jimmyhillsfanclub
Well-Known Member
...As there is a bit of a EU debate raging on the footy forum section, I though I'd gauge the current SBT opinion on the EU referendum.
EU referendum? What's that? Never heard of it....As there is a bit of a EU debate raging on the footy forum section, I though I'd gauge the current SBT opinion on the EU referendum.
EU referendum? What's that? Never heard of it.
If there is actually one by chance then why haven't I heard anything about it in the press or media?
Of course we would. Why is that hard to accept?What I find hard to accept is that even if we vote out we still need a change in our law to leave the EU.
Only the politicians can allow us to leave.
Yes, reading Daniel Hannan's book at the moment which does set out a rational case for leaving.I agree with you there. Unlike the EU however, we can remove them. The only politician I've seen make a solid case for leaving is Daniel Hannan - who unlike either side of the campaign is actually looking at it from both sides. He's already said leaving will cause problems, but he's already set out a way to get past them.
For what's it's worth, I don't think it'll matter what people vote for. I'm 99% certain we'll stay in due the Tory's doing the fear campaign just like they do at the elections. As I said though, I feel it's just a case if staying in a bit longer before it crumbles away.
It's actually a very straightforward choice:
Self determination, control and democracy
or
Dictatorship, uncontrolled mass immigration and instability.
It's actually a very straightforward choice:
Self determination, control and democracy
or
Dictatorship, uncontrolled mass immigration and instability
The EU is in chaos. It's sinking and if we remain they will milk us dry.
Vote leave. Vote freedom.
Free movement has been a bit of a disaster, its allowed segregated communities to form in foreign countries, which leads to an us and them type attitude which imo has fueled a rise in right wing politics. On the flip side I like that the EU has contributed to improve the infrastructure of poorer countries, for example Poland and would quite like if that type of thing could continue under the banner. However as time goes by I cant see that the current set up of the unelected in Brussels can continue to increase their budgets, ask for larger contributions without being held accountable. For me if the running of the EU could be reformed with each member state having an elected spokesperson who carries a vote then for me it would be much better. However the reality is its nothing like that so for me it has to be out.
The EU should and will change, IMO. Free movement is excellent, go and spend some time living in Europe, you'll have a great time!
Free movement has been a bit of a disaster, its allowed segregated communities to form in foreign countries, which leads to an us and them type attitude which imo has fueled a rise in right wing politics. On the flip side I like that the EU has contributed to improve the infrastructure of poorer countries, for example Poland and would quite like if that type of thing could continue under the banner. However as time goes by I cant see that the current set up of the unelected in Brussels can continue to increase their budgets, ask for larger contributions without being held accountable. For me if the running of the EU could be reformed with each member state having an elected spokesperson who carries a vote then for me it would be much better. However the reality is its nothing like that so for me it has to be out.
I accept that the idea of free movement is excellent, sadly I think the reality is somewhat different. Rather like the EU, the idea is good, the running of it not so much.
The genuinely segregated communities (which means Pakistanis and Bangladeshis lets be honest) are not from within the EU in my experience.