Well the club can allow anyone they like to broadcast matches, and Linnell does the post match meet & greets in the corporate section - Guess who pays for that?
Quite frankly he is so biased he may well be in breach of the BBC's code of conduct. Certainly he seems to be gaining a lot of resentment amongst fans over his disgraceful stance.
Fletcher - need to find new owners who will put in £30m, £40m or £50 m per year.
Wow, those losses are really building up!
Also said that rent was set while the club was in the Premiership. Err, no, it wasn't.
I think we all agree that the football club needs to own the ground, but he's being a little simplistic in his analysis.
It's only 'disgraceful' because you disagree with it. No doubt if he was rabidly anit-SISU you wouldn't be complaining about him being in breach of the BBC code of conduct, you'd probably declare him to be fair and balanced.
Some people just can't stand the thought that there are people out there who disagree with them. That's life, get over it and stop crying.
My concern was the lack of balance -this is the BBC after all.
SL was highly concerned over ACL's reasoning for their court case but seemed completely unconcerned with the many ( and some would say more significant) questions that SISU had not answered.
So happy for people to disagree, no tears, but if you're in the BBC, try to show an even handed approach.
PF has forgotten more than we know about the ricoh in the last 8 years or so, if anybody listens again they will find he is accurate in a lot of things regarding the ownership of the whole stadium.
I dislike sisu and wish they had never arrived here , BUT as has been mentioned before the current owners of the stadium were meant to be CUSTODIANS not the outright owners. Forget the Higgs share ,they will sell back to anybody, its the council that is the problem because now their nose is in the trough they will never sell to anybody.
Regarding the 40-50 mill PF alluded to ,he was talking over x amount of years not per season. I personally appreciated his honesty when he was here and as he said one of the reasons he left was because he felt too many lies would be told as to how we were being shafted.
By the way ,he wasn't drunk everyone from Burnley sounds like that.
They'll be plenty who'll say he is being balanced - it depends on your viewpoint.
Put is this way, if he was being blatantly anti-SISU, how many of you would be starting threads on here about his lack of balance and complaining that he wasn't giving SISU a fair hearing? None of you would do that. There are so many people on here that have a position so entrenched on SISU that they jump up and down hysterically if they perceive that someone in the media is not 'onside'.
Quite frankly, some of the comments in this thread have been embarrassing.
Well the club can allow anyone they like to broadcast matches, and Linnell does the post match meet & greets in the corporate section - Guess who pays for that?
Quite frankly he is so biased he may well be in breach of the BBC's code of conduct. Certainly he seems to be gaining a lot of resentment amongst fans over his disgraceful stance.
Does every BBC employee actually have to be impartial on all matters or is that just something that people have come to believe? It'd be almost impossible to maintain.
BBC and ITV when reporting have to give a totally impartial commentary, so as to be fair with both sides. I haven't got a problem with questions being asked, but when they are blatantly beyond the pale, and one sided people like Linnel show themselves for what they really are. When he pushed PWKH for an answer about who was "Interested" in CCFC. he was wayyyyyy out of order.
They'll be plenty who'll say he is being balanced - it depends on your viewpoint.
Put is this way, if he was being blatantly anti-SISU, how many of you would be starting threads on here about his lack of balance and complaining that he wasn't giving SISU a fair hearing? None of you would do that. There are so many people on here that have a position so entrenched on SISU that they jump up and down hysterically if they perceive that someone in the media is not 'onside'.
Quite frankly, some of the comments in this thread have been embarrassing.
That's odd, I was reading a thread critiquing one bloke for doing a poor job. Where was this stuff about a BBC conspiracy, it sounds fascinating?
Oh, and is he really a lizard? Was David Icke right after all?
The most hilarious thing Linnell said was that he would be willing to chair a broadcasted discussion between ACL and the club on CWR.
Answering one of my own posts......Would Linnel ask Septic Seppala who actually owns CCFC? and expect to get an answer!
That's odd, I was reading a thread critiquing one bloke for doing a poor job. Where was this stuff about a BBC conspiracy, it sounds fascinating?
Oh, and is he really a lizard? Was David Icke right after all?
There is, have a read through.
I think he does alright considering some of the numbskulls that ring in.
You only think that 'cos he reads your texts out.6There is, have a read through.
I think he does alright considering some of the numbskulls that ring in.
They'll be plenty who'll say he is being balanced - it depends on your viewpoint.
Put is this way, if he was being blatantly anti-SISU, how many of you would be starting threads on here about his lack of balance and complaining that he wasn't giving SISU a fair hearing? None of you would do that. There are so many people on here that have a position so entrenched on SISU that they jump up and down hysterically if they perceive that someone in the media is not 'onside'.
Quite frankly, some of the comments in this thread have been embarrassing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?