italiahorse
Well-Known Member
We are under Wasps !!
Have you got enough information to say Sisu plan will make us better off ?
December Stadium Deadline (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter ccfc92
- Start date
We are under Wasps !!
Have you got enough information to say Sisu plan will make us better off ?
Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
If a new ground is built it will have to be paid for by someone else, the club will not be able to afford it. The rent will have to be low enough to be 'affordable', otherwise our owners will have to fund the losses. For those reasons the club will be better off getting a new ground from a profit point of view. This doesn't mean though that the much heralded income will be higher than it could be at the Ricoh.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
You seem content to let wasps play games with us.
I don't know how you of all people can include a factor as to how many will follow outside the City.
Really have a word with yourself.
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
I'm a businessman I want to see how the figures stack up.
I'm a CCFC fan I want to see if Sisu are gambling with my teams future.
NorthernWisdom
Well-Known Member
I can say with absolute certainty that restricting the options to the sole option of being subservient to a ruthless commercially driven operation will mean the chances of us escaping SISU ownership/existing will diminish immensely.
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
Follow Sisu blindly then.
We already know that fans will not travel distance to watch the team.
Location will be key to maintain a fan base particularly if we are financing a new stadium.
J
Jack Griffin
Guest
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
bawtryneal
Well-Known Member
They (SISU) must still believe they will receive compensation from CCC or they would not continue with the court action. The success of this action will determine if we ever get our own stadium, in my opinion.
I see us being at the Ricoh, under Wasps ownership, for at least two more years. This season plus two more.
If we win any claim against CCC, if will be appealed, so two years for that to run its course.
If we lose then SISU will soon disappear. Then what happens ????
I see us being at the Ricoh, under Wasps ownership, for at least two more years. This season plus two more.
If we win any claim against CCC, if will be appealed, so two years for that to run its course.
If we lose then SISU will soon disappear. Then what happens ????
NorthernWisdom
Well-Known Member
Not at all.
It's common sense.
Nil your colours to one (economically driven) mast, and that allows you to be exploited ruthlessly without mercy.
As a businessman, you should know that.
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
Whoever pays for the ground will want a return. That return will be rental or access to revenues generated by the stadium. Unless you know differently ??
NorthernWisdom
Well-Known Member
Two wrongs don't make a right, of course.
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Interesting read.
Open question. Wasn't Propco Opco arrangements that sent a load of businesses to the wall years ago? I'm thinking one retail chain and several nursing home chains? I'll have to have a google later but I'm sure it was something to do with propcos using the asset for further investments and when they failed hiking up the rent to the opco side to cover losses causing opco to fail.
Seems to me that by answering the question TF has possibly raised more questions than answer's
NorthernWisdom
Well-Known Member
I can mean them as well, of course. In fact, as you've rightly pointed out they're kind of interchangeable.
Which is why it would be madness to put faith in a ruthless commercially driven enterprise, that puts financial before cultural profit.
Nick
Administrator
As opposed to blindly following a random rugby club and hanging on their every word? Whereas nobody actually blindly follows SISU.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Except those that went to Sixfields.
Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
And the rent and/or access to revenues will have to be set at a level that can be afforded by the club, otherwise SISU will have to fund the difference, and why would they sign up to that?
Nick
Administrator
Yep exactly like that!
Nick
Administrator
Why shouldn't they? Wasps can say they want 5 million a year else we cant play there again, but if SISU say no and move us it is SISU's fault.
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
I just wish they'd produce figures on how the new stadium would generate revenue, that would outweigh a move from the Ricoh plus building costs.
People keep spouting conference etc, but surely there would be more desirable/prestigious venues in the surrounding area than a 18,000 seater football stadium.
People keep spouting conference etc, but surely there would be more desirable/prestigious venues in the surrounding area than a 18,000 seater football stadium.
stupot07
Well-Known Member
Did they follow them blindly?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Nick
Administrator
Did they follow them blindly?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Do, not, bite!
Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
I'm not saying they shouldn't, but I can't see why they would. I don't think many people would blame SISU for moving out based on the decision of not wanting to pay £5m rent, in fact I think if they played it better the first time they would have got more sympathy for not wanting to pay £1m rent.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
If SISU are the propco as I understand it they can borrow against the stadium we're renting. If they have to put some money in to cover losses on rent you can be almost certain it's going straight back into their pockets and all the while they're using the stadium they kindly built us as collateral to fund other projects. A new stadium could be a win win for SISU, it's naive to automatically assume that the same follow's for the club. Not saying this is the likely scenario just that we have more questions than answers and like I pointed out in an earlier post Tim's answer saying it will be a propco opco arrangement asks more questions. Questions that any serious CCFC fan should want asking and answering.
stupot07
Well-Known Member
A bit like wasps borrowing money on ACL?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Did they follow them blindly?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Not unless they knew what SISU were going to do next and I don't know about you but I'd find it impossible to believe anyone who claimed they knew what SISU were going to do next. I have trouble believing that SISU knew what they were going to do next myself. They were winging it, they had no guarantees what any of their actions would achieve.
Last edited:
Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
On the basis the the propco will have to borrow money to get a stadium built, there won't be any equity left to borrow any more.
I don't follow the part about them putting money in their pockets, surely it's their money in the first place.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
A bit like wasps borrowing money on ACL?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Exactly. We've got plenty of posters salivating at the thought of Wasps going bump of the back of the bonds but seem willing to sleep walk our club possibly into a similar situation abusing anyone who questions it as council lovers, wasps lovers or club hater's.
Last edited:
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Aren't they supposed to be bringing in a retail partner to cover a big portion of the costs? I'd imagine the stadium might be eligible for some grants. Although none of this has ever really been explained more than a few flippant comments here and there so we're both pissing in the wind really with how it will be financed. It's probably a bit much to expect a business plan after two years I guess
bawtryneal
Well-Known Member
i haven't a clue what they could potentially win but SISU must believe it would be substantial or why bother. They will request many millions in compensation if they win the case and a subsequent appeal. After years of "sitting on the fence" I personally believe they will win. Is going to be a very interesting outcome.
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
Hazard a guess so I can see how your argument works.
bawtryneal
Well-Known Member
£7.5 million. A guess as requested.
Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
Aren't they supposed to be bringing in a retail partner to cover a big portion of the costs? I'd imagine the stadium might be eligible for some grants. Although none of this has ever really been explained more than a few flippant comments here and there so we're both pissing in the wind really with how it will be financed. It's probably a bit much to expect a business plan after two years I guess
It would need to be a nice piece of land in a relatively prime location to get retail partners involved, and you'd have to wonder why they need the club to build a stadium to get access to a site for themselves. I think we probably agree on the likelihood of us getting a new ground built. I just think if we did get one, by some miracle, it's likely to be our best hope of a long term future.
