The shame is they have us talking about what a great location it would be and the possible hurdles they may face in building it.
When in reality we are experiencing exactly the same as last time. Last time like you say architect's were paid. 3 sites had been identified, non were in the Coventry City Council jurisdiction. The SCG were formed. The drawings looked great.
Yet by the end of it all most of us ended concluded it was a load of rubbish to allow us to be in Northampton putting pressure on ACL financially. Whilst also applying pressure through legal avenues. This seems to be going the identical way.
I would need to see a legally binding contract and a big non refundable deposit paid to the stadium developers, before I believed any different.
I wouldn't put it past them to try and buy some land at some point which will enable them to sell Ryton.