alexccfc99
Well-Known Member
Venus wanted Slade to stay and Fisher ignored him and stepped in to bring MR back, which caused Venus to resign
Venus wanted Slade to stay and Fisher ignored him and stepped in to bring MR back, which caused Venus to resignDon’t Robins and Fisher get along well? Pretty sure he was heavily involved in getting Robins to come back as well.
But the amounts that they are rumoured to be owed also included interest on the money they loaned, so they could still have made more money than they actually put in. Plus they were charging management fees or some such, so were getting money there as well.This is just a joke.
They lost a fortune investing in ccfc, it lost them millions. How people can seriously believe they were making money is beyond belief.
Their ownership was an unmitigated disaster for ALL parties, including them.
So did he pay anything?Share sale wasn't it?
If he paid for shares it would be undisclosed between the shareholdersSo did he pay anything?
Thank fuck he did!Venus wanted Slade to stay and Fisher ignored him and stepped in to bring MR back, which caused Venus to resign
Venus really was an arrogant, smug, nasty piece of work and from what I’ve heard none of the players at the time had anything good to say about him eitherThank fuck he did!
No, Robinson and Richardson brought our club to the brink of extinction.Why do these two fucking cretins keep getting brought up, almost brought our club to extinction, I wouldn’t piss on either of them if they were on fire.
Have you forgotten Fisher & Seppela moved us 35 miles away and it would have been further, then just when things were picking up gates on the rise she did again to Brum. I will agree Richardson, Robinson & McGinnity were at best useless, but don’t excuse those other two cretins.No, Robinson and Richardson brought our club to the brink of extinction.
Whether you like them or not, Seppela and Fisher kept the club going
The second time we were effectively chucked out by Wasps, the first time we couldnt afford the 1.3 million rent, ACL and council, wouldnt budge, backed by the Trust, and were saying tough you signed up for it etc. the Trust actually wanted the club to go bust and start again as a phoenix club.Have you forgotten Fisher & Seppela moved us 35 miles away and it would have been further, then just when things were picking up gates on the rise she did again to Brum. I will agree Richardson, Robinson & McGinnity were at best useless, but don’t excuse those other two cretins.
No, Robinson and Richardson brought our club to the brink of extinction.
Whether you like them or not, Seppela and Fisher kept the club going
Oh my god, what a shock! What team was I supporting at Wembley?I mean they quite literally didn’t.
First distinction to make is that any money originally invested was not that of Joys, it was money trusted to her hedge fund, so the lady never lost a penny. Tim made a nice wage out of the club for many years.
Eventually after all the artificial debt they loaded against CCFC DK came and supposedly paid that off = The scumbags lost very little …..of their investors money….apart from on lawyers for fruitless court cases.
Oh my god, what a shock! What team was I supporting at Wembley?
CorrectI thought I heard somewhere that Fisher didn't take a wage? Might be wrong but thought I heard that somewhere.
Correct
Nothing in the accounts show it either
You have no idea what DK paid and for whatFirst distinction to make is that any money originally invested was not that of Joys, it was money trusted to her hedge fund, so the lady never lost a penny. Tim made a nice wage out of the club for many years.
Eventually after all the artificial debt they loaded against CCFC DK came and supposedly paid that off = The scumbags lost very little …..of their investors money….apart from on lawyers for fruitless court cases.
Don't have early accounts but not in recent periodsHe’d have charged consultant fees I assume? I am sure there were director salaries at some point
Don't have early accounts but not in recent periods
That sounds right now you mention it. I can't imagine he was doing it for the love of the job to be fair - especially given the dogs abuse he received (deserved or not).He’d have charged consultant fees I assume? I am sure there were director salaries at some point
There was a rumour (totally unsubstantiated of course!) that he'd get a bonus dependent on successful conclusion of... events.That sounds right now you mention it. I can't imagine he was doing it for the love of the job to be fair - especially given the dogs abuse he received (deserved or not).
Events? Like moving us away from unsustainable rents etc?There was a rumour (totally unsubstantiated of course!) that he'd get a bonus dependent on successful conclusion of... events.
Successful conclusion to ground issues / successful sale of club. That sort of thing.Events? Like moving us away from unsustainable rents etc?
Would still have to be declared as a connected partyThen paid as a consultant
Let’s just face it, the reason for them still being in the background is because until DK pays them a significant sum of money, we are in theory still owned by SISU. The stalemate on Vik’s transfer is down to DK needing more so he can pay them off.Would still have to be declared as a connected party
SISU could have ( that would be my route anyway)
Why and how?Let’s just face it, the reason for them still being in the background is because until DK pays them a significant sum of money, we are in theory still owned by SISU. The stalemate on Vik’s transfer is down to DK needing more so he can pay them off.
Because DK has sold himself as the messiah but not given you all of the factsWhy and how?
What are the facts?Because DK has sold himself as the messiah but not given you all of the facts
Those are them… DK needs substantial amount to pay Sisu off, he needs to sell Vik for this and maybe Gus (hopefully not).What are the facts?
What's the source for claim one?Those are them… DK needs substantial amount to pay Sisu off, he needs to sell Vik for this and maybe Gus (hopefully not).
DB is out of the way as he was not happy.
Controlling CEO with no capital.
Another well known loyal funder/supporter of the club has also been shut out.
What's the source for claim one?
I doubt very much SISU has let all its charges on the club's assets be satisfied but still needs "paying off"Those are them… DK needs substantial amount to pay Sisu off, he needs to sell Vik for this and maybe Gus (hopefully not).
DB is out of the way as he was not happy.
Controlling CEO with no capital.
Another well known loyal funder/supporter of the club has also been shut out.
I doubt very much SISU has let all its charges on the club's assets be satisfied but still needs "paying off"
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Total claptrap !Let’s just face it, the reason for them still being in the background is because until DK pays them a significant sum of money, we are in theory still owned by SISU. The stalemate on Vik’s transfer is down to DK needing more so he can pay them off.
Ok, I have no problem with anyone who disagrees or has other facts.Total claptrap !
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?