Ryan Haynes (5 Viewers)

Forums New posts
covcity4life

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
That would be a first and I highly doubt it
Click to expand...

in response to someone saying heard he had a excellent game

please dont try twist this one with excellent/good, even people who respect you will lose all hope
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Otis

Otis

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
Like who? Mowbray is using Haynes as a last resort. I agree he's good enough for 4 or 5 games a season at this level.
Click to expand...
Sorry Grendel, but how can you come to that conclusion? How is he using Haynes as a last resort? Stokes has been really good all season long and has deserved to keep his place.

Haynes is back up and has been on the bench a number of times. If someone else was there ahead of Haynes and getting chosen to cover Stokes and Haynes was pushed to the back of the queue then I would say you have a point, but do you really think TM would go into a season with just one left back and then one he would use as a last resort? If Haynes was last resort there would be someone ahead of him in the queue to cover Stokes.
 
Hobo

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
Good and excellent are two different words.

Have a look in the dictionary.
Click to expand...

Yes they are and you never used good. You made a sweeping open ended statement giving no merit to his performance.
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Otis said:
Sorry Grendel, but how can you come to that conclusion? How is he using Haynes as a last resort? Stokes has been really good all season long and has deserved to keep his place.

Haynes is back up and has been on the bench a number of times. If someone else was there ahead of Haynes and getting chosen to cover Stokes and Haynes was pushed to the back of the queue then I would say you have a point, but do you really think TM would go into a season with just one left back and then one he would use as a last resort? If Haynes was last resort there would be someone ahead of him in the queue to cover Stokes.
Click to expand...

If Willis and Johnson were still fit both Ricketts and possibly Johnson would have been the first choice left back options if stokes was injured.

Many thought Ricketts was going to start as a fullback.
 
Otis

Otis

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
If Willis and Johnson were still fit both Ricketts and possibly Johnson would have been the first choice left back options if stokes was injured.

Many thought Ricketts was going to start as a fullback.
Click to expand...
I think the plan WAS to play Ricketts at full back wasn't it?

I am not so sure Johnson would have been first choice left back. He's always looked all at sea over there.

For me Haynes should go out on loan and get some game time. We simply haven't got the cover though to allow that to happen at the moment.
 
letsallsingtogether

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
If Willis and Johnson were still fit both Ricketts and possibly Johnson would have been the first choice left back options if stokes was injured.

Many thought Ricketts was going to start as a fullback.
Click to expand...

And maybe if we had brought another 2 players for that position.
Maybe maybe maybe.
 
Otis

Otis

Well-Known Member
I didn't think Jordan Clarke was so bad myself. He had some cracking games for us and then some awful ones, so I guess it was his lack of consistency. Similar scenario with Aaron Phillips at the moment I would say.

Sent from my Hudl 2 using Tapatalk
 
covcity4life

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
still mean what i said about great improvement but just seen gillingham goals and wtf was he doing for their 3rd goal? gave away ball in box and then took the players legs out!

until he eradicates dumb shit like that i am not sure i will ever be confident in him 100%

*apologies if it was willis and not clarke*


I dint think that's too bad! I still credited his improvement

Difference here G is that I watched footage and saw something I didn't like

You didn't go game and not seen highlights when you said I highly doubt he did well. That's the comment people want you to explain

Be a hater all you like by all means, just don't overstep into troll territory by refusing to acknowledge anything that goes against your views
 
pw362

pw362

Well-Known Member
That’s the best I’ve seen from Ryan since I arrived at the football club. He did well defending and attacking and he proved that he can play left-back for our first team.
The opinion of TM on his performance on Monday.
 
Otis

Otis

Well-Known Member
Hope he's right. We need another string to our bow and the good thing is, if Haynes is playing well we can stick him wide left midfield. I'm not talking about from the off, but if there are say 15 mins left and we want to kill a game off. Have him play in front of Stokes as an extra bit of defensive cover.

Interesting with those comments as to whether TM might consider Stokes as a more permanent centre back solution and put Haynes at left back?

For me having Haynes and Phillips is all a bit too lightweight. I like Stokes because he has a bit of steel about him and some muscularity.
 
mechaishida

mechaishida

Well-Known Member
I think if we had another match-fit left back for cover, Haynes would have gone out on loan to get some games and experience under his belt. It's all he's lacking really; look past the errors and shortcomings for what they are, novice mistakes.

I think 6 months on loan to a L2 side would do him the world of good. If, of course, we have cover for Stokes.
 
shmmeee

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
stupot07 said:
Didn't see many coming forward in defence of Thomas, Clarke, finch, Burge, Phillips, Jeffers, grandison, etc, etc, etc.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
Click to expand...

I stuck up for Clarke! And I'm still sticking up for Thomas! And I always liked Grandison.
 
fernandopartridge

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
shmmeee said:
I stuck up for Clarke! And I'm still sticking up for Thomas! And I always liked Grandison.
Click to expand...

I too stick up for both Clarke and Thomas. Thomas gets an unbelievable amount of criticism on here. Clarke was his own worst enemy at times, but showed competence at others.
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
fernandopartridge said:
I too stick up for both Clarke and Thomas. Thomas gets an unbelievable amount of criticism on here. Clarke was his own worst enemy at times, but showed competence at others.
Click to expand...

I also have stuck up for Thomas who is perfectly adequate as a reserve division 1 player to be called on for cover for a few games a season.

That's what annoys me to be honest. How some players get hugely preferential treatment for their youth but others don't.

He is for some reason the whipping boy on this forum.

You don't really get bad games from Thomas just average to below average as he's a cautious player.
 
Otis

Otis

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
I also have stuck up for Thomas who is perfectly adequate as a reserve division 1 player to be called on for cover for a few games a season.

That's what annoys me to be honest. How some players get hugely preferential treatment for their youth but others don't.

He is for some reason the whipping boy on this forum.

You don't really get bad games from Thomas just average to below average as he's a cautious player.
Click to expand...
Totally agree with all of that.
 
stupot07

stupot07

Well-Known Member
RB1992 said:
How was Haynes today?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

He was complaining about having a cold, but the little trooper still played.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
Really good today. Played with passion and drive. Even some quality. Defiantly improved of late even Grendel would admit if he was there today?
 
letsallsingtogether

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Yes he looks like he is getting better every week.
Wasn't beaten once never gave the ball away and did some great 1-2s with murphy.
 
Malaka

Malaka

Well-Known Member
For the first time in ages, he had a good game. Im delighted for him as he has struggled this season.
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
But..but...grendel said he's appalling and incapable of putting in a good performance?

I'm confused. How could grendel be wrong? Surely not?

Cole also had a good game...
 
idm1975

idm1975

Well-Known Member
PVA said:
But..but...grendel said he's appalling and incapable of putting in a good performance?

I'm confused. How could grendel be wrong? Surely not?

Cole also had a good game...
Click to expand...
Dont....he'll ask u for a date!
 
chiefdave

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Good to hear he had a decent game but to be fair there's a big difference between defending against Crewe and the games coming up against Burton and Walsall.

Of course you can only play the team in front of you so lets hope we do the same again in the next game!
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
PVA said:
But..but...grendel said he's appalling and incapable of putting in a good performance?

I'm confused. How could grendel be wrong? Surely not?

Cole also had a good game...
Click to expand...

So would you drop stokes for him then when we get a centre half?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)
Top