Sent this yesterday (no response so far)....
Dear Mr Clarke,
I was interested in the contents of your presentation at the above. Particularly the following quoted in various media: -
“The problem with the Fit and Proper Person (owners’) Test is it requires people to have done things that are seen as wrong or illegal or unethical"
As a Coventry supporter I implore you to reconcile that last word "unethical" with the actions taken by the Club's fit & proper owners (in the eyes of the Football League), such as stopping paying rent owed because they thought it too high. That is one of many examples I could provide, although is a mighty fine in itself!
Explanation, promptly is what I seek - not referring to Football League rules x, y or z...after-all, by referring to the Coventry City F.C. circumstances in your presentation - the standard Football League response to "not comment on individual cases" surely no longer applies.
Dear Mr Clarke,
I was interested in the contents of your presentation at the above. Particularly the following quoted in various media: -
“The problem with the Fit and Proper Person (owners’) Test is it requires people to have done things that are seen as wrong or illegal or unethical"
As a Coventry supporter I implore you to reconcile that last word "unethical" with the actions taken by the Club's fit & proper owners (in the eyes of the Football League), such as stopping paying rent owed because they thought it too high. That is one of many examples I could provide, although is a mighty fine in itself!
Explanation, promptly is what I seek - not referring to Football League rules x, y or z...after-all, by referring to the Coventry City F.C. circumstances in your presentation - the standard Football League response to "not comment on individual cases" surely no longer applies.