mark82

Moderator
Jul 15, 2010
19,450
10,745
413
South Yorkshire
Well, he might we ll do if it was a rolling weekly deal which meant he was technically under contract but with no commitment blocking him from leaving if he wanted to....


Because he's a talented player and even if he plays a couple of games and then leaves it'll be worth it if his contributions helps us get points on the board.

He's really not that good. He's a good player and I'd like him to stay but he's not good enough to do that for.
 

Nick

Administrator
Feb 25, 2008
137,783
56,624
1,063
Coventry
Is he really that good that he can just stroll in here and there for a game and make a difference?

I'd much rather play somebody committed than upset the balance of the team to fit somebody in who is hardly a superstar. It didn't even work with Joe Cole.

It's not like drafting a ringer in for Sunday league when they haven't got a semi pro game where they will totally boss it and score 7 goals.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2011
82,403
36,747
813
Well, he might we ll do if it was a rolling weekly deal which meant he was technically under contract but with no commitment blocking him from leaving if he wanted to....


Because he's a talented player and even if he plays a couple of games and then leaves it'll be worth it if his contributions helps us get points on the board.

He has already agreed terms with a Premier League club. He breaks his leg on saturday?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mark82

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2013
26,799
35,090
313
Brizzle
I think that you can only have one contract offer given to a player at any one time. To offer him a rolling weekly contract we'd have to withdraw what's on the table now and any money we'd be entitled to through a tribunal would be significantly reduced.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2011
82,403
36,747
813
I think he was just using it as an example of why he wouldn't do it.

Yes though its certain he will have agreed something with them already if the club have rejected the offer
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
Aug 26, 2016
6,957
7,089
263
Good luck GT where ever you end up.
Thanks for the 100% effort you always put in wearing the shirt.
I hope you don't see this as you will have read a lot of posts from imbeciles unnecessarily slagging you off.
the issue is him messing about is affecting us now. I wish him the best, he's made the best of limited talent and will get a good move.

Him just hanging about is souring it a little. Surely a quiet word to Robins to say he's off so we can use that budget on someone else
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
Aug 17, 2008
13,733
3,319
163
Costa del Cov
the issue is him messing about is affecting us now. I wish him the best, he's made the best of limited talent and will get a good move.

Him just hanging about is souring it a little. Surely a quiet word to Robins to say he's off so we can use that budget on someone else
But is it him messing us about or can the clubs not get there acts together?
 

mark82

Moderator
Jul 15, 2010
19,450
10,745
413
South Yorkshire
the issue is him messing about is affecting us now. I wish him the best, he's made the best of limited talent and will get a good move.

Him just hanging about is souring it a little. Surely a quiet word to Robins to say he's off so we can use that budget on someone else

I wouldn't say he has limited talent. A former England international called him the most talented player at the club. To realise that potential he needs to play regularly. This saga dragging on is hurting both George and us.
 

Nick

Administrator
Feb 25, 2008
137,783
56,624
1,063
Coventry
Could it be another camwell situation where there is no apparently maybe no actual bid? ;)

It was said they made an offer, apparently he heard nothing from Stoke
 

oucho

Well-Known Member
Feb 28, 2015
4,938
2,782
163
Lincoln
Is he really that good that he can just stroll in here and there for a game and make a difference?

I'd much rather play somebody committed than upset the balance of the team to fit somebody in who is hardly a superstar. It didn't even work with Joe Cole.

It's not like drafting a ringer in for Sunday league when they haven't got a semi pro game where they will totally boss it and score 7 goals.
No but right now he'd be in my first choice XI and therefore would start if he was available, under contract and fit.
 

Nick

Administrator
Feb 25, 2008
137,783
56,624
1,063
Coventry
No but right now he'd be in my first choice XI and therefore would start if he was available, under contract and fit.
He would need to play to get fit, taking the place of somebody committed and a full pre season. Like Cole did
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2008
25,331
10,536
313
Warwick
If he wanted to leave he'd go, if he wanted to stay he'd sign.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well, he obviously does want to go. However, the fly in the ointment is that somebody has to want you. It seems Leicester do (or did) but they haven't made a concrete offer, so he'll be in limbo until that happens. It's his own fault. No sympathy, just want him gone. I'm not particularly going to miss a player who's had a couple of good months in his career so far.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2011
82,403
36,747
813
Again as with Turnball if Thomas had flopped when he made it in the team he would have been dumped like Finch.

