Wood Penalty Incident. (1 Viewer)

woody11462

Well-Known Member
After being away for the weekend I have caught up on the match highlights and I feel a bit sorry for Wood with the decision to give a penalty. Yes, there was contact but it was totally manufactured by Healy.

As the ball went up in the air, Healy stops, takes a look at Wood coming forward to the high ball and he purposely steps into Wood and makes sure he goes down as if he's been clattered. Wood is going forward with his eyes on the ball and his one intention is to get off the ground to win the header. Healy knows he isn't gonna win it so forces the contact to take place as it does to con a foul out of the ref. I suppose watching it in real time it looks like a clear cut foul but I think it is more due to clever play by Healy.
 

blueflint

Well-Known Member
if healy was our player he would be given standing ovation what goes around comes around
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
It was a clear penalty.

Not intentional, but really clumsy by Wood. I think we'd have won the game without them having a PK to get back in it.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
Good work by Healy plus naive play by Wood equals a penalty.
No argmuents from me in regards to the decision.
 

RichieGunns

New Member
Plus woods eyes are on the ball the whole time...his body langauge is that of a person getting ready to jump for the ball...not someone who is going to commit a blatant foul on a player right in front of the ref.

And he definately looked back at the charging Wood and then backed into him. It was a blatant attempt to get a foul and he managed it...
 

ccfcrob

Well-Known Member
It was one of the most blatant penalties ive ever seen a ridiculous challenge that didnt need to be made and cost us 3 points because we crumbled after that
 

skybluelee

Well-Known Member
Cant believe that even through the most sky blue tinted glasses anybody can claim that it wasnt a nailed on pen. Come on people.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top