISU for the way they've handled their communications with the fans, could someone explain again how ACL's actions have helped the club? Please don't simply reply with "because SISU mentioned liquidation". I'm asking not to be contentious - I simply don't understand, but would like to.
hutch1972
Well-Known Member
PF has forgotten more than we know about the ricoh in the last 8 years or so, if anybody listens again they will find he is accurate in a lot of things regarding the ownership of the whole stadium.
I dislike sisu and wish they had never arrived here , BUT as has been mentioned before the current owners of the stadium were meant to be CUSTODIANS not the outright owners. Forget the Higgs share ,they will sell back to anybody, its the council that is the problem because now their nose is in the trough they will never sell to anybody.
Regarding the 40-50 mill PF alluded to ,he was talking over x amount of years not per season. I personally appreciated his honesty when he was here and as he said one of the reasons he left was because he felt too many lies would be told as to how we were being shafted.
By the way ,he wasn't drunk everyone from Burnley sounds like that.
I think you are being a little humble. No one knows more than you.
Black6Osprey
New Member
well said.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
I'd be astounded if CWR let anyone drunk on the air.
coundonskyblue
New Member
<p>
He seems to forget he signed the rental agreement. He also seemed to forget what division the club was in at the time.
He seems to forget he signed the rental agreement. He also seemed to forget what division the club was in at the time.
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
Because forcing a club I to admin is a stupid thing to do
warwickcccfc
New Member
skybluehugh
New Member
Also the last 3 texts he did read out we're all anti ACL. Not one against the tossers who own us. And I don't care what side people are on that sort of % against ACL is no way representative of how the fans are divided.
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
I have and he wasn't. It's just because he went against the grain, no more to it than that.
Listen to it again, Torchy....and tell me isn't slurring his words....
Delboycov
Active Member
He glossed over the many texts urging him to get answers from SISU as it didn't fit in with his own agenda of taking ACL to task. "Yes we've asked them loads of times" wasn't good enough as far as I'm concerned. Joy Seppala and Tim Fisher were at the game where they had reporters! He wasn't too fussed with finding out what the hell they're up to...where we're going to be playing Friday...where is this golden share held. No he was just obsessed with finding out how admin was going to help the Club when PKWH etc have already explained their position on this, whether people believe it or not!
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
[video=youtube;1-fWpmGSC-c]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-fWpmGSC-c[/video]
DazzleTommyDazzle
Well-Known Member
That's exactly how I saw (heard?) it.
warwickcccfc
New Member
Some of his claims were utter drivel.
Come on Torchy, do you think West Ham have bought the Olympic Stadium?? :facepalm:
Having said that, you do think SISU are '...our saviours...'
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
I Bet you could she must have bigger B....cks then most of us is she really a he another of lifes mysteries she was at the game yesterday with a scalf over her face could have been Fletcher for all we know never see them both together
Well the club can allow anyone they like to broadcast matches, and Linnell does the post match meet & greets in the corporate section - Guess who pays for that?
Quite frankly he is so biased he may well be in breach of the BBC's code of conduct. Certainly he seems to be gaining a lot of resentment amongst fans over his disgraceful stance.
Thats because Jimmy Hill was a legend who knew what he was talking about - whereas Linnell is a brown clown, who seems to be utterly in league with SiSU, is unbelievably biased, went out of his way to insult oggy's wife and is an all round vile piece of work - no wonder he is on the side of his paymaster's. The beeb could do a lot worse than get rid of these 3 idiots and get some decent presenters