With Fat Freddy Offski does this open money up for a loan or two? (1 Viewer)

[Paxman II]

All depends on the clauses placed in his contract. RR bought him I think and he was a canny old fella with contracts. There must be something of value in that contract for the club to suggest he goes find a club to take him and he's done at CCFC. Makes me think as Nick has suggested a game ratio may be in there somewhere and that would give the club a right to sack or loan him with wage reduction or some other clause where after so few games he can be transferred for free and provided the wages do not fall below a certain level, say 50% of what he was on? If not the case then why get rid and continue to pay 8k a week knowing we had such a thin squad and he could contribute?
Truth is though probably none of those as I would not have signed a contract like that myself!

 

---

[Astute]

AT has made this comment for one of three reasons.

1, To let clubs know he is available - Unlikely as he said he is not trying and is unfit

2, There is a clause in his contract that will reduce his wage bill somehow - My favourite

3, A kick up the arse for him - Another one?

 

[SkyBlue_Bear83]

I think Eastwood would be on around 5-6k p/w, I hope it does open up an opportunity for a loan.

 

[Sir Digby Chicken Caesar]

I can't see any team being interested in Freddy that he would want to play for.

 

[BackRoomRummermill]

Freddy is a good league one player, not good enough for this league

 

[blueflint]

when will you all realise no loanees coming sisu wont pay for them