Why should he give a fuck about the club and its fans when no one would give a fuck about him if he hadn't delivered?

He needs to think of himself and himself only
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
Sep 10, 2014
6,691
4,144
213
....maybe he think he's good enough for bigger fish than Swansea and Leicester.
 

twistandshout

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2012
138
75
78
The way I understand is that even though George is out of contract City are due a development fee.Leicester have made an offer and Cov have declined it, Leicester can up the offer , pull out or go to a tribunal.More likely they will wait and as we get closer to the transfer window closing City who need the money for a striker will except a lower fee.
 

Sbarcher

Well-Known Member
Mar 23, 2011
4,202
3,126
213
Oxford
Leicester seem to be playing hardball. Not sure why they won't pay 500k for him. The difference is less than 2 weeks wages for Vardy. Maybe it's to show who bosses the M69! 200k is nothing to them but significant to us. Think they are greedy buggers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: no_loyalty

AlansEyes

Well-Known Member
Oct 2, 2016
441
458
113
Leicester can hold out because they hold all of the cards here. Thomas isn't joining them to go into the first team so it makes no difference to them if they sign him today or on 1st Sept. We're trying to play hardball with the fee but they know we will become increasingly twitchy as the month drags on and will probably snap their hand off if they come back in with their original offer.
 

Nick

Administrator
Feb 25, 2008
137,783
56,624
1,063
Coventry
Leicester can hold out because they hold all of the cards here. Thomas isn't joining them to go into the first team so it makes no difference to them if they sign him today or on 1st Sept. We're trying to play hardball with the fee but they know we will become increasingly twitchy as the month drags on and will probably snap their hand off if they come back in with their original offer.
So just let it go to tribunal then :)
 

AJB1983

Well-Known Member
Jun 7, 2013
737
306
113
I think Thomas goes then Mr Baker will be in, money from Thomas used to pay up his contract at Pompey?
 

Seamus1

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2010
580
634
143
What if Leicester City now think 'actually he's not worth it, we'll put this money towards developing the next Chilwell' and so withdraw any offering to Thomas.

We are then left with a player who will continue to dick about trying to find other clubs and then use CCFC as a last resort to sign the contract offered to him, and who for probably the first two months of the campaign will be behind in terms of fitness yet picking up better wages.

The rule needs to be changed in so far as the new contract offer can be withdrawn by the club once the player has passed the end of the original contract, yet compensation still owed due to having made the offer. CCFC could be waiting another month now to get in a much needed striker because of all of this.
 

Nick

Administrator
Feb 25, 2008
137,783
56,624
1,063
Coventry
What if Leicester City now think 'actually he's not worth it, we'll put this money towards developing the next Chilwell' and so withdraw any offering to Thomas.

We are then left with a player who will continue to dick about trying to find other clubs and then use CCFC as a last resort to sign the contract offered to him, and who for probably the first two months of the campaign will be behind in terms of fitness yet picking up better wages.

The rule needs to be changed in so far as the new contract offer can be withdrawn by the club once the player has passed the end of the original contract, yet compensation still owed due to having made the offer. CCFC could be waiting another month now to get in a much needed striker because of all of this.

There should definitely be a deadline on how long the offer from us remains before losing out on compensation. George Thomas is effectively a free agent now so can sign for somebody outside of the window can't he?
 

no_loyalty

Well-Known Member
Feb 24, 2015
9,453
4,662
213
George Thomas is effectively a free agent now so can sign for somebody outside of the window can't he?

I don't believe he can sign for a premier league club outside of the transfer window, but he could sign for a championship club. I'm not sure about leagues in other countries though
 

Users who are viewing this thread