Nick
Administrator
Nothing as yet, shock.
Rumour: Hoffman and Elliot takeover negotiations (5 Viewers)
- Thread starter Evo1883
- Start date
Nothing as yet, shock.
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
Wasn't it stated 3 years with a further two year option?
stupot07
Well-Known Member
Oxford dictionary
Scab:
3.1derogatory A person who refuses to strike or join a trade union or who takes the place of a striking worker.
Strike:
(of employees) refuse to work as a form of organized protest, typically in an attempt to obtain a particular concession or concessions from their employer.
There was no strike, therefore there were no scabs.
C**t:
1.1 An unpleasant or stupid person.
There are a few of these though.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Scab:
3.1derogatory A person who refuses to strike or join a trade union or who takes the place of a striking worker.
Strike:
(of employees) refuse to work as a form of organized protest, typically in an attempt to obtain a particular concession or concessions from their employer.
There was no strike, therefore there were no scabs.
C**t:
1.1 An unpleasant or stupid person.
There are a few of these though.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Last edited:
ajsccfc
Well-Known Member
This is beyond stupid, even by your standards.
Irish Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Well that puts the whole move into perspective. How was anyone supposed to know what the truth of the matter was, temporary move or moving for good. The fact is that you cannot believe a word that comes out of his mouth.
The independent view from the judge was that there was no good reason to move our club out of Coventry and that the only reason was to distress ACL. Therefore he was trying to promote the best interests of Sisu over the best interests of CCFC and its supporters.
Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Tim has already proved that judges know fa about the law
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
You have no way of knowing that.
In fact if you were clever enough you would know that the 3 years was to build a new stadium and after 18 months nothing had happened.
To help you even more CCFC had just financed a new pitch at Sixfields so they were in for the long stay and were only going through the stadium motions to pacify the weak FL.
In reality CCFC were only out in Northampton to put ACL into administration (court papers) and who knows if they could bluff the FL into enough time to obtain the freehold on the Ricoh.
In fact Seppella had already said CCFC would only come back as owners and as such how can CCC be blamed for planning without CCFC.
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
All the questions below have the same answer. "No".
Should SISU have withheld rent?
Should Fisher have moved us to Northampton?
Did CCC need to hand the Ricoh to Wasps?
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
Sisu post only gets opened at 11 when Joy gets in.
Skyblueweeman
Well-Known Member
3 weeks mate.
Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Obviously you know what it is so spill the beans, so that I can get angrier by the minute till it is announced
HuckerbyDublinWhelan
Well-Known Member
So where are we at with this rumoured Tuesday news?
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Why would you care anyway?
If you lived in Northampton and CCFC rolled into town you'd support them and wouldn't give a fuck about CCFC fans left stranded with no team to support.
Being lectured by you on franchising is like turning up to a lecture on Good Childcare Tips and find its being presented by the McCanns.
Irish Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Looking at the answers to the first two questions, should City fans have gone into Sixfields?
Apparently the Prime Minister is making a major announcement at 11.15am according to MSN.
Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Do you really have to be such a nasty piece of work?
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
he wouldnt make jokes about a dogs death. innocent childs death is ok though......
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
I have always taken the view not to judge my fellow fans whether that is attending Sixfields, NOPM or starving the club of income by not renewing their ST until SISU have gone. I realise others are quicker to judge and pigeonhole. Fair enough.
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
Both can exist here. In fact I would even say that both need each other to survive.
CCFC need to get a good deal with Wasps and Wasps need to make it financially viable for CCFC.
It won't happen under SISU though.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
I think you can look at other people's attitudes on here closer to home and find far nastier.
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
Why are we going over sixfields again. Let that horrible episode, and your resentments with it, die.
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
Yep, not a word on RBs attitude towards fellow fans.
Nick
Administrator
It was temporary. Every agreement and arrangement was temporary.
Thats even without using hindsight.
Can people really not grasp that?
hill83
Well-Known Member
Yes it was temporary. I also believed that it would be temporary. And it proved to be temporary.
Some people didn't believe that it would be and who can blame them with the rest of the bollocks we've been told.
Can you grasp that?
Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Was he talking about a couple who effectively have lost their child, besides RBS attitude to fellow fans is no different to the attitude the other way.
Nick
Administrator
I can, but maybe not when they are trying to tell others it wasn't temporary to make out it isn't different from Wasps.
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
It's a stick LAST likes to beat people with every now and again. It'll die down until the next time he uses it.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
My views on the wretched McCanns is no secret on this forum.
Your second comment says all we need to know
hill83
Well-Known Member
They can be filed under 'plonkers'
Nick
Administrator
This is the pattern.
Person A makes a silly statement
Person B uses facts and evidence to counter the statement or totally disprove it
Person A either says "stop defending SISU" or brings up Sixfields.
Nick
Administrator
Can you point some out?
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
Person B thinks person A is an idiot
Person A thinks person B is an idiot
They proceed to argue the same points they've been arguing for the last 5 years with no change in stance.
Nobody wins.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
You don't deny being a nasty piece of work then. Just believe some are nastier.
Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Why does it I don't agree with him or the other way whereas you obviously do.
